Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He aint cheatin, theys all just concubines

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      No. You are having a lot of difficulty comprehending this.


      It says that as per WADA'S RULES, a retro TUE CAN be issued.


      If it was the case that it can't be, then whose rules are to be followed? This isn't rocket science.
      See your clutching at straws, it can be issued IF IT IS MONITORED BY WADA, WADA stated that in this circumstance that THEY WERE NOT MONITERING, that means that usada broke WADA rules to issue a retro TUE, you must be the only 16 year old still in grade 1, you can't take in more than 6 words in one article, I can see by your post that you can't find a single piece of evidence backing your arguement, the only explaination is that usada owed fluid IVayweather Jnr a favor for getting them into boxing but it all went horribly wrong, it went public and this will always be a very dark cloud over fluids career

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Wrong again.

        You still haven't learned what the word retroactive means.

        retroactive |ˌretrōˈaktiv|
        adjective
        (especially of legislation) taking effect from a date in the past



        Again, not rocket science. The spokesperson already confirmed this, according to WADA'S RULES.

        WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE CAN be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that WOULD BE monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative.


        You keep linking to this, so how can you not understand that according to WADA'S RULES, it is allowed. It makes no sense for you to say that because WADA wasn't monitoring it, then it is not allowed.

        So USADA isn't allowed to give a retro TUE when WADA isn't monitoring? Is that your stance now. Ok. Then USADA should let athletes die, huh? You make no sense.
        so fluid Jnr was going to die from mild dehydration, your funny, I didn't know you were a comedian, it's not my stance, it's WADAs

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          See your clutching at straws, it can be issued IF IT IS MONITORED BY WADA, WADA stated that in this circumstance that THEY WERE NOT MONITERING, that means that usada broke WADA rules
          I stopped reading right here. Now pay attention.

          IF USADA BROKE WADA’S RULES AS YOU SAY, WHY WAS USADA NOT SANCTIONED BY WADA???

          Let’s hear this Or will you duck out like you did about the specific gravity?

          You aren’t too bright, are you? Please answer the question

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
            so fluid Jnr was going to die from mild dehydration, your funny, I didn't know you were a comedian, it's not my stance, it's WADAs
            No one is saying he was going to die you imbecile. The point is it did not have to be a life threatening emergency. I don’t expect you to understand that because you can barely read

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
              you can't find a single piece of evidence backing your arguement,
              IF USADA BROKE WADA’S RULES AS YOU SAY, WHY WAS USADA NOT SANCTIONED BY WADA???

              Here is my evidence. Waitinggggg

              Comment


              • travestyny slapping about the ******ed Pac turds once again. They think if they keep repeating their bull**** they can influence peoples opinions with their lies. Problem is Pac turds you don't have the numbers anymore, most of of you bailed when Pacquiao got schooled and made embarrassing excuses. There's only a handful of you left.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  I stopped reading right here. Now pay attention.

                  IF USADA BROKE WADA’S RULES AS YOU SAY, WHY WAS USADA NOT SANCTIONED BY WADA???

                  Let’s hear this Or will you duck out like you did about the specific gravity?

                  You aren’t too bright, are you? Please answer the question
                  Why would they go down that track when it wasn't for a signatory, exactly the reason that this wasn't monitored, you will also find in the contract for the fight a disclaimer that over rides all decisions apart from the NSAC rules, so in other words all of this drug testing by usada was a sham, they're shady, morales case was aswell, usada said they RANG the NSAC to let them know the results, are they that inept not to confirm information so important via an email of fax, I don't think so, they never told the NSAC of the results

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                    IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.----------- there is not but here either, you need a TUE in ADVANCE for an IV at your house, very easy to comprehend

                    In advance?

                    Dear WADA TUEC,

                    As per my doctor/psychic/lawyer, I will need a TUE for an IV to combat dehydration due to uncontrollable runny shlts exactly 26 days from the time you have received and read this application.


                    Thanks in advance.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                      Why would they go down that track when it wasn't for a signatory, exactly the reason that this wasn't monitored, you will also find in the contract for the fight a disclaimer that over rides all decisions apart from the NSAC rules, so in other words all of this drug testing by usada was a sham, they're shady, morales case was aswell, usada said they RANG the NSAC to let them know the results, are they that inept not to confirm information so important via an email of fax, I don't think so, they never told the NSAC of the results

                      USADA isnt a WADA signatory?

                      You're a clown.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP