Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Monitored by WADA: No. WADA doesn't monitor NSAC.

    A home visit: Depends on what you mean by "visit." A paramedic was called. It's not a mobile hydration IV clinic. I highly doubt a paramedic being called is what they mean here.


    Now two questions in return:

    Is USADA monitored by WADA?
    Did the WADA spokesperson say that a retroactive TUE can be issued for rehydration according to their rules?
    It can IF IT MEETS THE CRITERIA, was the criteria met, NO because The situation was not monitored by WADA, WADA didn't need to monitor NSAC, they needed to monitor usada, it doesn't matter what you highly doubt, the rule states an advance TUE

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
      It can IF IT MEETS THE CRITERIA, was the criteria met, NO because The situation was not monitored by WADA, WADA didn't need to monitor NSAC, they needed to monitor usada, it doesn't matter what you highly doubt, the rule states an advance TUE
      I posted the rule for you. Here it is again:

      From the ISTUE:

      4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:

      c. The applicable rules required the athlete (see comment to article 5.1) or permitted the athlete (see code article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive tue; or
      Code Article 4.4.5

      if an anti-doping organization chooses to collect a sample from a person who is not an international- level or national-level athlete, and that person is using a prohibited substance or prohibited method for the****utic reasons, the anti-doping organization may permit him or her to apply for a retroactive tue.

      This is from the WADA CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS! The single most important documents in this entire process. Give up.

      Nothing you say, nothing you bring up, trumps these two documents!
      Last edited by travestyny; 11-07-2017, 09:50 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Monitored by WADA: No. WADA doesn't monitor NSAC.

        A home visit: Depends on what you mean by "visit." A paramedic was called. It's not a mobile hydration IV clinic. I highly doubt a paramedic being called is what they mean here.


        Now two questions in return:

        Is USADA monitored by WADA?
        Did the WADA spokesperson say that a retroactive TUE can be issued for rehydration according to their rules?
        Keep in mind a paramedic cannot authorize fluid to have an IV unless it's an emergency, it wasn't an emergency TUE

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          Keep in mind a paramedic cannot authorize fluid to have an IV unless it's an emergency, it wasn't an emergency TUE
          That's not true. Look at WADA's rules for a TUE:


          4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:

          a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

          c. The applicable rules required the athlete (see comment to article 5.1) or permitted the athlete (see code article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive tue; or

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
            Lol. I remember that!!! I remember reading some idiot using Floyd vs BIG SHOW WWE weight to prove a point about Floyd's fight night weight.

            That was westernchamp?????? What a ****ing loser.

            LMAO.





            ****ing idiot.




            Damn. Pact@rds looking real bad in this thread. Lol.


            WWE?


            That's worst than ADP02 link to a WHIZZINATOR quote.
            Speaking of losers, Remember this........

            HI HATERS: FYI - Floyd still has the Connor check. AND STILL HAS THE MANNY CHECK

            It's bad when you defend Floyd and his most hardcore fans on this forum call you a moron for It. You are by far the biggest loser here and you have the balls to talk about someone else.

            What an embarrassment.

            Comment


            • Pacf@gs are ****ing pathetic......hanging on to anything(even if its bs) to justify why Pacquiao got schooled.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                That's not true. Look at WADA's rules for a TUE:
                Where does it say a paramedic can authorise a TUE, it doesn't does it, again your trying to mislead and your terrible at it

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                  Where does it say a paramedic can authorise a TUE, it doesn't does it, again your trying to mislead and your terrible at it
                  I’m being misleading by posting the WADA Code?

                  Lol. Yea ok. You’re ridiculous. It says that he is allowed to apply for a retro TUE by their rules. IT’S IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.

                  It’s over.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                    I posted the rule for you. Here it is again:

                    From the ISTUE:



                    Code Article 4.4.5




                    This is from the WADA CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS! The single most important documents in this entire process. Give up.

                    Nothing you say, nothing you bring up, trumps these two documents!
                    These 4 criteria have to be met for a TUE, -----3. WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A TUE? UP

                    The criteria are:

                    The athlete would experience significant health problems without taking the prohibited substance or method;
                    The the****utic use of the substance would not produce significant enhancement of performance;
                    There is no reasonable the****utic alternative to the use of the otherwise prohibited substance or method;
                    The requirement to use that substance or method is not due to the prior use of the substance or method without a TUE which was prohibited at the time of use.
                    For the TUE to be granted, all four criteria must be met., then he needs to meet this, -IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.--------its quite clear he didn't meet all of the criteria so it doesn't matter what garbage, maybe, if, possibly rules you post because he needs to fulfil the criteria, remember fluid said himself it was for rehydration, his urine was dark, no medical condition mentioned, WADA says ther can't be any alternative legal cure which there is, drink water
                    Last edited by Shape up; 11-08-2017, 01:53 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      I’m being misleading by posting the WADA Code?

                      Lol. Yea ok. You’re ridiculous. It says that he is allowed to apply for a retro TUE by their rules. IT’S IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.

                      It’s over.
                      Where does it say a paramedic can authorise the IV

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP