Let's go Rigondeaux!
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Finalized For December 9
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Am going through the Walters ones now, too many to bump, I don’t usually like bumping stuffs up, but this Loma thing is getting out of hand now. You should read the Walters one. Just to terrible to even bump them.Comment
-
Comment
-
Interesting...
I've seen you trashing this fight and all of Loma's competition recently..Comment
-
That's saying something when his best fight is a Rigo moving up 2 weight classes at 38 to fight him.
Now we should push for Lomos hoe ass who is 31 to move up 2 weight classes and fight Spence or Crawford?
Would you give: Spence, Porter, Thurman or Crawford credit for knocking Lomos head off his shoulders at 147???? Don't duck the question. Would you give them credit??????Comment
-
Loma's already moved up twice.That's saying something when his best fight is a Rigo moving up 2 weight classes at 38 to fight him.
Now we should push for Lomos hoe ass who is 31 to move up 2 weight classes and fight Spence or Crawford?
Would you give: Spence, Porter, Thurman or Crawford credit for knocking Lomos head off his shoulders at 147???? Don't duck the question. Would you give them credit??????
My point is you didn't think Loma could win. You had Rigo easy but you've changed your mind on the merits. You were wrong and you have to deal with that. The fight went as I said it would so I am entitled to dismiss the fight if I want but YOU are not because it destroyed your prediction and you've pretended you didn't think Rigo would toy with him.
Do I think it was a great win for Loma? No. I am entitled to believe that. You have to give credit because he made you look foolish. Would I give those guys credit for stopping Loma? Yes I would even though I wouldn't pick Loma. Seeing how you are it's clear YOU wouldn't give Loma credit if he went up and beat those guys.Comment
-
I gave him credit for taking on a skillful opponent. Rigo was about 38 moving up 2 weight classes. I can only imagine the type of backlash, Floyd, Crawford etc... Would get fighting a 38 year old at the age of 29 who was 2 weight classes lower.Loma's already moved up twice.
My point is you didn't think Loma could win. You had Rigo easy but you've changed your mind on the merits. You were wrong and you have to deal with that. The fight went as I said it would so I am entitled to dismiss the fight if I want but YOU are not because it destroyed your prediction and you've pretended you didn't think Rigo would toy with him.
Do I think it was a great win for Loma? No. I am entitled to believe that. You have to give credit because he made you look foolish. Would I give those guys credit for stopping Loma? Yes I would even though I wouldn't pick Loma. Seeing how you are it's clear YOU wouldn't give Loma credit if he went up and beat those guys.
You and I both know that if: Danny Garcia, Crawford, Thurman, Porter, Pacquiao, Spence fought Lomo at 147 they destroy him. I'm talking sleeping on the canvas. And the number one thing people would say was Lomo was way too small.
I'm objective. Lomo is overrated period. If his name was Tyrone with that amount of fights and the SAME exact resume he wouldn't get nearly as much credit. He needs to get his weight up. Fighting bums like he did his last fight and upcoming fight won't cut it.Comment
Comment