Would you consider Pacquiao one of the best offensive fighters of all time?

[djtmal]

The negotiations fell apart earlier this year when Mayweather refused to give Pacquiao a 24-day cutoff on the testing. Mayweather wanted a 14-day cutoff. The next time they negotiate, the deal could be harder to make.

Mayweather was willing to give him a 14 day cut off on random testing.

Explain this one away

Mayweather was willing to give him......

mayweather was willing to give him what? this wasn't some no name b lister that money was sitting down with...mayweather wasn't no bigger than pac in 2009 imo...

[The Big Dunn]

I asked him this already but he wouldnt touch it. Lol.

If floyd could beat manny easily then why walk because of testing.

Huh? I answered it directly. Check the thread.

Floyd didn't walk. The article djtmal posted states that Bob then called the fight off.

I mean FFS dude do you know how to read? Roach then admitted whose fault it was.

I mean, geez, Bob said he called the fight off, Roach says it was Manny and his team, and you and djtmal still try to blame Floyd.

[WesternChamp]

Not exactly dude. Floyd went from 0 days to 14 days, which is a compromise. manny didn't budge. So its clear one guy wanted to fight and the other wanted to posture.

One guy wanted to fight and one wanted to posture? Then why ask for random testing if he knows that's not gonna get him the fight? HEEELLLLLOOOOO???

[WesternChamp]

Huh? I answered it directly. Check the thread.

Floyd didn't walk. The article djtmal posted states that Bob then called the fight off.

I mean FFS dude do you know how to read? Roach then admitted whose fault it was.

I mean, geez, Bob said he called the fight off, Roach says it was Manny and his team, and you and djtmal still try to blame Floyd.

Floyd didnt walk??? So why didnt the fight happen then??

[The Big Dunn]

Mayweather was willing to give him......

mayweather was willing to give him what? this wasn't some no name b lister that money was sitting down with...mayweather wasn't no bigger than pac in 2009 imo...

Of course he was. He was earning far larger purses and his fights were grossing far more both at the gate and in PPV sales. This is documented.

I mean this is like someone trying to argue Cotto was as big as Manny.

[djtmal]

I asked him this already but he wouldnt touch it. Lol.

If floyd could beat manny easily then why walk because of testing.

exactly....because as we have come to know...especially with this low risk (or no risk) high reward fighter...he don't take a fight unless he's absolutely, positively sure he's gonna win...

[The Big Dunn]

Floyd didnt walk??? So why didnt the fight happen then??

Did you read the article djtmal posted that you just cosigned? It says it right there.

[WesternChamp]

They didn't fight because Manny refused to fight. Floyd offered different cutoff dates which Manny and his team also refused. This was verified by the media and Manny's trainer Freddy Roach.

So again, why can't you just admit this? Does it make Manny lesser of a man in your eyes if you admit he refused to fight?

I thought you said pac refuse testing. Now pac is refusing to fight??

You didnt explain why floyd walked? So manny refuse testing, why walk over that if floyd and yourself believe floyd would have beaten manny anyways?

[The Big Dunn]

One guy wanted to fight and one wanted to posture? Then why ask for random testing if he knows that's not gonna get him the fight? HEEELLLLLOOOOO???

HUH?? How would anyone know asking for testing would make manny refuse to fight?

[The Big Dunn]

I thought you said pac refuse testing. Now pac is refusing to fight??

You didnt explain why floyd walked? So manny refuse testing, why walk over that if floyd and yourself believe floyd would have beaten manny anyways?

Floyd didn't, Bob did. read the article that you cosigned.