Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

Wow! Shape just put a big fat black hole of truth that can't be sealed by any Floyd jizzguzzler. Truth is out!

Shape up already got ran out of this thread. Maybe you should try reading before you get those pom poms out.

[elfag]

99% of pro fighters are on PEDs. Whoever your favorite fighter is, he is on PEDs. Its pointless to argue about.

Mosley never tested positive, he got busted by a paper trail. Lance Armstrong never tested positive, he finally admitted it after too many team mates were calling him out. All those guys calling him out were also on PEDs.

lol @ people thinking they can tell if someone is on PEDs by looks alone. Fat ass James Toney was on PEDs. There is no PED body type every fighter is on them and they should just legalize them in pro sports because everyone does them anyways.

[Shape up]

Shape up already got ran out of this thread. Maybe you should try reading before you get those pom poms out.

Nah, I'm just waiting for you to answer the questions I've asked instead of the usual reply ISTUE doe, ISTUE doesn't over rule anything, rules state the TUE needed to be prior, rule for combat dehydration is it MUST be monitored by wada, it wasn't, you haven't answered ****. You need to learn English and comprehend what is written

[travestyny]

Nah, I'm just waiting for you to answer the questions I've asked instead of the usual reply ISTUE doe, ISTUE doesn't over rule anything, rules state the TUE needed to be prior, rule for combat dehydration is it MUST be monitored by wada, it wasn't, you haven't answered ****. You need to learn English and comprehend what is written

Bltch, didn't I embarrass you enough.


At every turn you got shot the **** down, and you ran off and didn't answer any of my questions because you know you were proven a moron.

You can't even get quotations right. Get the **** out of here. You're an absolute idiot and I think you know that by now.

Or, you can answer the question. How did he dilute his sample if it was checked for dilution by two separate en******.

oh that's right, he diluted by making it more concentrated, right? You ****ing imbecile. Go find some help, then come back and try again.

[travestyny]

so the IV doesn't fill the bladder with fluid as drinking water does, giving you a much more concentrated urine sample

Ya dumb bltch!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Wow. The ultimate Deflector, who was here every single day lurking, but still refuses to answer the 8 questions that I gave him, finally had the nerve to post again after the dust was all settled and the thread was finally ready to die, as the OP completely stumped all the Floyd haters.

What a surprise. You been hiding from my questions, ADP02. "Say it ain't so!"

Have you ever heard that term? It's pretty popular in sports. "Say it ain't so!"

That's what you're trying to play on without having any insight about me, just more assumptions. Here is the thing:

1. I have never said an athlete using PED's is impossible. This was all completely made up by you. I've already asked you to quote me on this. You never did....because it was completely fabricated by you. If you have further information on this, please quote me regarding where I specifically said that an athlete using PED's, including Floyd Mayweather, is impossible. I may have said specific ways or methods for him to do so is impossible, but I don't even recall that. If you can post up a quotation so I can see specifically what you are referring to, I'll be happy to explain. Both the OP and I have gone on record saying that IF IT WAS PROVEN, AND WE HAD THE PROOF, WE'D BE ON THE PHONE YESTERDAY TRYING TO TELL WHOMEVER THE HIGHEST BIDDER IS. And I mean that. A cheat is a cheat is a cheat, and should be exposed no matter who it is.

DEFLECT? LOL

Busy working OT ... just checking in but as you know, it's not a one liner response.

YOU ARE THE DEFLECTOR!!!!




Here we go:
I agree. You are not saying that (It is IMPOSSIBLE) when it comes to other athletes. You just post that way when it comes to your hero, Floyd Mayweather.

BUT you DEFLECTED ....

It's not just about the possibility about using PEDs but you go much further than that with Floyd. You keep on bringing up that having others help Floyd with his cheating is IMPOSSIBLE. This key part, you conveniently DEFLECTED!!! Man, I just read your posts now and you did it again!


Lance, his teammates, his doctor, his trainers, the UCI and others were in on it ....

So the question to you was,
If you were a Lance Armstrong fan, would you be stating that Lance couldn't have had that help? Are you going to say that it was all IMPOSSIBLE?

2. However, do I believe that the chance that he cheated is so minuscule that the accusation is literally not worth a piece of shlt. Absolutely. Feel free to quote me on that. It's as close to impossible as you can get, though knowing myself, it is extremely rare for me to say that something is flat out impossible, and that's why I've told you to quote me on that.

Miniscule?
Floyd actually admitted to taking 2 banned IV bags!!! This was actually worse that Lance Armstrong's case given what was known at the time!



BTW - You have nothing on Manny but you have no problem saying that he used. The A side Manny didn't want to bend over backwards when Floyd and company ACCUSSED Manny of taking PEDs. Not unusual considering that even Golden Boy did the exact same thing with when Zab Judah requested Mosley take drug tests .... and Mosley actually did admit to taking PEDs.

3. Now the point. You want to know if I were a huge Lance Armstrong fan, would I believe that him cheating (I'll change this up a bit for you) is so close to being impossible as Floyd Mayweather cheating. Again, you're making a huge assumption about me. I'm not a blind fanboy, much like yourself (and if I'm making a huge assumption about you, feel free to correct me on that). Sure we all have a bit of "say it ain't so" in us, but the way I've always handled every situation is simple. WAIT UNTIL ALL OF THE RELEVANT INFORMATION HAS COME OUT. When the information about the IV came out, I did not immediately go running around posting that it was all over nothing. To the contrary, I waited for more information. Sure I lean to one side of a controversial situation, but I always reserve judgement as all of the information comes out. I didn't want to believe that Marion Jones was cheating, but I always believed she was guilty, and it turns out that after all the information came out, she was. I didn't want to believe that Barry Bonds was cheating. I remember being asked about him BEFORE all of the information came out. My response: "Look at how the size of his head has changed. In my opinion he is clearly doping, but we have to wait until all of the information comes out." With regards to Pacquiao, believe it or not, I don't hate him and never have. Do I believe he was doping. Yes, I do. All of the excuses his team made up for him and his refusal to be tested/his concern with being tested 14 days before the fight both lead to me believing he was doping. Do I claim to know for sure? Absolutely not. Ask me for proof -- I have none. Do I believe, based on a prior event, that he might have been on Toradol for some of his fights? ABSOLUTELY! However, he never failed a test. I'm not worried about it. Hell, even about OJ Simpson. I didn't believe he killed his wife....not until they showed that he said he didn't own the Bruno Magli shoes, and then they showed a picture of him in them. Ok. Guilty.

"WAIT UNTIL ALL OF THE RELEVANT INFORMATION HAS COME OUT."

but your accusations of Manny taking PEDs is based on Manny not agreeing to a negotiation!!!!

While we have Floyd using BANNED METHOD but here you say you are sure that Floyd didn't cheat?

4. Lance Armstrong(the great Deflection by you): This is a bit hard to discuss because A) I'm not a fan of cycling. B) We would have to go back to the times that these events were coming out and LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. What we do know is that he received a retro TUE from his doctor, but EVEN THIS WAS AGAINST THE PERTINENT RULES. The UCI rules state that if you are found guilty of doping, you are NOT allowed to then show a prescription for what was found. THIS IS IN THEIR RULE BOOK. So right away, whether it was malicious or not: GUILTY! BOTTOM LINE. END OF THE STORY!



We all can only judge a situation based on the information that is out there. That's what any logical person does. We've looked at all of the information that is out there. It has been explained in this post over and over and over again. The fact that none of the haters can challenge the OP is the ultimate proof that there is nothing to suggest Floyd Mayweather was cheating.

A. Logically, it makes no sense.
B. It is FAR DIFFERENT FROM THE LANCE ARMSTRONG CASE (if you stop ducking my questions, you will be FORCED to admit the same thing. Stop ducking!)
C. The evidence to the contrary falls so far short of the goal that it's not even worthy of discussing.

Of your questions, the one that you are leaning on the hardest being a deflection to Lance Armstrong should reveal to you that this is much ado about nothing. The farthest you guys can get, which I will acknowledge, is that we don't have information about Floyd Mayweather's physical condition at the time of the IV. You can bring up NSAC and their physical, which is fine, but you refuse to acknowledge that it is ABSOLUTELY ABSURD THAT SINCE THE NSAC EXISTED, THERE IS NO PROOF OF THEM EVER FINDING EVEN ONE ATHLETE TO BE DEHYDRATED BASED ON THEIR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, AND WE BOTH KNOW DAMN WELL THAT IN BOXING, A BEVY OF ATHLETES HAVE BEEN DEHYDRATED DURING THEIR NSAC PHYSICALS. Am I wrong? If so, let me know. So once that is established, all we have is the medical records, which of course by the rules will never be released. So hey, you are very free to speculate based on that, because that is something that we both will likely never see....

And honestly, that is irrelevant to me. I don't care if USADA allowed him to take an IV, one that was not against the NSAC rules, might I add. What's important to me is...WAS HE TAKING PED'S! That is the meat of this issue. Now when you look at all of the evidence that he was, which by the way turns out to be ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, NOTHING, RIEN, 아무것도.....Then well, sorry. The reason that only you and I are discussing this, let's be honest, is because you are extremely hurt that Manny Pacquiao lost. There's not much more to see here. But....


PLEASE ANSWER MY QUESTIONS. STOP DUCKING. I'M REALLY INTERESTED IN YOUR ANSWERS. (This is maybe the fourth time that I've answered your questions, and I've been waiting for you to answer mine a long time. Be a man and do it!)

Just like with Floyd's BS there was BS surrounding Lance but as I stated, given the facts provided back then, Lance was less guilty than Floyd. Floyd admitted to taking a banned method.

Lance's case was more excusable without the BS which we know of now. END OF STORY!!!





Lets add a few more points:

5. We have lots of info that indicates that Floyd was not extremely dehydrated to the point that he had to use banned IVs instead of what the rule books state that Floyd should have used .... drink fluids, which Floyd did!!!


The head of WADA TUE Committee says that it's a "red flag", "smells bad", "murky world" and that Floyd should have just used the alternative to IVs just like the physician prescribes in such cases that are not URGENT.

Floyd was not rushed to the hospital and instead was giving interviews and boasting that he doesn't get drained like others who need to dehydrate their bodies 15-20lbs!!! Even Floyd knows the TRUTH and what is meant by being dehydrated .... well, until he needs to make some BS excuse. lol



6. You say that RETRO TUE process was thoroughly vetted? WHAT? Your statements is what is absurd!!!

3 TUEC members, that USADA establishes based their verdict on Lance's, I mean, Floyd's doctor's note!!!

How about:
NSAC would have showed Floyd's pre-fight form, examination, vital signs .... nowhere was there any notes that would indicate extreme dehydration but just as important, if USADA would have done it's thorough vetting as admitted that it should do for RETRO TUEs, they would have gotten the same info from the NSAC physician!!!!




7.

And honestly, that is irrelevant to me. I don't care if USADA allowed him to take an IV, one that was not against the NSAC rules, might I add. What's important to me is...WAS HE TAKING PED'S!

That is not what you said about Lance Amrstrong!!!! LOL ..... Floyd actually used a BANNED METHOD!!!!
It's there in the rule books!!!

Also, USADA does NOT need to base it only on if they catch Floyd with PEDs! There are several ways that they can catch a cheat! With other athletes, they can actually buy their story but at the end of the day, USADA would still say, "Thanks for being honest with us and we believe you so we will only give you 6 months suspension for being uneducated instead of the usual 2 years suspension."


From what I see, Floyd more than likely did this before! USADA had to let us know this time due to the contract or else, they would have hidden all this.

Floyd called a Paramedic?
I doubt very much this was a paramedic from a hospital. Actually, this has all the signs of being one of those clinics that sell "hydration" for hangovers or other reasons.

Urgent situations would be giving him the usual IVs not these "Vitamin" IVs! and who knows what else was in those IVs!!! Floyd had this clinic on his speed dial. These are the guys giving Floyd's doctor's note or did they pay some other Dr such as Dr Alex Ariza, who Floyd thanked!


.

[travestyny]

DEFLECT? LOL

Busy working OT ... just checking in but as you know, it's not a one liner response.

YOU ARE THE DEFLECTOR!!!!




Here we go:
I agree. You are not saying that (It is IMPOSSIBLE) when it comes to other athletes. You just post that way when it comes to your hero, Floyd Mayweather.

BUT you DEFLECTED ....

It's not just about the possibility about using PEDs but you go much further than that with Floyd. You keep on bringing up that having others help Floyd with his cheating is IMPOSSIBLE. This key part, you conveniently DEFLECTED!!! Man, I just read your posts now and you did it again!


Lance, his teammates, his doctor, his trainers, the UCI and others were in on it ....

So the question to you was,
If you were a Lance Armstrong fan, would you be stating that Lance couldn't have had that help? Are you going to say that it was all IMPOSSIBLE?








Miniscule?
Floyd actually admitted to taking 2 banned IV bags!!! This was actually worse that Lance Armstrong's case given what was known at the time!



BTW - You have nothing on Manny but you have no problem saying that he used. The A side Manny didn't want to bend over backwards when Floyd and company ACCUSSED Manny of taking PEDs. Not unusual considering that even Golden Boy did the exact same thing with when Zab Judah requested Mosley take drug tests .... and Mosley actually did admit to taking PEDs.





"WAIT UNTIL ALL OF THE RELEVANT INFORMATION HAS COME OUT."

but your accusations of Manny taking PEDs is based on Manny not agreeing to a negotiation!!!!

While we have Floyd using BANNED METHOD but here you say you are sure that Floyd didn't cheat?







Just like with Floyd's BS there was BS surrounding Lance but as I stated, given the facts provided back then, Lance was less guilty than Floyd. Floyd admitted to taking a banned method.

Lance's case was more excusable without the BS which we know of now. END OF STORY!!!





Lets add a few more points:

5. We have lots of info that indicates that Floyd was not extremely dehydrated to the point that he had to use banned IVs instead of what the rule books state that Floyd should have used .... drink fluids, which Floyd did!!!


The head of WADA TUE Committee says that it's a "red flag", "smells bad", "murky world" and that Floyd should have just used the alternative to IVs just like the physician prescribes in such cases that are not URGENT.

Floyd was not rushed to the hospital and instead was giving interviews and boasting that he doesn't get drained like others who need to dehydrate their bodies 15-20lbs!!! Even Floyd knows the TRUTH and what is meant by being dehydrated .... well, until he needs to make some BS excuse. lol



6. You say that RETRO TUE process was thoroughly vetted? WHAT? Your statements is what is absurd!!!

3 TUEC members, that USADA establishes based their verdict on Lance's, I mean, Floyd's doctor's note!!!

How about:
NSAC would have showed Floyd's pre-fight form, examination, vital signs .... nowhere was there any notes that would indicate extreme dehydration but just as important, if USADA would have done it's thorough vetting as admitted that it should do for RETRO TUEs, they would have gotten the same info from the NSAC physician!!!!




7.


That is not what you said about Lance Amrstrong!!!! LOL ..... Floyd actually used a BANNED METHOD!!!!
It's there in the rule books!!!

Also, USADA does NOT need to base it only on if they catch Floyd with PEDs! There are several ways that they can catch a cheat! With other athletes, they can actually buy their story but at the end of the day, USADA would still say, "Thanks for being honest with us and we believe you so we will only give you 6 months suspension for being uneducated instead of the usual 2 years suspension."


From what I see, Floyd more than likely did this before! USADA had to let us know this time due to the contract or else, they would have hidden all this.

Floyd called a Paramedic?
I doubt very much this was a paramedic from a hospital. Actually, this has all the signs of being one of those clinics that sell "hydration" for hangovers or other reasons.

Urgent situations would be giving him the usual IVs not these "Vitamin" IVs! and who knows what else was in those IVs!!! Floyd had this clinic on his speed dial. These are the guys giving Floyd's doctor's note or did they pay some other Dr such as Dr Alex Ariza, who Floyd thanked!


.

So....YOU HAD TIME TO TYPE ALL OF THAT BULLSHlT, AND STILL NO TIME TO ANSWER ANY OF MY QUESTIONS, HUH?


WHY ARE YOU DEFLECTING? ONCE AGAIN I ANSWERED ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, AND YOU DON'T LIKE MY ANSWERS SO YOU CLAIM THAT I DEFLECTED. BlTCH MOVE, SON. .


YET....YOU WON'T EVEN STEP UP TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS.


STILL WAITING!!! ANSWER MY ****ING QUESTIONS!!!!

[travestyny]

So the question to you was,
If you were a Lance Armstrong fan, would you be stating that Lance couldn't have had that help? [COLOR="Blue"][B][SIZE="3"]Are you going to say that it was all IMPOSSIBLE?

Are you slow? Didn't I answer this already.


Let me make it even more clear for you.

It was NOT impossible for Lance because there were less restrictions in place at that time.

It was nearly impossible for Floyd because there were more restrictions at that time.

Now once you get the balls to answer my questions, we can discuss those restrictions and you can explain to me how he could have done it, because right now all you do is duck and deflect.

ANSWER THE QUESTIONS, ADP02. STOP DUCKING ME!

[ADP02]

We've been through this already. This is a brick thrown at every boxer in the game except for Nonito Donaire. Right? But when it comes to the situation under discussion, you duck and deflect away from the tough question:

If Floyd Mayweather used PED's in the time before training camp and then cycled off, why the **** would he try to mask PED use the day before the fight? How do you reconcile this? It makes no sense at all and what you are posting here is a direct contradiction of your argument!



No, actually it doesn't sound familiar. I've been waiting for you to answer my questions to further get into Lance's retro TUE vs. Floyd's retro TUE. ANSWER MY ****ING QUESTION SO I CAN SHOW YOU HOW ****** YOU ARE TO EVEN COMPARE THE TWO.



Whose side are you on. Novitsky, who by the way has sided with USADA on this case (which thoroughly shlts on you trying to use him to advance your agenda), made this pretty damn clear.

Here is what he said, SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO FLOYD MAYWEATHER'S CASE:



With regards to the time, how much time do you think 3 medical experts need to determine if an athlete should be allowed to use saline and vitamins??? Especially if the ****ing DCO was present when it was being given, and a urine sample from BEFORE and AFTER the IV were taken. Do you think they need weeks or months for that? Give me a ****ing break!

[/B]

I would think that 2 days is more than enough time for 3 ****ing medical experts to determine if someone can have some saline and to vet the circumstances to feel confident that the athlete wasn't cheating, don't you think? If not, I think you need to find some new doctors.


By the way, I'll repost my questions for you that you are so desperately ducking. Try not to deflect when you answer, you hear?

In that post, you said that USADA cannot do differently and I responded that USADA can and does ..... and that with Floyd, he is the only one who knows in his fights when the TESTs STARTs and ENDs .... even Floyd's opponents are not sure exactly as they are waiting for Floyd to agree to the contract and sign. With Berto, it was after 39 days!


No contradictions.

We do not know exactly which drug Floyd was trying to hide. We just know that he tried to delay testing and then used an IV to delay even further! As I pointed out in the past, Floyd was NOT expecting to be tested at so close to the fight. So he did like some other cheats and used while being sure that he does not come back positive on the final test after the fight. Once the DCO showed up, Floyd and company was stalling as long as possible. They were not sure if their PED would come up negative and hopefully with the delays, it would all be good .... Getting a couple of IVs delayed even further and would have diluted the urine enough to bring down the concentration to below the range of detection or "threshold".

Some PEDs are out of your system in hours, some days, some more than that. It could be that Floyd took PEDs the day before or a few days before but as I said, Floyd wasn't expecting to be tested and was worried that he would come back positive.


There is NO WAY that Floyd was extremely dehydrated. I gave you enough stats on this for you to realize that it makes no sense (Floyd's BS that he was extremely dehydrated). How can you be extremely dehydrated due to his BS excuses and come in weight as he always does and admits to making weight EASILY for a DECADE!!!

I see in another post you used stats
but
when it comes to Floyd being hydrated, your math becomes like someone who plays ignorant!!! LOL ... DEFLECTOR is what I call it!


------------------------------------------


Answer? I've answered it in the past. Some is even posted by me today. What more do you want?



What? Novitsky though said it takes weeks if not months to thoroughly vet and he was being asked questions about a case concerning banned method that so happens to be about IVs!!!

In that case it took a while and also in the other IV cases it took time. Novitsky said that the vetting process is thorough and is NOT just having 3 medical experts read a doctor's note. What you bring up is NOT what he called a thorough vetting process.
That is what you do when you want to have someone get away with cheating a la Lance Armstrong when he gave his doctor's BS medical note!!!! You just do not like Novitsky's response!



DCO? LOL ... he is the source of everything now? DCO is not the one who examined Floyd. Floyd was examined by several doctors, Columbo!!! Start the vetting process with that! Then check out the vital signs. Floyd consistent weight for 30 days! for a decade according to ..... FLOYD!!!!

USADA

So Floyd your weight last week was 148 then went down how much and you say that you were extremely dehydrated? Even after we see you on video drinking away like you did?"

USADA

Floyd we did a thorough investigation. You know, like we do with the other athletes.

We had lots of videos including interviews by you, the weigh-in, you boasting that you come in at relatively the same weight for a decade. You saying that you are going to RELAX on the FINAL days .... It took time but there is more .... we got a hold of your vitals, went and interviewed the NSAC, HBO, Showtime, friends, .... nobody said that you were severely dehydrated!!!!

Floyd, did you read what USADA, NSAC, WADA has to say about what to do if you lose a measly 2lbs? Drink a couple of cups of water and you are good to go! Yet you expect us to believe your BS?

Floyd, for years you didn't believe that blood makes you weak enough to faint but here you are saying that after 10 days it contributed, plus urinating 4 days prior in a cup contributed plus you RELAXING on the FINAL DAYs made you extremely dehydrated?

Of course Novitsky would say that about USADA because he is the one who just hired USADA for his company .... but as you read, there is supposed to be a thorough vetting process. Floyd was NOT vetted. Floyd got the RETRO TUE on his lap the next freaking day!!! Just enough time to fabricate the RETRO TUE certificate! LOL


but you also DEFLECT.
Novitsky's statement gives the impression that you can get a RETRO TUE if you made a mistake and forgot to present information about banned substances until way later after the event .... that is like Lance providing a late medical note. BOTH are dumb and wrong .... but Novistky's statement is worse since its circa 2015/2016 and it's USADA who is implementing this ******ed view!





.

[Kigali]

In that post, you said that USADA cannot do differently and I responded that USADA can and does ..... and that with Floyd, he is the only one who knows in his fights when the TESTs STARTs and ENDs .... even Floyd's opponents are not sure exactly as they are waiting for Floyd to agree to the contract and sign. With Berto, it was after 39 days!


No contradictions.

We do not know exactly which drug Floyd was trying to hide. We just know that he tried to delay testing and then used an IV to delay even further! As I pointed out in the past, Floyd was NOT expecting to be tested at so close to the fight. So he did like some other cheats and used while being sure that he does not come back positive on the final test after the fight. Once the DCO showed up, Floyd and company was stalling as long as possible. They were not sure if their PED would come up negative and hopefully with the delays, it would all be good .... Getting a couple of IVs delayed even further and would have diluted the urine enough to bring down the concentration to below the range of detection or "threshold".

Some PEDs are out of your system in hours, some days, some more than that. It could be that Floyd took PEDs the day before or a few days before but as I said, Floyd wasn't expecting to be tested and was worried that he would come back positive.


There is NO WAY that Floyd was extremely dehydrated. I gave you enough stats on this for you to realize that it makes no sense (Floyd's BS that he was extremely dehydrated). How can you be extremely dehydrated due to his BS excuses and come in weight as he always does and admits to making weight EASILY for a DECADE!!!

I see in another post you used stats
but
when it comes to Floyd being hydrated, your math becomes like someone who plays ignorant!!! LOL ... DEFLECTOR is what I call it!


------------------------------------------


Answer? I've answered it in the past. Some is even posted by me today. What more do you want?



What? Novitsky though said it takes weeks if not months to thoroughly vet and he was being asked questions about a case concerning banned method that so happens to be about IVs!!!

In that case it took a while and also in the other IV cases it took time. Novitsky said that the vetting process is thorough and is NOT just having 3 medical experts read a doctor's note. What you bring up is NOT what he called a thorough vetting process.
That is what you do when you want to have someone get away with cheating a la Lance Armstrong when he gave his doctor's BS medical note!!!! You just do not like Novitsky's response!



DCO? LOL ... he is the source of everything now? DCO is not the one who examined Floyd. Floyd was examined by several doctors, Columbo!!! Start the vetting process with that! Then check out the vital signs. Floyd consistent weight for 30 days! for a decade according to ..... FLOYD!!!!








Of course Novitsky would say that about USADA because he is the one who just hired USADA for his company .... but as you read, there is supposed to be a thorough vetting process. Floyd was NOT vetted. Floyd got the RETRO TUE on his lap the next freaking day!!! Just enough time to fabricate the RETRO TUE certificate! LOL


but you also DEFLECT.
Novitsky's statement gives the impression that you can get a RETRO TUE if you made a mistake and forgot to present information about banned substances until way later after the event .... that is like Lance providing a late medical note. BOTH are dumb and wrong .... but Novistky's statement is worse since its circa 2015/2016 and it's USADA who is implementing this ******ed view!





.

There is something wrong with you.