Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostIt can IF IT MEETS THE CRITERIA, was the criteria met, NO because The situation was not monitored by WADA, WADA didn't need to monitor NSAC, they needed to monitor usada, it doesn't matter what you highly doubt, the rule states an advance TUE
From the ISTUE:
4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:
c. The applicable rules required the athlete (see comment to article 5.1) or permitted the athlete (see code article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive tue; or
if an anti-doping organization chooses to collect a sample from a person who is not an international- level or national-level athlete, and that person is using a prohibited substance or prohibited method for the****utic reasons, the anti-doping organization may permit him or her to apply for a retroactive tue.
This is from the WADA CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS! The single most important documents in this entire process. Give up.
Nothing you say, nothing you bring up, trumps these two documents!Last edited by travestyny; 11-07-2017, 09:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostMonitored by WADA: No. WADA doesn't monitor NSAC.
A home visit: Depends on what you mean by "visit." A paramedic was called. It's not a mobile hydration IV clinic. I highly doubt a paramedic being called is what they mean here.
Now two questions in return:
Is USADA monitored by WADA?
Did the WADA spokesperson say that a retroactive TUE can be issued for rehydration according to their rules?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostKeep in mind a paramedic cannot authorize fluid to have an IV unless it's an emergency, it wasn't an emergency TUE
4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:
a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or
c. The applicable rules required the athlete (see comment to article 5.1) or permitted the athlete (see code article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive tue; or
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dosumpthin View PostLol. I remember that!!! I remember reading some idiot using Floyd vs BIG SHOW WWE weight to prove a point about Floyd's fight night weight.
That was westernchamp?????? What a ****ing loser.
LMAO.
****ing idiot.
Damn. Pact@rds looking real bad in this thread. Lol.
WWE?
That's worst than ADP02 link to a WHIZZINATOR quote.
HI HATERS: FYI - Floyd still has the Connor check. AND STILL HAS THE MANNY CHECK
It's bad when you defend Floyd and his most hardcore fans on this forum call you a moron for It. You are by far the biggest loser here and you have the balls to talk about someone else.
What an embarrassment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostWhere does it say a paramedic can authorise a TUE, it doesn't does it, again your trying to mislead and your terrible at it
Lol. Yea ok. You’re ridiculous. It says that he is allowed to apply for a retro TUE by their rules. IT’S IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.
It’s over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostI posted the rule for you. Here it is again:
From the ISTUE:
Code Article 4.4.5
This is from the WADA CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS! The single most important documents in this entire process. Give up.
Nothing you say, nothing you bring up, trumps these two documents!
The criteria are:
The athlete would experience significant health problems without taking the prohibited substance or method;
The the****utic use of the substance would not produce significant enhancement of performance;
There is no reasonable the****utic alternative to the use of the otherwise prohibited substance or method;
The requirement to use that substance or method is not due to the prior use of the substance or method without a TUE which was prohibited at the time of use.
For the TUE to be granted, all four criteria must be met., then he needs to meet this, -IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.--------its quite clear he didn't meet all of the criteria so it doesn't matter what garbage, maybe, if, possibly rules you post because he needs to fulfil the criteria, remember fluid said himself it was for rehydration, his urine was dark, no medical condition mentioned, WADA says ther can't be any alternative legal cure which there is, drink waterLast edited by Shape up; 11-08-2017, 01:53 AM.
Comment
-
Comment