The Way Gonzalez Fought Was Embarrassing

[IronDanHamza]

Maidana? That was a cherry-pick that backfired on Floyd. He asked his own fans to vote on his next opponent (only gave them Maidana and Khan to choose from) and the majority voted Khan. Yet, Floyd still picked Maidana because he was flat-footed, slower and already lost to Khan. Three fights before Mayweather he fought a guy who was 13-3-1, then fought Josesito Lopez, and then Broner. Prior to those world-beaters he fought Soto-Karass and lost to Alexander. Next?

I didn't ask for reasons why Mayweather chose Maidana.

So this is funny, you are now ****ting on Maidana and his competiton. Ok.

You are aware that Rungvasai hadn't fought a fighter with a winning record, or if they did have a winning record they had 10 or more losses in all of his fights two years prior to the first Gonzalez fight right?

Is that really the way you want to go with this?

[GhostofDempsey]

I didn't ask for reasons why Mayweather chose Maidana.

So this is funny, you are now ****ting on Maidana and his competiton. Ok.

You are aware that Rungvasai hadn't fought a fighter with a winning record, or if they did have a winning record they had 10 or more losses in all of his fights two years prior to the first Gonzalez fight right?

Is that really the way you want to go with this?

You didn't ask for reasons because the reasons were pathetic, just like the rest of his cherry-picked opponents.

Here's the difference, Floyd claims to be TBE and his fans eat that up by the spoonful. Gonzalez was a humble warrior whose fights were way more entertaining. He lost to Rung because he aged overnight. It happens to fighters. They go through enough tough battles and fights will age you faster than birthdays. If you weren't such a simpleton you would understand that. It's really sad that it need to be explained to you. But, that's the life of a casual.

[uppercut510]

he looked defeated b4 the fight as well, still a good fighter tho but this may be it

[IronDanHamza]

You didn't ask for reasons because the reasons were pathetic, just like the rest of his cherry-picked opponents.

Here's the difference, Floyd claims to be TBE and his fans eat that up by the spoonful. Gonzalez was a humble warrior whose fights were way more entertaining. He lost to Rung because he aged overnight. It happens to fighters. They go through enough tough battles and fights will age you faster than birthdays. If you weren't such a simpleton you would understand that. It's really sad that it need to be explained to you. But, that's the life of a casual.

You don't need to justify Roman's loss to me.

Nor do you need to compare Roman and Floyd's level of modesty as it's irrelevant to your ridiculous claim.

You just attempted to **** on Maidana because he fought a guy that was 13-3-1.

Rungvasai's last 15 opponents 3 years prior to the first Roman fight;

0-0
0-0
0-0
12-19
3-5
12-10
28-22
21-37
34-2
10-20
5-2
18-26
11-5
22-24
6-10

I'll ask again, are you really sure that's the road you want to go down?

Maidana was a cherry pick huh?

Ok, name me Rungvasai's 5 best wins prior to Roman 1. Since Mayweather never fought anyone as dangerous.

[uppercut510]

I didn't ask for reasons why Mayweather chose Maidana.

So this is funny, you are now ****ting on Maidana and his competiton. Ok.

You are aware that Rungvasai hadn't fought a fighter with a winning record, or if they did have a winning record they had 10 or more losses in all of his fights two years prior to the first Gonzalez fight right?

Is that really the way you want to go with this?

that guy is delusional just let him have it lolololol

[uppercut510]

You don't need to justify Roman's loss to me.

Nor do you need to compare Roman and Floyd's level of modesty as it's irrelevant to your ridiculous claim.

You just attempted to **** on Maidana because he fought a guy that was 13-3-1.

Rungvasai's last 15 opponents 3 years prior to the first Roman fight;

0-0
0-0
0-0
12-19
3-5
12-10
28-22
21-37
34-2
10-20
5-2
18-26
11-5
22-24
6-10

I'll ask again, are you really sure that's the road you want to go down?

Maidana was a cherry pick huh?

Ok, name me Rungvasai's 5 best wins prior to Roman 1. Since Mayweather never fought anyone as dangerous.

he said romans resume was better than andre wards!!!!

[GhostofDempsey]

You don't need to justify Roman's loss to me.

Nor do you need to compare Roman and Floyd's level of modesty as it's irrelevant to your ridiculous claim.

You just attempted to **** on Maidana because he fought a guy that was 13-3-1.

Rungvasai's last 15 opponents 3 years prior to the first Roman fight;

0-0
0-0
0-0
12-19
3-5
12-10
28-22
21-37
34-2
10-20
5-2
18-26
11-5
22-24
6-10

I'll ask again, are you really sure that's the road you want to go down?

Maidana was a cherry pick huh?

Ok, name me Rungvasai's 5 best wins prior to Roman 1. Since Mayweather never fought anyone as dangerous.

Rung has less opposition to choose from. So he won't be fighting names that most casuals will recognize in a weight class that doesn't get nearly as much exposure at WW. But, like I stated in an earlier post, Rung beat a Gonzalez who CLEARLY aged overnight. Tough fights caught up to him and showed signs of a fighter whose heart just isn't in it any longer and/or just cannot compete at this level any longer. This is what happens when you fight with all of your heart and give it your all in the ring. That sentiment is lost on your Floyd fanboys. My point still stands, Floyd never truly tested himself and avoided the toughest fights during his career.

[IronDanHamza]

he said romans resume was better than andre wards!!!!

[IronDanHamza]

Rung has less opposition to choose from. So he won't be fighting names that most casuals will recognize in a weight class that doesn't get nearly as much exposure at WW. But, like I stated in an earlier post, Rung beat a Gonzalez who CLEARLY aged overnight. Tough fights caught up to him and showed signs of a fighter whose heart just isn't in it any longer and/or just cannot compete at this level any longer. This is what happens when you fight with all of your heart and give it your all in the ring. That sentiment is lost on your Floyd fanboys.

Rung has less opposition to choose from?

You are aware Rung has had more fights than Maidana has?

This a Boxing forum you know that right? Are you lost?

You just used the fact that Maidana fought a 13-3 guy as a reason to claim he wasn't a dangerous fight yet I just showed you Rungs last 15 fights across a span of 3 years prior to Roman 1. In response to that you have babbled about irrelevant nonsense.

YOU claimed Mayweather hasn't fought anyone as dangerous, YOU claimed Maidana wasn't as dangerous and citied his opposition as a reason.

Go ahead and name me Rung's 5 best wins prior to Roman 1.

Scratch that, go ahead and name me his 3 best wins prior to Roman 1.

[uppercut510]

Rung has less opposition to choose from. So he won't be fighting names that most casuals will recognize in a weight class that doesn't get nearly as much exposure at WW. But, like I stated in an earlier post, Rung beat a Gonzalez who CLEARLY aged overnight. Tough fights caught up to him and showed signs of a fighter whose heart just isn't in it any longer and/or just cannot compete at this level any longer. This is what happens when you fight with all of your heart and give it your all in the ring. That sentiment is lost on your Floyd fanboys. My point still stands, Floyd never truly tested himself and avoided the toughest fights during his career.

bro hes a good fighter he didn't age overnight he just got his azz beat, it happens.... I think he won that first fight but he didn't even seem motivated in this one and fought a terrible fight. no need for excuses hes only 30