How great are you when the fighter moving up gives you lose or your hardest fight?

[Robbie Barrett]

Look it up weasel, the only one not listed on boxrec is Barrera, that was for the lineal world title belt you ***wit, 3 divisions more than your boyfriend nuffy

There's no such thing as a lineal world title belt.

[GhostofDempsey]

It's amazing how you manage to out-troll yourself with each thread you start.

[djtmal]

I never was a Hagler fan because i dont think he challenged himself...

Srl, Duran, Hearns...prime atg versions, not versions that had been ko'd already and raked thru the coals like cotto, pac, & shane...some of the greatest challenges in the history of the sport son, bar none...and you don't think he challenged himself...

floyd...he's a great boxer who made a great deal of money by taking the path of least resistance thru cultivating a good marketing scheme and money mayweather buck dancing schtick...hagler just mowed fighters down and didn't have to sell his soul...

stick to the floyd cheerleading threads and keep dudes like Hagler out your mouth cause its obvious you don't have a clue...

[NoReMaC]

end thread^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Willy Wanker]

Srl, Duran, Hearns...prime atg versions, not versions that had been ko'd already and raked thru the coals like cotto, pac, & shane...some of the greatest challenges in the history of the sport son, bar none...and you don't think he challenged himself...

floyd...he's a great boxer who made a great deal of money by taking the path of least resistance thru cultivating a good marketing scheme and money mayweather buck dancing schtick...hagler just mowed fighters down and didn't have to sell his soul...

stick to the floyd cheerleading threads and keep dudes like Hagler out your mouth cause its obvious you don't have a clue...

Real ****, good post.

Of course a Floyd fanboy thinks moving up is the only path to greatness. By that logic, Broner and Guerrero are greater than Hagler. Some people have clearly never watched boxing before 1990, or 2007 for that matter.

You can't apply today's standards to a boxer from the 80s. Winning a title used to be the pinnacle of the sport, now it's just a way to get your foot in the door so you can market yourself for easy money fights.

Hagler fought every tough fighter from his weight class regardless if they had a "name" or not, and even gave rematches to guys he lost or drew with. That's almost unheard of in today's era of fighters.

But Floyd made more money than Hagler, so Floyd > Hagler.

[betmen]

Here's the divisions Pacquiao won major world titles in.

WBC flyweight champion (112 lbs)
IBF super bantamweight champion (122 lbs)
WBC super featherweight champion (130 lbs)
WBC lightweight champion (135 lbs)
WBO welterweight champion (147 lbs) (3×)
WBC super welterweight champion (154 lbs)

How many is that? Can you count?

8 times
you forgot to add two divisions:

lineal featherweight (barerra 1)
lineal light welterweight (hatton).

but forget about the 8th division, it was phony title anyway.

[betmen]

That's not listing the titles.

List the world titles by name.

You can't you spastic, because he doesn't have 8.



What world title did he win in the Hatton fight?

well people and critics do not call pacquiao "8 divisions belt holder", they call him "8 divisions champion". since pac beat the champion of that divisions(barerra, hatton) he was the new champ of that division.

[RussB23]

Canelo isnt smaller than GGG , he just shorter. Hes actually bigger than him.

[djtmal]

But Floyd made more money than Hagler, so Floyd > Hagler.

Don't forget he beat more paper champs than Hagler as well.

[Vlad_]

The GGG win (draw by robbery) made Larry and Mirko lose their minds...