He aint cheatin, theys all just concubines
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail
Collapse
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostNo. You are having a lot of difficulty comprehending this.
It says that as per WADA'S RULES, a retro TUE CAN be issued.
If it was the case that it can't be, then whose rules are to be followed? This isn't rocket science.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostWrong again.
You still haven't learned what the word retroactive means.
retroactive |ˌretrōˈaktiv|
adjective
(especially of legislation) taking effect from a date in the past
Again, not rocket science. The spokesperson already confirmed this, according to WADA'S RULES.
WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE CAN be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that WOULD BE monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative.
You keep linking to this, so how can you not understand that according to WADA'S RULES, it is allowed. It makes no sense for you to say that because WADA wasn't monitoring it, then it is not allowed.
So USADA isn't allowed to give a retro TUE when WADA isn't monitoring? Is that your stance now. Ok. Then USADA should let athletes die, huh?You make no sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostSee your clutching at straws, it can be issued IF IT IS MONITORED BY WADA, WADA stated that in this circumstance that THEY WERE NOT MONITERING, that means that usada broke WADA rules
IF USADA BROKE WADA’S RULES AS YOU SAY, WHY WAS USADA NOT SANCTIONED BY WADA???
Let’s hear thisOr will you duck out like you did about the specific gravity?
You aren’t too bright, are you? Please answer the question
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View Postso fluid Jnr was going to die from mild dehydration, your funny, I didn't know you were a comedian, it's not my stance, it's WADAs
Comment
-
-
travestyny slapping about the ******ed Pac turds once again. They think if they keep repeating their bull**** they can influence peoples opinions with their lies. Problem is Pac turds you don't have the numbers anymore, most of of you bailed when Pacquiao got schooled and made embarrassing excuses. There's only a handful of you left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostI stopped reading right here. Now pay attention.
IF USADA BROKE WADA’S RULES AS YOU SAY, WHY WAS USADA NOT SANCTIONED BY WADA???
Let’s hear thisOr will you duck out like you did about the specific gravity?
You aren’t too bright, are you? Please answer the question
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostIV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.----------- there is not but here either, you need a TUE in ADVANCE for an IV at your house, very easy to comprehend
In advance?
Dear WADA TUEC,
As per my doctor/psychic/lawyer, I will need a TUE for an IV to combat dehydration due to uncontrollable runny shlts exactly 26 days from the time you have received and read this application.
Thanks in advance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostWhy would they go down that track when it wasn't for a signatory, exactly the reason that this wasn't monitored, you will also find in the contract for the fight a disclaimer that over rides all decisions apart from the NSAC rules, so in other words all of this drug testing by usada was a sham, they're shady, morales case was aswell, usada said they RANG the NSAC to let them know the results, are they that inept not to confirm information so important via an email of fax, I don't think so, they never told the NSAC of the results
USADA isnt a WADA signatory?
You're a clown.
Comment
Comment