Comments Thread For: Bernard Hopkins: Canelo Will Beat Golovkin EASY in Rematch!

[Progrssive_Jedi]

He Said belongs would win Easy First time and they had to buy judges

At 35 GGG beat a prime Canelo. Hopkins is talking like he knows they gave the judges paid already.

Byrd was a distraction. She did that score to sheiks from the criticism Canelo was given free rounds. Round 7 was GGG best round, yet Canelo got it. They knew critism would fall there so they put up an absurd score totake all the blame.

Truth is, I can see ggg making a few adjustments and finishing Canelo.

I can't see Canelo suddenly being able to fight for 3 minute each round.

Most of boxing believes Canelo gets favorable cards, mist thought ggg won.

The fight should have been 8-4, and that mean Canelo has to improve by 3 legit rounds. GGG only has to keep from regressing 3.

And if GGG can cut Canelo right slip escape path, then Canelo is in trouble. Canelo fans keep saying it's gonna be easier, but that's bologna, he wasn't that great the first time.

GGG at 28 and Canelo at 35 is a bloodbath.

[BigStomps]

One guy did win 7 rounds clearly.

That's why so many people are still pissed off about it being ruled a draw 3 weeks later.

Well that's your opinion and your definitely entitled to it.
I didn't see either win 7 rounds clearly. I can make a case for either fighter winning, it just depends on what you like to see in a Fight. You either score fights by being the aggressor and walking your opponent down the way Triple g did even tho he was missing alot of the punches he was throwing or you score fights by watching a fighter use footwork and evade your opponents punches and countering with hard, clean punches to the face and body the way Canelo was.
Like I said, I can make a case for either fighter winning.
So I didn't see a clear victory in this fight.

[BigStomps]

That's true but I wasn't saying one of them did. I was just making a point that 7 - 5 can be a clear win.

Now your ****ing contradicting yourself! Now neither fighter won 7 rounds clearly?? Exactly my point!
That's the whole ****ing reason people are still debating on the outcome of the fight!

[skinnystev]

the running yellow dog lost the 1st fight and he will lose the rematch

[kafkod]

Well that's your opinion and your definitely entitled to it.
I didn't see any either win 7 rounds clearly. I can make a case for either fighter winning, it just depends on what you like to see in a Fight. You either score fights by being the aggressor and walking your opponent down the way Triple g did even tho he was missing alot of the punches he was throwing or you score fights by watching a fighter use footwork and evade your opponents punches and countering with hard, clean punches to the face and body the way Canelo was.
Like I said, I can make a case for either fighter winning.
So I didn't see a clear victory in this fight.

I didn't personally think that either of them won 7 rounds clearly, tbh, but I did score it to GGG by 2 clear rounds - 6 - 4 with 2 rounds too close to call either way.

[kafkod]

Now your ****ing contradicting yourself! Now neither fighter won 7 rounds clearly?? Exactly my point!
That's the whole ****ing reason people are still debating on the outcome of the fight!

Lol - I just replied to you quoting me. Read what I said there.

[BigStomps]

Lol - I just replied to you quoting me. Read what I said there.

Okay fair enough. Well hopefully we get a rematch next May and we don't get a bullshet scorecard if it goes to decision like that dumb b itch gave Canelo.

[BigStomps]

you said 7-5 and I said I had it around the same. Day of the fight I had it 8-4 which was 1 round different from you. Watching it, I could see Canelo potentially winning 5 but I guess you have a different perception of clear victory. Canelo beat Chavez convincingly to me, meaning not even close. Thurman beat Danny garcia to me clearly, but competitively. I think there can be a clear winner in a competitive fight when the rounds that 1 guy wins (whether it be 7 or 8) are convincing. Not sure if it makes sense the way I'm writing it but, the rounds canelo won I think he did so because he won them in spurts with flurries and movement. He never seemed to have complete control in any round The rounds that ggg won to me were convincing because he controlled the majority of the 3 minutes in those rounds and was landing a stiff jab while keeping Canelo on his back foot and somewhat inactive. I think that happened at least in 7 of those roundssnd don't see how those rounds could've gone the other way. Either way, let's see the rematch next and hopefully we get a convincing pac vs Marquez kind of ending.

Yeah hopefully. Contrary to what people and Abel Sanchez say I do think Canelo has the power to hurt Triple g and stop him or knock him out. We saw Triple g be wary of Canelo's power so that's a possibility. But Triple g can also hurt Canelo with that one punch.
I just hope they don't ruin a great fight if it goes to decision again like that dumb b itch gave Canelo that scorecard.

[JAMESON]

Canello will win easier next time around but still will be a top fight. He is a young,experienced progressive fighter with a huge upside. GGG however is only now in his past two fights starting to fight decent fighters.(please note I respect anyone who steps into the ring)and is 35. He needs to cash in on his built up protected record(no ko's in his last two fights and arguably should have lost both against quality fighters).should have gone up or down in weight a few years ago instead of playing it safe in a division that has lacked depth for a while now.
Canello won first 3 rounds and last 3 rounds with 1 or 2 rounds possibly even in the middle so a draw over all not such a bad thing for GGG.
Close subjective fight so no robbery either way. JUST DO IT AGAIN IN MAY!

[Robi13]

Canelo won this fight. Ggg did nothing. Canelo had the better punches land and made ggg miss alot and look slow. Video don't lie.