He's going to get stripped by the IBF...
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter Not Sure if Cotto Would Fight GGG in December
Collapse
-
But GGG is supposed to be getting that last belt off Saunders. If not December, when? Next Fall, after the Canelo rematch in May? Because if they wait all the way until September to do the rematch just to age GGG even more, I hope everyone here boycotts that PPV, because they have aged GGG long enough, it's complete bull****. I hope HBO and everyone puts pressure on Canelo to do the rematch no later than May at the very least.
Saunders in December. Canelo in May. 168 in December, before GGG is completely, utterly shot, and we never even get to see him vs the bigger guys. Sigh... **** they've messed up his career royally. Oscar, BHop, Loeffler, and Abel all suck.Comment
-
Wow. Here we go again with calling out a naturally smaller fighter who started his career at 140, and an old one at that. Enough with this garbage already. This hype train has worn thin. How about a rematch with the guy you barely beat - Jacobs? Want another smaller guy moving up - what about the impressive young gun Jermall Charlo, who already held a title? He was a 154 lbr., just the way you and Sanchez like them. Why no mention of him? You're supposed to be a superstar everyone fears - how about you finally man up and call out Andre Ward, you know, the guy at 168 you avoided like the plague - even at a catchweight? That is guaranteed to never happen. Just keep lining up those old welterweights and lt. middleweights. The suckers will keep buying into it and singing your praises.Comment
-
Why would GGG want to fight 154lb. Cotto @ 160? I mean GGG always says, "I'm not business man," so I don't see the point in fighting Cotto in December. Saunders is finally willing to fight GGG, and Saunders is a MW champion, so why are we talking about Cotto? Of course I'm being sarcastic! GGG is "business man" just like everyone else! He knows Cotto brings in more money than BJ Saunders, Jacobs, or Charlo! I'm not mad at him. Just stop being a hypocrite!
So I don't know if GGG is just an actor who repeats catch phrases, or if he truly means what he says when he's says he's not business man, but whether he's directing it or not, his career has definitely gone in the business-over-legacy direction lately, which is the exact opposite of what they promised GGG was to start with. And certainly it doesn't seem like GGG is telling them "no." If there's an article this week where GGG says, "I don't want Cotto. I want the belt. I told my team, I need my last belt, make the Saunders fight," then we'll have proof he meant it, but if they make the Cotto fight, in the end he signs the contract, so maybe he just trusts his team and does what they suggest, but... anyway...Comment
-
Since Cotto has been telling everyone who will listen that'd he'd fight the winner, and now he has a chance to fight the real winner for the titles, Cotto should have been expecting to take the fight at 160. Maybe he can get GGG to agree to that 159. -Shrugs-
Set it up!Comment
-
Wow. Here we go again with calling out a naturally smaller fighter who started his career at 140, and an old one at that. Enough with this garbage already. This hype train has worn thin. How about a rematch with the guy you barely beat - Jacobs? Want another smaller guy moving up - what about the impressive young gun Jermall Charlo, who already held a title? He was a 154 lbr., just the way you and Sanchez like them. Why no mention of him? You're supposed to be a superstar everyone fears - how about you finally man up and call out Andre Ward, you know, the guy at 168 you avoided like the plague - even at a catchweight? That is guaranteed to never happen. Just keep lining up those old welterweights and lt. middleweights. The suckers will keep buying into it and singing your praises.Comment
-
Why would GGG want to fight 154lb. Cotto @ 160? I mean GGG always says, "I'm not business man," so I don't see the point in fighting Cotto in December. Saunders is finally willing to fight GGG, and Saunders is a MW champion, so why are we talking about Cotto? Of course I'm being sarcastic! GGG is "business man" just like everyone else! He knows Cotto brings in more money than BJ Saunders, Jacobs, or Charlo! I'm not mad at him. Just stop being a hypocrite!Comment
-
If GGG told the truth about caring about legacy over business, that doesn't his handlers agree. It sure seems like the people running GGG's career are business men and don't care about the sport. They even seemed fine with Canelo aging GGG before they fought because they didn't care if that hurt GGG's chances to have a legacy performance and knock out Canelo, all they seemed to care about was that that would increase PPV buys.
So I don't know if GGG is just an actor who repeats catch phrases, or if he truly means what he says when he's says he's not business man, but whether he's directing it or not, his career has definitely gone in the business-over-legacy direction lately, which is the exact opposite of what they promised GGG was to start with. And certainly it doesn't seem like GGG is telling them "no." If there's an article this week where GGG says, "I don't want Cotto. I want the belt. I told my team, I need my last belt, make the Saunders fight," then we'll have proof he meant it, but if they make the Cotto fight, in the end he signs the contract, so maybe he just trusts his team and does what they suggest, but... anyway...Comment
Comment