Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • djtmal
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 12266
    • 1,200
    • 11
    • 39,097

    #371
    Originally posted by Kigali
    Says a jealous hater with 0 life.
    Says the dude who probably sits up day and night, squatting for me to say something.

    Comment

    • djtmal
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 12266
      • 1,200
      • 11
      • 39,097

      #372
      Originally posted by travestyny
      Instead of chiming in with nothing, why not join the discussion and explain? Unless that is, you have no comeback for the OP. I think in reality, you have no reply for the thread starter, and that seems to make you mad.
      why would i waste my time, none of yous can really prove jack...

      Comment

      • maracho
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2012
        • 1642
        • 51
        • 0
        • 12,577

        #373
        Originally posted by koolkc107
        Cong**** on not answering anything I asked in that post.

        Try again.

        Tell me how the methods cyclist used could be adapted to boxing.

        See, your argument seems to be that the cheaters are ahead of the testers so therefore we should assume Floyd was cheating.

        I asked you how.

        Microdosing won't work for a boxer out of camp (not being tested) because the effects wear off too fast.

        Microdosing won't work in camp because boxers have no prior notice of when they have to do blood or urine and would never know when they could do so without being tested immediately (or while the PED was still in their system).

        The one thing of merit about your post is that you are correct about them still having the samples- and that those samples could be retested anytime with newer and better methods.

        Knowing this, why would a fighter who is worried about his legacy in the sport risk tarnishing it by cheating and having evidence of it sitting there ad infinitum?

        I am guessing that just like every other poster who has tried, you will have no real answer for this.

        But, thanks for playing...
        A huge portion of AfroAmerican hall of fame boxers over the last few generations have been caught but their legacies remain intact.

        Just because he hasnt been fully caught doesn't mean he's innocent. I say If you cheat on your spouse(s) and/or concubines, youll cheat in the ring. Do I think Pacquiao cheated too yes he probably did


        Take it from the Ped pros

        “USADA’s boxing testing program is propaganda; that’s all,” ..It has one set of rules for some fighters and a different set of rules for others."says Victor Conte.

        The day before his fight against Manny Pacquiao, Floyd Mayweather took two intravenous infusions totaling 750 milliliters. The bags contained mixtures of saline and vitamins, but their contents are irrelevant: any IVs over 50 mL are strictly banned. The Nevada State Athletic Commission, which sanctioned the fight, did not learn of the IV until three weeks after the fight—by which time Mayweather had already sought and received an exemption from his favored drug-testing agency.
        It’s bizarre,” Don Catlin says with regard to the retroactive the****utic use exemption that USADA granted to Mayweather. .. USADA has yet to explain to my satisfaction why Mayweather needed an IV infusion. There might be a valid explanation, but I don’t know what it is.”

        "I don’t get it,” Conte says. “There are strict criteria for the granting of a TUE. You don’t hand them out like Halloween candy. And this sort of IV use is clearly against the rules."

        Mayweather’s testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the April 3, 2013, sample was 0.80. His testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the Aug. 18, 2011, sample was 0.69. “That’s a warning flag,” says Don Catlin who founded the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory in 1982 and is one of the founders of modern drug testing in sports. Other experts say the same "But an abnormally low T-E ratio is a red flag" says Conte

        Now that he is a promoter, we have been seeing his fighters get away with lots of stuff too
        Last edited by maracho; 10-11-2017, 02:55 PM.

        Comment

        • koolkc107
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2012
          • 4251
          • 218
          • 3
          • 59,059

          #374
          Nope.

          I will not go over this again.

          This thread is almost 400 posts and all of what you just posted has been presented and soundly refuted several times.

          BTW, I did not and will not watch the video.

          Victo Conte is not a reliable source since he is agenda driven.

          And it begins with Gabriel Montoya, a man with a proven record of publishing false information about Mayweather, also with an agenda.

          Do you have anything new to offer?

          Originally posted by maracho
          A huge portion of AfroAmerican hall of fame boxers have been caught but their legacies remain intact.

          Just because he hasnt been fully caught doesn't mean he's innocent. I say If you cheat on your spouse(s) and/or concubines, youll cheat in the ring


          Take it from the Ped pros

          “USADA’s boxing testing program is propaganda; that’s all,” ..It has one set of rules for some fighters and a different set of rules for others."says Victor Conte.

          The day before his fight against Manny Pacquiao, Floyd Mayweather took two intravenous infusions totaling 750 milliliters. The bags contained mixtures of saline and vitamins, but their contents are irrelevant: any IVs over 50 mL are strictly banned. The Nevada State Athletic Commission, which sanctioned the fight, did not learn of the IV until three weeks after the fight—by which time Mayweather had already sought and received an exemption from his favored drug-testing agency.
          It’s bizarre,” Don Catlin says with regard to the retroactive the****utic use exemption that USADA granted to Mayweather. .. USADA has yet to explain to my satisfaction why Mayweather needed an IV infusion. There might be a valid explanation, but I don’t know what it is.”

          "I don’t get it,” Conte says. “There are strict criteria for the granting of a TUE. You don’t hand them out like Halloween candy. And this sort of IV use is clearly against the rules."

          Mayweather’s testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the April 3, 2013, sample was 0.80. His testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio for the Aug. 18, 2011, sample was 0.69. “That’s a warning flag,” says Don Catlin who founded the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory in 1982 and is one of the founders of modern drug testing in sports. Other experts say the same "But an abnormally low T-E ratio is a red flag" says Conte

          Now that he is a promoter, we have been seeing his fighters get away with lots of stuff too

          Comment

          • travestyny
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 29125
            • 4,962
            • 9,405
            • 4,074,546

            #375
            Originally posted by Shape up
            No embarrassment for me, you have no answers to these questions, even the fed that bought down lance can see a huge issue
            Originally posted by Shape up
            Really, he also said------------- I do know that the facts surrounding Mayweather’s May 1 IV have not been fully explored. And I have a problem with the concept of a doping control officer going to Mayweather’s home, and Mayweather telling the DCO that he’ll provide a full urine sample AFTER he takes an IV infusion of 25.361 ounces of fluid.

            Dude, just stop it. Your second quote is from Thomas Hauser, not "the fed that brought down Lance." This is like the third straight time you've embarrassed yourself. It's over.

            Comment

            • Shape up
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 3123
              • 64
              • 0
              • 35,399

              #376
              Originally posted by travestyny
              Dude, just stop it. Your second quote is from Thomas Hauser, not "the fed that brought down Lance." This is like the third straight time you've embarrassed yourself. It's over.
              No, that was the fed-----------------------------------------------Let’s say, hypothetically, that a hematocrit blood test would show that the percentage of red blood cells to an athlete’s total whole blood volume is 55%. If the athlete adds 750 milliliters (25.361 ounces) of saline solution and vitamins via IV, it won’t diminished the number of red blood cells in that athlete. His red blood cells will still be at an elevated level. But the percentage of red blood cells to that athlete’s total whole blood volume will drop to 47% because he will be increasing his total whole blood volume.

              That’s an example of what is meant by “diluting and masking” through the use of an intravenous infusion.

              floyd mayweather v manny pacquiao

              I don’t know whether or not Floyd Mayweather used prohibited performance enhancing drugs.

              To repeat: I don’t know whether or not Floyd Mayweather used prohibited performance enhancing drugs.

              I do know that the facts surrounding Mayweather’s May 1 IV have not been fully explored. And I have a problem with the concept of a doping control officer going to Mayweather’s home, and Mayweather telling the DCO that he’ll provide a full urine sample AFTER he takes an IV infusion of 25.361 ounces of fluid.
              ---------------------------------------------------------------------it's funny how you make up **** when you have no answers, just like tooli, oh but it won't work for a boxer, he thinks boxers and cyclists are different species

              Comment

              • travestyny
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 29125
                • 4,962
                • 9,405
                • 4,074,546

                #377
                Get ready for yet another schooling, son!!!



                Let's get the easy shlt out of the way first.

                Originally posted by Shape up
                No, that was the fed-----------------------------------------------
                No, fool. Are you ******? That is not a quote from Jeff Novitzky. It is a quote from THOMAS HAUSER! You are too ****** to see where quotation marks begin and end. How can you be this dumb? Honestly, I don't believe you can be this ******. You have to be perpetually high to get this shlt wrong.

                Originally posted by Shape up
                Let’s say, hypothetically, that a hematocrit blood test would show that the percentage of red blood cells to an athlete’s total whole blood volume is 55%. If the athlete adds 750 milliliters (25.361 ounces) of saline solution and vitamins via IV, it won’t diminished the number of red blood cells in that athlete. His red blood cells will still be at an elevated level. But the percentage of red blood cells to that athlete’s total whole blood volume will drop to 47% because he will be increasing his total whole blood volume.

                That’s an example of what is meant by “diluting and masking” through the use of an intravenous infusion.

                WRONG! THOMAS HAUSER HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE **** HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!


                He's so ****ing ****** that he thinks there is a 1:1 ratio of saline solution amount to the amount of blood volume added to a person's body. Jesus Christ, you are both idiots. Thomas Hauser, is that you????

                Look here, you idiot. Let me explain this to you.

                What Hauser is saying is this:

                A person has about 5 liters of blood in their body. This can be verified.

                Scientists estimate the volume of blood in a human body to be approximately 7 percent of body weight. An average adult body with a weight of 150 to 180 pounds will contain approximately 4.7 to 5.5 liters (1.2 to 1.5 gallons) of blood.
                Got that? Ok. so 5 liters, or 5000ml. Now. He's saying that we should start at a red blood cell count of 55%. That would mean that the red blood cell count is 2750, right?

                2750/5000 = 55% hematocrit

                Got that? Ok.

                Now he says that you add 750ml of normal saline, and that reduces your RBC count to 47%.

                2750 RBC / 5750 Blood = 47% hematocrit (actually .478, which can be rounded up to 48%). THIS IS ****ING WRONG!!!


                In actuality, 750ml of normal saline doesn't increase your blood volume by 750ml, you idiot. 1000 ml of normal saline increases your blood volume by about 25%, that would be 250ml!

                Response to 1L of Normal Saline

                The intravascular compartment volume increases by 250ml or so – from 5000ml to 5250ml.
                The physiological effects of infusing one litre of 0.9% sodium chloride solution into a patient are a volume expansion (by around 25% of the original infused volume) and a change in the biochemistry. The plasma osmolality and sodium remain the same, but the chloride may increase by up to 3 mmol/L. Additionally, the change in plasma oncotic pressure drives the excretion of the extra water by the mechanism of glomerulotubular balance.
                Got that????? So 1000ml of Normal Saline increases your blood volume to 5250ml. Since we are talking about 750ml, let's convert it:

                1000ml = 250ml increase, so 750ml = 187.5ml increase!

                Got that????

                So now what we have is the following:
                2750 RBC / 5187.5 Blood = 53% hematocrit



                WHICH MEANS THAT IF A PERSON IS AT 55% HEMATOCRIT AND TAKES 750ML OF NORMAL SALINE, HIS HEMATOCRIT ONLY DROPS TO 53%.

                HAUSER SAYS:


                Anything below 37% or above 51% indicates an irregularity.
                WHICH MEANS THE PERSON STILL FAILS, YOU MORON!!!!!



                R.I.P. THOMAS HAUSER

                THANKS FOR PLAYING.

                Last edited by travestyny; 10-11-2017, 07:12 PM.

                Comment

                • Dosumpthin
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2016
                  • 2340
                  • 149
                  • 77
                  • 25,361

                  #378
                  Originally posted by travestyny
                  Get ready for yet another schooling, son!!!



                  Let's get the easy shlt out of the way first.



                  No, fool. Are you ******? That is not a quote from Jeff Novitzky. It is a quote from THOMAS HAUSER! You are too ****** to see where quotation marks begin and end. How can you be this dumb? Honestly, I don't believe you can be this ******. You have to be perpetually high to get this shlt wrong.




                  WRONG! THOMAS HAUSER HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE **** HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!


                  He's so ****ing ****** that he thinks there is a 1:1 ratio of saline solution amount to the amount of blood volume added to a person's body. Jesus Christ, you are both idiots. Thomas Hauser, is that you????

                  Look here, you idiot. Let me explain this to you.

                  What Hauser is saying is this:

                  A person has about 5 liters of blood in their body. This can be verified.



                  Got that? Ok. so 5 liters, or 5000ml. Now. He's saying that we should start at a red blood cell count of 55%. That would mean that the red blood cell count is 2750, right?

                  2750/5000 = 55% hematocrit

                  Got that? Ok.

                  Now he says that you add 750ml of normal saline, and that reduces your RBC count to 47%.

                  2750 RBC / 5750 Blood = 47% hematocrit (actually .478, which can be rounded up to 48%). THIS IS ****ING WRONG!!!


                  In actuality, 750ml of normal saline doesn't increase your blood volume by 750ml, you idiot. 1000 ml of normal saline increases your blood volume by about 25%, that would be 250ml!



                  Got that????? So 1000ml of Normal Saline increases your blood volume to 5250ml. Since we are talking about 750ml, let's convert it:

                  1000ml = 250ml increase, so 750ml = 187.5ml increase!

                  Got that????

                  So now what we have is the following:
                  2750 RBC / 5187.5 Blood = 53% hematocrit



                  WHICH MEANS THAT IF A PERSON IS AT 55% HEMATOCRIT AND TAKES 750ML OF NORMAL SALINE, HIS HEMATOCRIT ONLY DROPS TO 53%.

                  HAUSER SAYS:




                  WHICH MEANS THE PERSON STILL FAILS, YOU MORON!!!!!



                  R.I.P. THOMAS HAUSER

                  THANKS FOR PLAYING.


                  Dayum dayum DAYUM.

                  ****ing destroyed that idiot

                  Comment

                  • travestyny
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 29125
                    • 4,962
                    • 9,405
                    • 4,074,546

                    #379
                    Originally posted by Dosumpthin
                    Dayum dayum DAYUM.

                    ****ing destroyed that idiot
                    It doesn't really matter. He's clearly too dumb to understand any part of my post.

                    Comment

                    • Shape up
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2016
                      • 3123
                      • 64
                      • 0
                      • 35,399

                      #380
                      Originally posted by koolkc107
                      Nope.

                      I will not go over this again.

                      This thread is almost 400 posts and all of what you just posted has been presented and soundly refuted several times.

                      BTW, I did not and will not watch the video.

                      Victo Conte is not a reliable source since he is agenda driven.

                      And it begins with Gabriel Montoya, a man with a proven record of publishing false information about Mayweather, also with an agenda.

                      Do you have anything new to offer?
                      Who would know better how to beat the system

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP