Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [QUOTE=Shape up;18154109]
    Originally posted by Shape up View Post
    From the contract----------- Rules 4 mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2 and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code shall be the substantive anti doping rules for all purposes in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement---------now let's look at the definition of substantive again, HAVING A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE--------- so the contract says that articles 1-10 and 24.2 from the WADA code have a SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE from all the other anti doping rules FOR ALL PURPOSES IN RELATION TO THE COMPETITION---------IS THIS CORRECT WEASELS, a simple yes or no
    It's all here in a legal binding contract, WADA didn't get involved because legally they would not have a leg to stand on, just like you

    Comment


    • ive seen your movie, LIAR LIAR

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
        ive seen your movie, LIAR LIAR
        You're a moron.

        What rule did they break? Go ahead and tell us so I can embarrass you again.

        Comment


        • [QUOTE=Shape up;18154294]
          Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          It's all here in a legal binding contract, WADA didn't get involved because legally they would not have a leg to stand on, just like you
          ONE THRU 10 ARE THE MOST SUBSTANTIVE....FOR ANTI-DOPING RULES YOU MORON!!!! LMAOOOO

          Comment


          • Go back and read the definition of substantive jim carey

            Comment


            • By the way...just found more proof that I was right and you were wrong. Remember you kept talking about how it had to be done in a medical setting. I kept telling you that was only "BEST PRACTICE" and it doesn't mean it has to happen. You didn't believe me did you, you sack of shlt.

              3. Medical best practice treatment
              Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with either medical emergencies or in-patient care.

              When an IV infusion is administered to an athlete, the following criteria should be fulfilled:
              1. A clearly defined diagnosis.
              2. Supportive evidence that no permitted alternative treatment can be
              used.
              3. The treatment has been ordered by a physician and administered by
              qualified medical personnel in an appropriate medical setting.
              4. Adequate medical records of the treatment.
              Well what do you see here in the WADA Code?

              Models of Best Practice and Guidelines

              Models of best practice and guidelines based on the Code and International Standards have been and will be developed to provide solutions in different areas of anti-doping. The models and guidelines will be recommended by Wada and made available to Signatories and other relevant stakeholders, but will not be mandatory. in addition to providing models of anti-doping documentation, Wada will also make some training assistance available to the Signatories.

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. YOU KEEP LOSING!!!

              Comment


              • [QUOTE=Shape up;18154109]
                Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                From the contract----------- Rules 4 mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2 and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code shall be the substantive anti doping rules for all purposes in relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement---------now let's look at the definition of substantive again, HAVING A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE--------- so the contract says that articles 1-10 and 24.2 from the WADA code have a SEPARATE AND INDEPENDANT EXISTANCE from all the other anti doping rules FOR ALL PURPOSES IN RELATION TO THE COMPETITION---------IS THIS CORRECT WEASELS, a simple yes or no
                Explain in your words what this part of the contract means and how come they only used certain articles of the WADA code and not the code in its entirety

                Comment


                • [QUOTE=Shape up;18154321]
                  Originally posted by Shape up View Post

                  Explain in your words what this part of the contract means and how come they only used certain articles of the WADA code and not the code in its entirety
                  I won't explain it. I'LL LET THE CONTRACT EXPLAIN IT, YOU MORON!

                  International Standards adopted pursuant to the Code are applicable as specified in this Agreement or otherwise provided in the Code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent that they do not conflict with the terms of this Agreement.
                  They didn't only use certain parts, you dope. They specifically say which parts of the code are to be followed FOR ANTI-DOPING RULES. The rest of the code is not about ANTI-DOPING RULES, and anything else in the contract FOLLOWS THE RULES SET OUT BY WADA.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                    By the way...just found more proof that I was right and you were wrong. Remember you kept talking about how it had to be done in a medical setting. I kept telling you that was only "BEST PRACTICE" and it doesn't mean it has to happen. You didn't believe me did you, you sack of shlt.



                    Well what do you see here in the WADA Code?




                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. YOU KEEP LOSING!!!
                    Show me where that is written into the code because you just tried to pass off what WADA was trying to implement, not what was implemented jimcarey, learn to comprehend gimp

                    Comment


                    • will be recommended hahahahaha

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP