Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[ADP02]

You still deflecting?????

Unbelievable!!!!!


One more time: DID MANNY PACQUIAO LIE ABOUT HIS SHOULDER?


WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER, ADP02?

Man you are loonie!!!!


I already explained it before and explained it now.

Is your question, "Was Manny injured?" YES

Was he injured coming into the fight? DEFINITELY!!! All it took to aggravate it further is throwing his right and it eventually tore completely.


Did he possibly lie after to cover up the issue with the pre-fight medical form (checkbox) so that the NSAC cannot go after him and possibly others who were going to sue him. If the statements that you posted are correct then it is a possibility, yes.


What is the point of these types of questioning? NOTHING!!!

Travestyny even DEFLECTs on the simplest of questions. What is your freaking point!!!


.

[Shape up]

Or De La Hoya.

He had an IV after the weigh-in. Yet we never heard anything about Nevada saying that he was dehydrated.

He so obviously was. Miraculously, he passed the physical.

Why has WADA done this?
The manipulation WADA is targeting here is the use
of an IV infusion to
change blood test results (such as hematocrit where
EPO is being used),
urine tests results (by dilution), use in ‘weight s
ports’ where an infusion will
restore deliberately depleted hydration levels afte
r the ‘weight-in’ and as part
of blood doping.
How should doctors manage the circumstances where t
hey believe an
athlete requires intravenous fluids?
The WADA Code is clear; a retrospective TUE applica
tion should be made to
the appropriate TUE committee. The basis of the app
lication and the
deliberation of the TUEC will be on the interpretat
ion of whether there was an
acute medical situation and whether the infusion wa
s the reasonable
treatment. Therefore the information a doctor will
need to provide to the TUEC
must include the clinical circumstances that demons
trates urgency and the
appropriateness of an infusion.
Unfortunately WADA has deliberately not defined the
se circumstances.
What are examples where it would be reasonable to u
se an IV infusion?
WADA has not as yet given specific guidance.
ASDMAC has discussed the clinical circumstances whe
re the committee
would be comfortable approving a retrospective TUE.
These would include
the treatment of any acute medical condition where
an IV line was essential,
where there are significant acute changes to the vi
tal signs or where there has
been confirmation of the need for an IV by another
independent doctor.
Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete wit
h signs of circulatory
compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgic
al procedure, an IV line in
the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc
.
What are examples where it would not be reasonable
to use an infusion?
Circumstances where the condition was other than ac
ute and/or there was an
absence of significant change to the vital signs of
the individual.
Examples include the treatment of dehydration witho
ut significant signs of
circulatory stress (weight loss is not considered a
vital sign alone) or the use
of an IV infusion as a ‘recovery’ tool. It is worth
noting that the evidence is that
oral rehydration is superior to IV rehydration unle
ss there are circulatory signs
of collapse.
It goes without saying that any use of an IV infusi
on immediately prior to a
drug test (whether blood or urine) would be conside
red highly su****ious and
should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
It is worth remembering that an inappropriate use o
f an IV infusion could
generate a doping violation charge against the doct
or-------------- here is a very good article, did floyd meet the criteria NOOOOOOO

[travestyny]

Man you are loonie!!!!


I already explained it before and explained it now.

Is your question, "Was Manny injured?" YES

Was he injured coming into the fight? DEFINITELY!!! All it took to aggravate it further is throwing his right and it eventually tore completely.


Did he possibly lie after to cover up the issue with the pre-fight medical form (checkbox) so that the NSAC cannot go after him and possibly others who were going to sue him. If the statements that you posted are correct then it is a possibility, yes.


What is the point of these types of questioning? NOTHING!!!

Travestyny even DEFLECTs on the simplest of questions. What is your freaking point!!!


.

I'm not asking what was a possibility, deflector.


I'm asking you did he lie? Yes or no?


He said straight from his mouth:

I HAD NO INJURY
I WAS 100% GOING INTO THE FIGHT

His doctor said:
HE WAS AT FULL STRENGTH GOING INTO THE FIGHT.

Arum said:
HE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO PAIN GOING INTO THE FIGHT.

Koncz said:
HE HAD NO PAIN GOING INTO THE FIGHT.


ARE YOU TELLING ME THESE ARE ALL LIES? YES OR NO?

It's hysterical witnessing you squirm! Keep DEFLECTING!!!

[Shape up]

We've been through this man times. That's not what the rules say:





It has been stated by USADA that the DCO witnessed Floyd's physical condition that made the IV necessary. Until anyone finds out what that was, that only leaves speculation.

For some of you, it is soooo important if he took this IV. Most of us with a brain don't give a shlt UNLESS it can be proven that he took PED'S.

BUT WHEN I ASK YOU GUYS TO EXPLAIN HOW HE DILUTED HIS URINE SAMPLE WITH AN IV AND FOOLED THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST DONE BY THE DCO AND THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT WADA LAB.....

NOTHING.

You keep forgetting that the above only comes into play if it was an emergency, sitting in your lounge room with an IV in your arm for mild dehydration doesn't cut it, answer this question, WHY WASNT HE TAKEN TO HOSPITAL, where he could have been accessed properly

[travestyny]

Why has WADA done this?
The manipulation WADA is targeting here is the use
of an IV infusion to
change blood test results (such as hematocrit where
EPO is being used),
urine tests results (by dilution), use in ‘weight s
ports’ where an infusion will
restore deliberately depleted hydration levels afte
r the ‘weight-in’ and as part
of blood doping.
How should doctors manage the circumstances where t
hey believe an
athlete requires intravenous fluids?
The WADA Code is clear; a retrospective TUE applica
tion should be made to
the appropriate TUE committee. The basis of the app
lication and the
deliberation of the TUEC will be on the interpretat
ion of whether there was an
acute medical situation and whether the infusion wa
s the reasonable
treatment. Therefore the information a doctor will
need to provide to the TUEC
must include the clinical circumstances that demons
trates urgency and the
appropriateness of an infusion.
Unfortunately WADA has deliberately not defined the
se circumstances.
What are examples where it would be reasonable to u
se an IV infusion?
WADA has not as yet given specific guidance.
ASDMAC has discussed the clinical circumstances whe
re the committee
would be comfortable approving a retrospective TUE.
These would include
the treatment of any acute medical condition where
an IV line was essential,
where there are significant acute changes to the vi
tal signs or where there has
been confirmation of the need for an IV by another
independent doctor.
Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete wit
h signs of circulatory
compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgic
al procedure, an IV line in
the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc
.
What are examples where it would not be reasonable
to use an infusion?
Circumstances where the condition was other than ac
ute and/or there was an
absence of significant change to the vital signs of
the individual.
Examples include the treatment of dehydration witho
ut significant signs of
circulatory stress (weight loss is not considered a
vital sign alone) or the use
of an IV infusion as a ‘recovery’ tool. It is worth
noting that the evidence is that
oral rehydration is superior to IV rehydration unle
ss there are circulatory signs
of collapse.
It goes without saying that any use of an IV infusi
on immediately prior to a
drug test (whether blood or urine) would be conside
red highly su****ious and
should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
It is worth remembering that an inappropriate use o
f an IV infusion could
generate a doping violation charge against the doct
or-------------- here is a very good article, did floyd meet the criteria NOOOOOOO

Did you read what you just posted? Even the article states that WADA hasn't clearly defined what would be necessary.


On the other hand,what do we know?

1. The DCO was present at the time of the IV and witnessed Mayweather's physical condition that caused the need for the IV.

2. The TUEC approved the application without Mayweather's name on the application. Why would they do that???

3. Urine samples were taken from BEFORE the IV and AFTER the IV. Nothing illegal in his system BEFORE...nothing illegal in his system AFTER.


This isn't hard to understand.

[travestyny]

You keep forgetting that the above only comes into play if it was an emergency, sitting in your lounge room with an IV in your arm for mild dehydration doesn't cut it, answer this question, WHY WASNT HE TAKEN TO HOSPITAL, where he could have been accessed properly

You don't have to be taken to a hospital to be assessed (I think that's what you mean) properly.

If you had to be, then the rules wouldn't allow for an IV to be given on a playing field, now would it?

If a paramedic comes to your home, I'm pretty sure he/she can assess the situation right there. And you still won't accept that the rules do NOT state that it has to be in a hospital. The section you were reading was a recommendation about how to properly treat an athlete patient. Of course you want to treat a patient someplace that is clean and safe. You're confusing this with necessity for their rules. That is not the case.


And you're still ducking the point. How does he dilute his urine sample with an IV if a sample is given from before and after the IV, and both are checked by the DCO and the WADA lab for dilution?

[ADP02]

HAVE FLOYD CHANGE THE CONTRACT?????? Dude. You've been going on and on about this, and you still have no idea what the **** you are talking about????

Floyd wasn't responsible for any lack of transparency, you buffoon. Neither is USADA. It was WADA's rules that they wanted to tweak. Once Pacquiao asked for that, USADA went back to Floyd and told him what Pacquiao wanted, and Mayweather agreed that it was no problem.


Now EXPLAIN HOW HE DILUTED HIS URINE TO MASK PED'S....THAT WAS SPECIFICALLY CHECKED FOR DILUTION BY THE DCO AND THE INDEPENDENT WADA LAB.


Go!

Sorry but that is YOU!!!

Critics have pointed out USADA's lack of transparency or am I making this up?


If you didn't know and I asked you these scenarios that factually occurred. would you say to me that it was impossible????:

1) Lance Armstrong was on PEDs. The DCO was there. Lance Armstrong's doc smuggled the IV and gave the IV to Armstrong. It may have taken 15-20 minutes ....


- You would have said that is impossible for a number of reasons including that the DCO is always supposed to be able to see you.
- That the doctor would have to be in on it.
- That the DCO would have to be in on it.




2) Lance Armstrong used PEDs and provided a RETRO prescription that was back dated.
You would have said that is impossible because:
- That the doctor would have to be in on it.
- That the DCO would have to be in on it.
- That the UCI would have to be in on it.
- That the UCI has caught other athletes so what made Lance so special?



Athletes have cheated without the luxury of having USADA on their side, as is the case with Floyd. Yet you act like Floyd's scenario was cheat proof???????

WOW!!!



USADA/WADA admits that the athlete is often 1 or 2 steps ahead of the tester. So the situation or gift that was provided to Floyd was a big thank you for the money that Floyd's reps gave to USADA.

Remember that Floyd DELAYED 6+ hours and was provided with 2 BANNED IVs!





USADA's Travis Tygart

Q: If I had 72 hours, could I mask EPO?

A: "Yeah."

Q: If I knew it was coming, I could mask it?

A: "Yeah. Same with steroids."

Q: How quickly could I mask it? What's the shortest time frame, if I knew it was coming, that I could mask it?

A: "I mean, we do not notice. We literally show up, and knock on a door, and we find them."

Q: My question is, if I knew 20 hours before the test, would I have time to mask it? Six hours? One hour? What would it be?

A: "Yep, all that."

Q: If I knew 10 minutes before test, could I mask it?

A: "Yep...........

[travestyny]

Sorry but that is YOU!!!

Critics have pointed out USADA's lack of transparency or am I making this up?


If you didn't know and I asked you these scenarios that factually occurred. would you say to me that it was impossible????:

1) Lance Armstrong was on PEDs. The DCO was there. Lance Armstrong's doc smuggled the IV and gave the IV to Armstrong. It may have taken 15-20 minutes ....


- You would have said that is impossible for a number of reasons including that the DCO is always supposed to be able to see you.
- That the doctor would have to be in on it.
- That the DCO would have to be in on it.




2) Lance Armstrong used PEDs and provided a RETRO prescription that was back dated.
You would have said that is impossible because:
- That the doctor would have to be in on it.
- That the DCO would have to be in on it.
- That the UCI would have to be in on it.
- That the UCI has caught other athletes so what made Lance so special?



Athletes have cheated without the luxury of having USADA on their side, as is the case with Floyd. Yet you act like Floyd's scenario was cheat proof???????

WOW!!!



USADA/WADA admits that the athlete is often 1 or 2 steps ahead of the tester. So the situation or gift that was provided to Floyd was a big thank you for the money that Floyd's reps gave to USADA.

Remember that Floyd DELAYED 6+ hours and was provided with 2 BANNED IVs!





USADA's Travis Tygart

Q: If I had 72 hours, could I mask EPO?

A: "Yeah."

Q: If I knew it was coming, I could mask it?

A: "Yeah. Same with steroids."

Q: How quickly could I mask it? What's the shortest time frame, if I knew it was coming, that I could mask it?

A: "I mean, we do not notice. We literally show up, and knock on a door, and we find them."

Q: My question is, if I knew 20 hours before the test, would I have time to mask it? Six hours? One hour? What would it be?

A: "Yep, all that."

Q: If I knew 10 minutes before test, could I mask it?

A: "Yep...........

Oh my god. LANCE AMRSTRONG AGAIN????? REALLYYYYY????? DEFLECTION!!!!!!!


HOW DID HE DELAY 6 HOURS WHEN HE GAVE A PARTIAL SAMPLE FROM BEFORE THE IV.

EXPLAIN ADP02


YOU'RE TRYING TO ARGUE THAT MAYWEATHER CAN CHEAT A TEST IF HE KNEW ABOUT IT 10 MINUTES BEFORE.........AND HE PAID OFF USADA AND NEEDED A TUE????

YOU'RE A DUMMY!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

USADA's Travis Tygart

Q: If I had 72 hours, could I mask EPO?

A: "Yeah."

Q: If I knew it was coming, I could mask it?

A: "Yeah. Same with steroids."

Q: How quickly could I mask it? What's the shortest time frame, if I knew it was coming, that I could mask it?

A: "I mean, we do not notice. We literally show up, and knock on a door, and we find them."

Q: My question is, if I knew 20 hours before the test, would I have time to mask it? Six hours? One hour? What would it be?

A: "Yep, all that."

Q: If I knew 10 minutes before test, could I mask it?

A: "Yep...........

BY THE WAY, THANKS FOR THIS INTERVIEW. I'M READING IT NOW. SOME GOOD STUFF HERE. SO FAR, RIGHT AT THE TOP, I SEE THIS:

Q: Have you ever spoken with anyone from the Mayweather side about this topic?

A: "Through the Mayweather-Pacquiao discussion, we talked with both camps on a number of occasions about the basics of an effective anti-doping program."

Q: How did the feedback you got from them differ, because, obviously, they had different perspectives on it?

A: "Out of respect for that process I don't want to go into a ton of detail. But it's safe to say that the Mayweather camp wanted the carte blanche, gold-standard program that we run, and the other side didn't want to do that."

LMAOOOOOOO. DUDEEEEE. YOU'RE JUST STEPPING IN SHlT!!!

[ADP02]

Man you are loonie!!!!


I already explained it before and explained it now.

Is your question, "Was Manny injured?" YES

Was he injured coming into the fight? DEFINITELY!!! All it took to aggravate it further is throwing his right and it eventually tore completely.


Did he possibly lie after to cover up the issue with the pre-fight medical form (checkbox) so that the NSAC cannot go after him and possibly others who were going to sue him. If the statements that you posted are correct then it is a possibility, yes.


What is the point of these types of questioning? NOTHING!!!

Travestyny even DEFLECTs on the simplest of questions. What is your freaking point!!!


.

I'm not asking what was a possibility, deflector.


I'm asking you did he lie? Yes or no?


He said straight from his mouth:

I HAD NO INJURY
I WAS 100% GOING INTO THE FIGHT

His doctor said:
HE WAS AT FULL STRENGTH GOING INTO THE FIGHT.

Arum said:
HE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO PAIN GOING INTO THE FIGHT.

Koncz said:
HE HAD NO PAIN GOING INTO THE FIGHT.


ARE YOU TELLING ME THESE ARE ALL LIES? YES OR NO?

It's hysterical witnessing you squirm! Keep DEFLECTING!!!

Hmmm, are you not saying the opposite and that those statements were not lies? So of course my answer is correct in saying given what I think is the reason why, possibly they were lying to cover up that unchecked check mark. IF I'm wrong then what?


But as I expected, you DEFLECTED AGAIN!!!


What's the point of this useless questioning? Manny was not even allowed to use the meds!!!!


Floyd hid the info from the NSAC (pre-fight form) and used the IVs without informing the NSAC until well after the fight. It's great to have USADA on your side .... well, Floyd also has the NSAC.

Floyd doesn't even need to write his medical conditions on that form ONLY Manny!!!

.