Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

Show me where that is written into the code because you just tried to pass off what WADA was trying to implement, not what was implemented jimcarey, learn to comprehend gimp

What the **** are you talking about, you moron. Haven't I proven over and over that you're an idiot. LMAO.


It's in the ****ing code, you buffoon.

Models of Best Practice and Guidelines
Models of best practice and guidelines based on the Code and International Standards have been and will be developed to provide solutions in different areas of anti-doping. The models and guidelines will be recommended by Wada and made available to Signatories and other relevant stakeholders, but will not be mandatory. in addition to providing models of anti-doping documentation, Wada will also make some training assistance available to the Signatories.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...oping-code.pdf

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. WHAT YOU GOTTA SAY NOW???

[travestyny]

will be recommended hahahahaha

lmaooooooo. Now go find out what recommended means. Lmaoooooooooo!!!!


log...the ****...outtttt!!!!!

[travestyny]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18154135]

14.1.2 Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to national anti-doping organizations, international Federations and Wada
The anti-doping organization with results management responsibility shall also notify the athlete’s national anti-doping organization, international Federation and Wada of the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation simultaneously with the notice to the athlete or other Person.-----------------this rules USADA doesn't have to worry about, it's omitted from the contract, they don't have to follow it

Sorry, this is like beating up a dead fish, but I can't help it.

You're pointing out WADA code 14.1.2 and saying that it isn't covered? But did you look at 14.1.1??? LMAOOO

14.1 Information Concerning Adverse Analytical Findings, Atypical Findings, and other Asserted Anti-Doping Rule Violations
14.1.1 Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to athletes and other Persons
The form and manner of notice of an asserted anti-doping rule violation shall be as provided in the rules of the anti-doping organization with results management responsibility.

LMAOOOOOO. THIS PORTION, EVEN ACCORDING TO WADA, COMES FROM USADA'S RULES. AND IN THE CONTRACT IT POINTS TO USADA RULES WHERE THIS IS FOUND, DUMMY:

CONTRACT:

Mayweather and Pacquiao agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17a, and 21 of the United States Anti-Doping Agency Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any Results Management Services provided hereunder.

Well well well. Look at #11 in the USADA Protocol

b. Upon receipt from the laboratory of an A Sample Adverse Analytical Finding USADA will promptly conduct a review to determine whether an applicable The****utic Use Exemption (“TUE”) has been granted or will be granted or there is any apparent departure from the ISTI or ISL that caused the Adverse Analytical Finding. If this review does not reveal an applicable TUE or departure from the applicable standards, USADA will promptly notify, as appropriate,
the USOC, NGB, IF, WADA and other sports organization, Event organizer or ADO for which USADA conducted the test and the Athlete at the address on the Whereabouts Filing on file, or if no form is on file, at the address on the DCOR and shall advise the Athlete of the date, time and place on which the laboratory will conduct the B Sample analysis. The Athlete may attend the B Sample analysis accompanied by a representative, or may have a representative appear on his or her behalf, at the expense of the Athlete. Except as provided in sections 14 and 15 of this Protocol, prior to the B Sample opening,
USADA shall provide to the Athlete the A Sample laboratory documentation as set forth in Annex B, and copies of the Protocol and the Code. In any correspondence offering the Athlete the opportunity to waive Testing of the B Sample, USADA shall include the language set forth in Annex E.
As more fully explained in section 14 below, in all cases where an Athlete
has been notified of an anti-doping rule violation that does not result in a mandatory Provisional Suspension under Article 7.9.1 of the Code, the Athlete shall be offered the opportunity to accept a Provisional Suspension pending the resolution of the matter.
https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...A_protocol.pdf

YOU HAVE NOTHING LEFT!

R.I.P.

[koolkc107]

Trying to reason with Ship-out is like drag racing your car vs a ****** on a Big Wheel.

Hell yes, you are going to win over and over again, easily.

But, then you realize...WTF is the point?

[Shape up]

[QUOTE=travestyny;18154409]

Sorry, this is like beating up a dead fish, but I can't help it.

You're pointing out WADA code 14.1.2 and saying that it isn't covered? But did you look at 14.1.1??? LMAOOO




LMAOOOOOO. THIS PORTION, EVEN ACCORDING TO WADA, COMES FROM USADA'S RULES. AND IN THE CONTRACT IT POINTS TO USADA RULES WHERE THIS IS FOUND, DUMMY:

CONTRACT:



Well well well. Look at #11 in the USADA Protocol

YOU HAVE NOTHING LEFT!

R.I.P.

I will try and explain this in very simple terms, you said look at 14.1.1, is 14.1.1 between numbers 1 through 10, if it doesn't fall in that range then it isn't a rule they are following. Your really not bright

[Shape up]

[QUOTE=travestyny;18154409]

Sorry, this is like beating up a dead fish, but I can't help it.

You're pointing out WADA code 14.1.2 and saying that it isn't covered? But did you look at 14.1.1??? LMAOOO




LMAOOOOOO. THIS PORTION, EVEN ACCORDING TO WADA, COMES FROM USADA'S RULES. AND IN THE CONTRACT IT POINTS TO USADA RULES WHERE THIS IS FOUND, DUMMY:

CONTRACT:



Well well well. Look at #11 in the USADA Protocol

YOU HAVE NOTHING LEFT!

R.I.P.

have a look at rule 5 in the contract jim Carey, if protocol conflicts with the contract then the contract over rules the protocol, face it, you've lost, I've embarrassed you over and over again, all you do is write rants with no information to back your arguements, if you were right lil Robbie b and larry would be here arguing against me in a flash, but we hear crickets from them

[travestyny]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18155219]

I will try and explain this in very simple terms, you said look at 14.1.1, is 14.1.1 between numbers 1 through 10, if it doesn't fall in that range then it isn't a rule they are following. Your really not bright

You idiot. The WADA CODE says the rule comes from USADA, and so does the contract you idiot


You are by far the biggest moron on this site. Go cry in a ditch.

[travestyny]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18155252]

have a look at rule 5 in the contract jim Carey, if protocol conflicts with the contract then the contract over rules the protocol, face it, you've lost, I've embarrassed you over and over again, all you do is write rants with no information to back your arguements, if you were right lil Robbie b and larry would be here arguing against me in a flash, but we hear crickets from them

Again, let’s make a perma ban bet. I’d be happy to get you kicked off this site.

The rule you are looking for is provided by USADA, dumb a$s. And it doesn’t conflict with the WADA CODE.

Perma ban bet? Yes or no?

[Shape up]

I thought genuinely you were simple but after that last post I'm thinking it has to be much worse, such as serious brain damage or drug psychosis, how is it a USADA rule

[Shape up]

Also can you explain in your words what rule 4 in the contract means to you, this should be a laugh and a half