Would you consider Pacquiao one of the best offensive fighters of all time?

[travestyny]

Big Dunn said that he couldn't see how someone could have given Manny any of the other rounds.


So you disagree with Big Dunn.

I disagreed with Big Dunn too. See, who said that we cannot agree on anything? Thanks for letting us know!


.

LMAOOO. You're an absolute imbecile.

There are 2 fighters. The judges are free to judge it anyway they seem fit. Of course they could have scored all the rounds for Pacquiao you absolute moron.

By the way, you brought up Lederman, who had it more lopsided in favor of Floyd than 2 of the official judges!

You're an absolute moron. Seriously. I feel sorry for you.

[Mike D]

beating a bunch of names coming off losses and fighting them at catchweights lmao pacs offense is mediocre who did he beat at 147, 140, 135 to make any of you think he had better offense then an aaron pryor, sugar ray leonard or tommy hearns.

Your f**king screen name is TMT Forever??? Are you f**king serious?? Lmfao!!! You corny ass preteen girl motherf**ker lol

[Boxing Goat]

Ok. I can see giving him the 4th. Everyone gave him that round. I don't see how you can give him any other round scoring the fight according to proper scoring criteria.

Hold up. Before we move forward, you do know the official judges gave Manny 4 rounds right?

[Boxing Goat]

Wtf....

So in your opinion, Roy was an offensive come forward fighter, than never hung out on the outside, and always came forward looking to attack?

Because he sure as hell never did that vs Hopkins, Toney, hill, johnson, tarver, Paz, etc..

Roy would only go crazy offensively when he was against an overmatched opponent.



Roy would just move, potshot, and then counter.. he was never an aggressive come forward fighter in the vein of manny or Tyson

Roy moved laterally, then in/out and thew shots from different angles, mostly in combination. But he went first most of the time. Counter punchers don't normally go first. You do know what a counter puncher is right? Lol

[ADP02]

Big Dunn said that he couldn't see how someone could have given Manny any of the other rounds.


So you disagree with Big Dunn.

I disagreed with Big Dunn too. See, who said that we cannot agree on anything? Thanks for letting us know!


.

LMAOOO. You're an absolute imbecile.

There are 2 fighters. The judges are free to judge it anyway they seem fit. Of course they could have scored all the rounds for Pacquiao you absolute moron.

By the way, you brought up Lederman, who had it more lopsided in favor of Floyd than 2 of the official judges!

You're an absolute moron. Seriously. I feel sorry for you.

More DEFLECTIONs from the man they call DEFLECTOR!!!


STOP DEFLECTING and get with the program! "peeleft:

[FinitoxDinamita]

One of the most dynamic, unconventional offensive fighters ever. Pac was unique.

[travestyny]

More DEFLECTIONs from the man they call DEFLECTOR!!!


STOP DEFLECTING and get with the program! "peeleft:

DEFLECTING?


YOU TRIED TO JUSTIFY PAC DOING BETTER THAN THE OFFICIAL JUDGES HAD IT BY TALKING UP THE SCORECARD OF A MAN.....WHO HAD PAC DOING WORSE THAN 2 OF THE OFFICIAL JUDGES HAD IT!

I CALLED YOU ON IT. AND YOUR RESPONSE DEFLECTED TO ME AGREEING THAT THE JUDGES CAN VOTE FOR WHOMEVER THEY WANT???


Do you even have a brain? Did this happen to you?

I TOLD YOU THAT I'M GONNA KEEP KICKING YOUR ASS AROUND, BlTCH! Now tell us again how your logic about Lederman makes sense, without deflecting, LOSER!

[ADP02]

Originally Posted by The Big Dunn View Post

Ok. I can see giving him the 4th. Everyone gave him that round. I don't see how you can give him any other round scoring the fight according to proper scoring criteria.

So you agree with Manny winning Round #4. The problem with your scoring, I presume, is either being bias or you are giving Floyd all rounds that are close even though he does not deserve them.

You say that you cannot see anyone giving Manny any other round but Harold Lederman gave Manny the 2nd round. So that means that one could have scored it 2-2.

If you analyze round 3, that was clearly a Manny round but the Vegas judges didn't give it to Manny. Go check it out for yourself and come back and tell me how Floyd could have won that!

SO YES, the Vegas judges could have had it 3-1 for Manny after 4 rounds but like Juan Marquez said, you cannot beat Floyd on the cards in Vegas!




.

DEFLECTING?


YOU TRIED TO JUSTIFY PAC DOING BETTER THAN THE OFFICIAL JUDGES HAD IT BY TALKING UP THE SCORECARD OF A MAN.....WHO HAD PAC DOING WORSE THAN 2 OF THE OFFICIAL JUDGES HAD IT!

I CALLED YOU ON IT. AND YOUR RESPONSE DEFLECTED TO ME AGREEING THAT THE JUDGES CAN VOTE FOR WHOMEVER THEY WANT???


Do you even have a brain? Did this happen to you?




I TOLD YOU THAT I'M GONNA KEEP KICKING YOUR ASS AROUND, BlTCH! Now tell us again how your logic about Lederman makes sense, without deflecting, LOSER!

Sure, whatever ..... Go read above.

The topic was about the first 4 rounds and whether Manny met the criteria to win more rounds than the Vegas judges gave him.

BIG DUNN: Said that its not possible for someone to have given Manny those rounds.

ADP02: Yes it's possible and I explained that others did and I'm sure that Harold Lederman, a former judge, is basing it on the criteria.

I also analyzed round 3 and determined that the Vegas judges had the wrong guy winning that round.

After 4 rounds, the score cards could have been 3-1 Manny but it is Vegas and Floyd is the hometown guy who gets these types of advantages..


You call others imbecile but I think you should go read your responses and then look in the mirror!!!

You brought up several DEFLECTIONs and now want me to respond to your DEFLECTIONs instead of you responding directly at what the posts were about!!! .... which is who you are as a poster ..... SO YES, YOU DEFLECTED!!! "peeleft:

.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Roy moved laterally, then in/out and thew shots from different angles, mostly in combination. But he went first most of the time. Counter punchers don't normally go first. You do know what a counter puncher is right? Lol

Roy picked his shots, would lead sometimes and countered sometimes but by no means was he an offensive gunblazer like manny or Tyson or pryor or Armstrong

[travestyny]

Sure, whatever ..... Go read above.

The topic was about the first 4 rounds and whether Manny met the criteria to win more rounds than the Vegas judges gave him.

BIG DUNN: Said that its not possible for someone to have given Manny those rounds.

ADP02: Yes it's possible and I explained that others did and I'm sure that Harold Lederman, a former judge, is basing it on the criteria.

I also analyzed round 3 and determined that the Vegas judges had the wrong guy winning that round.

After 4 rounds, the score cards could have been 3-1 Manny but it is Vegas and Floyd is the hometown guy who gets these types of advantages..


You call others imbecile but I think you should go read your responses and then look in the mirror!!!

You brought up several DEFLECTIONs and now want me to respond to your DEFLECTIONs instead of you responding directly at what the posts were about!!! .... which is who you are as a poster ..... SO YES, YOU DEFLECTED!!!

.

You have poor comprehension skills. I pointed out that your logic makes no sense. You DEFLECTED away from that, didn't you.

YOUR POINT IS THAT HAD THE JUDGES SEEN THE FIGHT LIKE LEDERMAN, THEY WOULD HAVE HAD THE 2nd ROUND FOR PAC. DIDNT YOU SAY THAT?

BUT HAD THEY SEEN THE FIGHT LIKE LEDERMAN, PACQUIAO WOULD HAVE LOST BY A LARGER MARGIN THAN HE DID, YOU ABSOLUTE MORON.

EXPLAIN, BlTCH