Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[ADP02]

So you’ve been embarrassed by me numerous times, and jump on the alt bandwagon to deal with it. Lmao. Pretty funny.

I’ve offered you guys all perma ban bets, in which I will allow the mods to check my IP address and REVEAL IF I HAVE ANY alt here.

Still no one is willing to take me up on this offer. I wonder why.

I get it. When you take an L, claim someone has an alt.

I also left it open ended ... I said that you Floyd fans think alike so that can be why.




On the other hand, I read the other day that I'm Spoon's ALT. Really? Now read your post again and apply what you said to yourself!!!


.

[travestyny]

I also left it open ended ... I said that you Floyd fans think alike so that can be why.




On the other hand, I read the other day that I'm Spoon's ALT. Really? Now read your post again and apply what you said to yourself!!!


.

Relax, dude. I obviously don't think you are Spoon. You aren't that dumb.

[ADP02]

You know Lance Armstrong but I could and did bring up other names .... example was the athletes his doctor who provided fake medical conditions to get a BS TUE.






USADA
"The DCO will check the specific gravity (concentration) of the sample. Additional samples may be requested if the sample is not within the required range."

In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory!

You really don't understand any of this well, and that's why you are spreading lies.

International Standard for Testing and Investigations (ISTI)--Urine Sample Collection Guidelines




Can I stop there, or should I pull more out of that document? Do you know what a requirement is?

The only way they stop the sample collection procedure is if it is IMPOSSIBLE to continue. Obviously, it wasn't impossible in this case since THEY GOT THE FULL SAMPLE.

Even on the page that you posted the quotation from, they have a video that clearly states "The DCO will check to specific gravity to ENSURE that the sample is in the REQUIRED RANGE for testing." Again..REQUIRED.

Stop spreading lies! First your lie that they could stop testing if there is no residual urine, and now this. Stop trying to pull shlt out of your ass to fit your dumb agenda. It's not going to work.

So what you are saying is that the quote from USADA is WRONG and full of SH$T? Just asking ....

Oh and what you are really stating is that , USADA LIEs.
Got it! Thanks for confirming. I agree!
.




.

[travestyny]

So what you are saying is that the quote from USADA is WRONG and full of SH$T? Just asking ....

Oh and what you are really stating is that , USADA LIEs.
Got it! Thanks for confirming. I agree!
.




.

No, fool. I'm saying that you don't understand what they are saying, and you are spreading lies because you have so little understanding of this.

Look at the video on their site. What does it say in the video?

I already told you that the session can be stopped if it is deemed IMPOSSIBLE. USADA is well aware of the rule that the sample must be at a REQUIRED level. It's in WADA's rules, it's in USADA's rules, and it's in the rules for the labs. There isn't much more to say about that. You are wrong.

[Shape up]

Nice try, but the contract was negotiated and signed off on by Manny Pacquiao and his team first, BEFORE Mayweather.

Did you go check out the USADA Protocol? Did you find the articles in ANNEX A that you said were missing? Let me know, bro. Then admit you were wrong and go enroll in primary school. Aren't you from Australia? Maybe the guy that taught Pacquiao a lesson in the ring can teach you one out of it.

Is that the best you can do ******, IVayweather is the one who wanted usada, he's the one who tells his employee, usada what he wants in the contract, then sends it to pacquaios team, now remember the cheating *** IVayweather tried to write into the contract that ANY TUE issued was to be COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL, NOT DISCLOSED to NSAC , PACQUAIO or anyone else, you know that already so why try with a bull**** excuse, because you know I have every angle you can bring covered, now how about the substantive change to code knobjockey

[travestyny]

Is that the best you can do ******, IVayweather is the one who wanted usada, he's the one who tells his employee, usada what he wants in the contract, then sends it to pacquaios team,

now remember the cheating *** IVayweather tried to write into the contract that ANY TUE issued was to be COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL, NOT DISCLOSED to NSAC , PACQUAIO or anyone else,

you know that already so why try with a bull**** excuse, because you know I have every angle you can bring covered, now how about the substantive change to code knobjockey

How the **** did he try to write it into the contract when the contract was brought to him AFTER Pacquiao negotiated and signed it?

DUDE, YOU'VE EMBARRASSED YOURSELF ENOUGH. DID YOU FIND THE CODE THAT YOU WERE LOOKING FOR IN ANNEX A OR NOT? DON'T YOU FEEL ****** ABOUT RANTING IN YOUR SIZE 7 RED FONT AND THEN FINDING OUT ONCE AGAIN THAT YOU'RE A ****ING MORON WHO HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.

YOU'RE ****ING AS DUMB AS A BRICK. I MEAN THAT. GO THE **** AWAY ALREADY. I'M TIRED OF OWNING YOU OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN!

[travestyny]

Is that the best you can do ******, IVayweather is the one who wanted usada, he's the one who tells his employee, usada what he wants in the contract, then sends it to pacquaios team, now remember the cheating *** IVayweather tried to write into the contract that ANY TUE issued was to be COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL, NOT DISCLOSED to NSAC , PACQUAIO or anyone else, you know that already so why try with a bull**** excuse, because you know I have every angle you can bring covered, now how about the substantive change to code knobjockey

ANSWER THE QUESTION LITTLE BlTCH. DID YOU FIND THE CODE THAT YOU SAID WAS MISSING IN ANNEX A?

DID YOU?

BOW DOWN, BlTCH.

[ADP02]

No, fool. I'm saying that you don't understand what they are saying, and you are spreading lies because you have so little understanding of this.

Look at the video on their site. What does it say in the video?

I already told you that the session can be stopped if it is deemed IMPOSSIBLE. USADA is well aware of the rule that the sample must be at a REQUIRED level. It's in WADA's rules, it's in USADA's rules, and it's in the rules for the labs. There isn't much more to say about that. You are wrong.

So now you are starting to get it.

I brought up the fact that under certain circumstances the DCO can be providing the lab with a Specific Gravity that is not met.

Finally, YOU GOT IT .... Because YOU FINALLY READ IT!!!!


But we just dealt with one point. There are all those other points that I brought up.

[travestyny]

So now you are starting to get it.

I brought up the fact that under certain circumstances the DCO can be providing the lab with a Specific Gravity that is not met.

Finally, YOU GOT IT .... Because YOU FINALLY READ IT!!!!


But we just dealt with one point. There are all those other points that I brought up.

No, you moron. You still don't get it.

You pulled shlt out of your ass, like they can stop if there is no residual urine. Something that you won't even address anymore.

Don't ever try to talk about what I get, because clearly I get more of this than you do. The DCO is REQUIRED to get a sample that is within the required range. If a sample doesn't meet it, he gives that sample to the lab anyway, and STILL GETS A SAMPLE THAT MEETS THE REQUIRED RANGE.

Go read something and stop spreading lies.

I told you about thinking you're more knowledgeable than others. That's why you always make an ass of yourself.

So what about that residual urine, huh? Do they stop the session if there is none?

[ADP02]

USADA

"The DCO will check the specific gravity (concentration) of the sample. Additional samples may be requested if the sample is not within the required range."

In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory

So now you are starting to get it.

I brought up the fact that under certain circumstances the DCO can be providing the lab with a Specific Gravity that is not met.

Finally, YOU GOT IT .... Because YOU FINALLY READ IT!!!!


But we just dealt with one point. There are all those other points that I brought up.

No, you moron. You still don't get it.

You pulled shlt out of your ass, like they can stop if there is no residual urine. Something that you won't even address anymore.

Don't ever try to talk about what I get, because clearly I get more of this than you do. The DCO is REQUIRED to get a sample that is within the required range. If a sample doesn't meet it, he gives that sample to the lab anyway, and STILL GETS A SAMPLE THAT MEETS THE REQUIRED RANGE.

Go read something and stop spreading lies.

I told you about thinking you're more knowledgeable than others. That's why you always make an ass of yourself.

So what about that residual urine, huh? Do they stop the session if there is none?

So before USADA was a LIAR and now you are calling them a moron!!!


Go read again what USADA said. They are NOT saying what you are saying!!!


USADA clearly uses the word "MAY BE". So that means that there are times where the DCO doesn't get any acceptable Specific Gravity readings from the samples and sends only those off to the LABs.

This one is going to be tough for you to DEFLECT. You are in far too deep!!!




and even WADA has a statement:

"The DCO may end the Sample Collection Session if:
a. None of the Samples collected from the Athlete meet the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis; and
b. The DCO determines that for logistical reasons it is impossible to continue"



So I am right. There are circumstances where the DCO sends to the LAB only samples that do not even meet Suitable Specific Gravity.



.