Come on, like Braehmer got any signature wins, and sometimes who you fight matters more than belts. At least Perez faced guys like Povetkin and Abdusalamov.
Also, a KO loss in round 1 against Povetkin doesn't count for ****. It was round 1... we had no idea what he could do against such a massive step up and he got demolished. Doesn't prove anything... do you know how resumes work? Peter Quillen got 0 credit for "having" Danny Jacobs on his record because it was a 1 round blow out...
Paulie Malignaggi went 10+ rounds with Cotto, Hatton, and Khan.. that counts as having names on your resume even if he lost. Don't give me Povetkin..
Braehmer was fighting no hopers to the point that boxing fans stopped caring about the belt he was holding hostage
How it can be double standarts when we know that Lebedev and Huck (just like Huck and Briedis, Gassiev and Lebedev) fought against each other? And Braehmer never faced a guy his own caliber during his "reign"? The first decent guy (not good, but decent) that he faced took his belt. It's not about the fact he was fighting in his hometown, it's about the fact he was being protected there. Lebedev and Huck, Gassiev and Lebedev, Huck and Briedis were willing to face each other
This is how I know you're a boxrec boxing historian.. Braehmer was beating Cleverly and was probably going get a stoppage or wide decision until he broke his arm.. look it up.. Braehmer's impressive showing (tho it was a freak loss) against Cleverly is much more significant than getting blown away by Povetkin before the match even started..
You know that historically, cruiserweight division isn't getting much exposure in America, but for some reason you think being on American TV = being tested at the world level. Tell you what, Mike Perez beats Braehmer in that department then
In other words, you need American media sources giving more exposure to CW division for you to start considering it good or deep. Got you
In other words, you need American media sources giving more exposure to CW division for you to start considering it good or deep. Got you
Talent needs to be proved, even against guys like Lebedev or Huck, not against Max Bursack
Or UK....
Like I've said, how they were feasting on bums, if at least all these guys faced each other? Braehmer wasn't even doing that minimum.
Or you need them to get on HBO for you to admit they're better than Porky Medina and Bursack
Or UK....
Like I've said, how they were feasting on bums, if at least all these guys faced each other? Braehmer wasn't even doing that minimum.
Or you need them to get on HBO for you to admit they're better than Porky Medina and Bursack
Great resume-builder sounds like Abraham, who never been as good at SMW as Lebedev and Huck at CW
Potential HOF'ers can't get outboxed by the guys of BJS caliber
Oh, so who were these ATG's who gave 5 L's to Bursack and 8 L's to Medina? See, you mention Bursack and Medina (with "multiple losses" - your words, not mine) as notable wins and I mention Lebedev and Huck who were champs for a long time, it's obvious which set of standarts is higher there. If Bursack or Medina are worth mentioning from you, then the same goes to Charr, Kalenga, even Mchunu
You know you losing when you attack a 20 yo Benavidez's resume... I specificed that I gave you 4 fighters at 168 that are of Dorticos, Gassiev, Breidis, Usyk caliber and I gave you 2 more in Callum Smith and Benavidez to prove 168 has more up and coming talent (young!!!) than CW (38 yo Lebedev, 31 yo Glowacki, 36 yo Wlod).
I only brought up Smith and Benavidez to show there are young, high ceiling dudes coming up at 168. What do you have to say about Ramirez, Eubank, Degale, Groves? Forget Bursack.. Ramirez still has Abraham... hmm? Got nothing to say about those guys? Gotta go after Bursack and Medina LOL
Now find threads about WBSS 168 fights and CW fights and compare what type of threads getting WAY more responses from posters here, so you'll know the answer which division is deep and which one isn't all that. Don't believe me, just see for yourself
Getting exposure from HBO or other US media sources doesn't mean anything in this case, because like I've said before, american audience never been interested in CW historically. That's not the way how you can measure the talent pool of the division.
Comment