Comments Thread For: Bernard Hopkins: Canelo Will Beat Golovkin EASY in Rematch!

[rrayvez]

bro, I'm not even gonna watch this. There is one that shows how pac really beat Floyd and how Hopkins cheated to beat Trinidad. I know boxing and know what I saw and nobody was taken to school.

[BigStomps]

I thought ggg won clearly. I said it was competitive but having watched the fight 3 times, I couldn't find more than 5 rounds I would've scored for canelo. For example, I thought cotto gave Canelo a close competitive fight but thought Canelo won clearly. (much closer that the judges had it, but a clear win) My main point is I don't see Canelo beating ggg easily as Hopkins says and anyone who thinks so is being overly hopeful.

You told me the day after the fight you scored it 7-5 Triple g so how the **** is that a clear victory?? A clear victory is the ass whooping Canelo gave Chavez. When you sweep all 12 rounds then that's a clear victory!
When a fighter wins 7 out of 12 rounds then that's not a clear victory! You have one more round going the other way to the guy that won 5 rounds and you got a ****ing draw so how the **** is that a clear victory??? C'mon man, be rational!
I know you know boxing so put the hate to the side and admit it was a close ****ing fight! NEITHER FIGHTER WON CLEARLY!
Most people prefer an aggressive fighter and that's fine and If you feel Triple g won for that reason then fine but just keep it real! It was a great, close fight but neither fighter won clearly!

[Robi13]

Fine .. so stop stalling and get the rematch on. No need to wait till May next year. This fight doesn't need to happen on a Mexican holiday to make money.

The Mexican is a side . So it'll happen when the Mexican says it happens...

[TonyGe]

Hopkins said the same thing prior to the first fight. He has to. He's the Promotor..

[kafkod]

You told me the day after the fight you scored it 7-5 Triple g so how the **** is that a clear victory?? A clear victory is the ass whooping Canelo gave Chavez. When you sweep all 12 rounds then that's a clear victory!
When a fighter wins 7 out of 12 rounds then that's not a clear victory! You have one more round going the other way to the guy that won 5 rounds and you got a ****ing draw so how the **** is that a clear victory??? C'mon man, be rational!
I know you know boxing so put the hate to the side and admit it was a close ****ing fight! NEITHER FIGHTER WON CLEARLY!
Most people prefer an aggressive fighter and that's fine and If you feel Triple g won for that reason then fine but just keep it real! It was a great, close fight but neither fighter won clearly!

If one guy wins 7 rounds clearly and the other guy wins 5 rounds clearly ... that's 7 - 5 and a clear win.

Wouldn't you agree?

[rrayvez]

You told me the day after the fight you scored it 7-5 Triple g so how the **** is that a clear victory?? A clear victory is the ass whooping Canelo gave Chavez. When you sweep all 12 rounds then that's a clear victory!
When a fighter wins 7 out of 12 rounds then that's not a clear victory! You have one more round going the other way to the guy that won 5 rounds and you got a ****ing draw so how the **** is that a clear victory??? C'mon man, be rational!
I know you know boxing so put the hate to the side and admit it was a close ****ing fight! NEITHER FIGHTER WON CLEARLY!
Most people prefer an aggressive fighter and that's fine and If you feel Triple g won for that reason then fine but just keep it real! It was a great, close fight but neither fighter won clearly!

you said 7-5 and I said I had it around the same. Day of the fight I had it 8-4 which was 1 round different from you. Watching it, I could see Canelo potentially winning 5 but I guess you have a different perception of clear victory. Canelo beat Chavez convincingly to me, meaning not even close. Thurman beat Danny garcia to me clearly, but competitively. I think there can be a clear winner in a competitive fight when the rounds that 1 guy wins (whether it be 7 or 8) are convincing. Not sure if it makes sense the way I'm writing it but, the rounds canelo won I think he did so because he won them in spurts with flurries and movement. He never seemed to have complete control in any round The rounds that ggg won to me were convincing because he controlled the majority of the 3 minutes in those rounds and was landing a stiff jab while keeping Canelo on his back foot and somewhat inactive. I think that happened at least in 7 of those roundssnd don't see how those rounds could've gone the other way. Either way, let's see the rematch next and hopefully we get a convincing pac vs Marquez kind of ending.

[kafkod]

You told me the day after the fight you scored it 7-5 Triple g so how the **** is that a clear victory?? A clear victory is the ass whooping Canelo gave Chavez. When you sweep all 12 rounds then that's a clear victory!
When a fighter wins 7 out of 12 rounds then that's not a clear victory! You have one more round going the other way to the guy that won 5 rounds and you got a ****ing draw so how the **** is that a clear victory??? C'mon man, be rational!
I know you know boxing so put the hate to the side and admit it was a close ****ing fight! NEITHER FIGHTER WON CLEARLY!
Most people prefer an aggressive fighter and that's fine and If you feel Triple g won for that reason then fine but just keep it real! It was a great, close fight but neither fighter won clearly!

If a whore had 2 wheels she'd be a bicycle!

[Hot Shyt]

he lost the first fight but if he gets his stamina up (which seems to be a big if), I too think he will win the 2nd fight easily

[BigStomps]

If one guy wins 7 rounds clearly and the other guy wins 5 rounds clearly ... that's 7 - 5 and a clear win.

Wouldn't you agree?

Yeah but I didn't see neither guy winning 7 rounds clearly. If either guy had won 7 rounds clearly I don't think there would still be this much debating three weeks after the fight.
Wouldn't you agree??

[Madison Boxing]

yeah you said hed win easy the first time round too you buck toothed racist.