Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would you consider Pacquiao one of the best offensive fighters of all time?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
    bro, they never had any intentions to fight manny at that time. whether they feel floyd can beat pac or not but they saw the risk fighting pac at that time.

    that's why they used the random testing as a decoy, if they really feel manny was a dirty fighter, then why didnt sr make pac take the test for the hatton fight? sr was hatton's trainer, why didnt he make them take the test? better yet after pac slept hatton in 2 (took foyd 10), why didnt sr come out with the ped accusation then?

    it's because they dont see hatton as a threat like they see cotto, and when pac beat cotto, that's when they knew pac was the real deal because before the fight, the mayweathers gave manny no shot at beating cotto and they even said pac was crazy to take that fight.

    no ped accusation before hand, but after the cotto fight, that's when the fans, media started demanding for floyd/pac and that's when the accusation started.
    facts..........................

    Comment


    • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      Because I knew you'd react to it. you have a fit whenever you think someone is trying to take credit away from Manny. You see every criticism as an attempt to smear his name or take away from his accomplishments.

      You can't change the decisions Manny made. He fought him @ 145. It was an impressive win but doesn't make up IMO for him refusing the fight we all wanted.

      but you love Manny so you will not question any decisions he made.

      Thats why I keep posting about KARMA! How his career progressed since he refused the fight IMO is justice. But hey, he got his money like you said.
      because you make no sense! LOL!! you cried that cotto only lost because it was at 145. you said cotto was drained in both fights at 145 and 146 against manny and clottey then you said if it was at 146 he might have won???? if its at 146, he's still drained remember!!! LOL

      Comment


      • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
        better question, why didnt the mayweathers accuse manny of peds after knocking hatton out in 2?? wouldnt this be the perfect time to accuse him since it took floyd 10 rounds to put hatton away?
        Why are you so worried about when they accused him? Who the **** cares. Why don't you worry about WHY PACQUIAO'S TEAM AVOIDED THE FIGHT IN 2010. Only Pacroaches would think that a contract like the following was set up just to "duck a fight by asking for a 14-day cut off for drug testing." Do you know how ****ing idiotic you guys sound?

        A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

        The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather).

        It detailed that the bout would have been on HBO Pay-Per-View at a cost of $59.95. Billing was to be "Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, presented by Top Rank, Golden Boy Promotions, Mayweather Promotions and M-P Promotions in association with [approved sponsors and the site]."

        I've asked Western, I've asked djtmal and I've asked ADP02, not one of you have had the guts to stand up and explain:


        WHY DID PACQUAIO NEED MORE THAN A 14 DAY CUT-OFF FOR DRUG TESTING?

        OH, AND KEEP IN MIND, ONE OF YOU QUOTED FREDDIE ROACH AS SAYING HE NEEDS 5 DAYS:

        Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
        here is what roach had to say during 2009 --

        "I will not let my fighter take a blood test the day before a fight," Roach said. "If they give me a five-day window or something like that I have no problem with it."

        ONCE AGAIN, SOMEONE TELL ME WHY PACQUIAO NEEDED MORE THAN A 14-DAY CUT OFF FOR DRUG TESTING.

        Comment


        • i refuse to have a debate with someone who is gonna post nothing but links. not today my friend not today. im not the one. go back to your floyd vs pac thread and debate there with links. lmao!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
            Floyd's extra stipulations on the testing was the issue. The Pac didn't have to agree to a 0 day, or even a 14day cutoff if he didn't have to, and guess what he didn't. Willing to bet the Mayweathers were counting on that.

            The rest of your post is basically on the sis-boom-bah, floyd rah rah fanboy tip, so I will let you have your fun with that.
            Blaming Manny's actions on the offer again. So weak.

            You are right, he had the right to refuse and he did. Just admit it and move on.

            Too bad though. According to you, western and some other idiot Manny fans, it was this decision that cost him a win against Floyd.

            But hey, he kept his pride and got his money so you guys see that as a win. hahaha

            Comment


            • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
              facts..........................
              you clearly do not know the definition of the word fact.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                i refuse to have a debate with someone who is gonna post nothing but links. not today my friend not today. im not the one. go back to your floyd vs pac thread and debate there with links. lmao!
                This f@g backed down. So....





                How about you, ADP02. You're used to getting your ass kicked by me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                  because you make no sense! LOL!! you cried that cotto only lost because it was at 145. you said cotto was drained in both fights at 145 and 146 against manny and clottey then you said if it was at 146 he might have won???? if its at 146, he's still drained remember!!! LOL
                  PAC laid hands on cotto.. That beating PAC applied scared fan boy fools..

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                    so you went back on your stance.

                    if pac didnt test for the 4th marquez fight, then shouldnt manny be hulk mode for it? because pac was avoiding random test for one reason right?

                    so if he didnt test in the 4th fight against marquez, then that means he was juiced up to the max!! prolly explains his cramps huh? still got knocked out doe!!
                    He more than likely was. he just got KTFO because he dropped his hands when pressing for the KO.

                    He cheated, didn't do PED testing, refused to fight Floyd, and then got KTFO. That is KARMA!! You understand what the word means now?

                    HAHAHAHAHA

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      This f@g backed down. So....





                      How about you, ADP02. You're used to getting your ass kicked by me.
                      In slow motion PAC a maniacs suffer longer.. Sad isn't it? Slow motion only works for fools in certain situations...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP