Anything other than 8 rounds to 4 for Jacobs vs. Triple G is a TRAVESTY!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35717
    • 3,849
    • 3,389
    • 378,304

    #21
    Originally posted by Mr_Forte
    I personally feel that rounds 3,4,5,8,9 were clear cut for Golovkin. Plus extra point for GGG in round 4. I also think Jacobs clearly won 6,7,10, and 11. No debate in my mind.

    So it basically comes down to how each individual feels about rounds 1,2,& 12.

    Even if you gave all three to Jacobs...it's a 114-113 win for DJ. If just one of those rounds goes to GGG then it's 6-6 fight with golovkin winning 114-113 cause of the knockdown. Clearly no a robbery.

    It was a good fight. Could DJ have won...yes. Did he dominate GGG...no.
    Pretty much this. I thought 3, 7 and 8 were the swing rounds, first 2 were Jacobs rounds. Fight could have gone either way.

    Comment

    • juandabomb
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 2629
      • 107
      • 0
      • 21,659

      #22
      8 to 4 jacobs??? man stay off the wack crack bruh...that's worse than ross

      Comment

      • Schmerzen
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 2554
        • 121
        • 146
        • 10,313

        #23
        my initial feeling right after the fight was that floyd clearly won. i have watched the fight again and couldn't believe there are people saying manny should have got the decision. some people thought it was a draw, but i don't think pac deserved a draw. he just couldn't handle floyd's jab.

        Comment

        • RetroSpeed05
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2014
          • 4733
          • 358
          • 13
          • 192,403

          #24
          Originally posted by Mammoth
          Pretty much this. I thought 3, 7 and 8 were the swing rounds, first 2 were Jacobs rounds. Fight could have gone either way.
          Huh? Jacobs backpedaled and landed nothing the entire round while ggg was the aggressor and beat him with a jab alone that round. Interesting the ones that seem to think there guy won a fight never do fight breakdown or film studies making fun of the "seeing a fight in slow motion" term after it was used in the May vs Pac fight even though its been done before by everybody who cares to learn about boxing.

          Comment

          • SilverMiles
            It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2014
            • 4458
            • 494
            • 103
            • 35,552

            #25
            Jacobs clearly lost.

            Comment

            • Jewish-Reptile
              COLD HEARTBREAKER
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 10708
              • 922
              • 1,095
              • 15,382

              #26
              Originally posted by Mammoth
              Jesus christ............
              This guy has no credibility and is completely hindered by bias, he preaches watching fights with an open mind yet appears not to heed his own advice.

              Comment

              • Jewish-Reptile
                COLD HEARTBREAKER
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 10708
                • 922
                • 1,095
                • 15,382

                #27
                Originally posted by Mammoth
                Pretty much this. I thought 3, 7 and 8 were the swing rounds, first 2 were Jacobs rounds. Fight could have gone either way.
                You guys look way too deep, I watched it once and had Jacobs narrowly winning. You don't have to justify why you didn't listen to the commentary team and are able to score a fight yourself, that's what these clowns do, they haven't a clue about scoring fights.

                Comment

                • Jewish-Reptile
                  COLD HEARTBREAKER
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 10708
                  • 922
                  • 1,095
                  • 15,382

                  #28
                  Originally posted by SilverMiles
                  Jacobs clearly lost.
                  Golovkin was clearly fortunate to win.

                  Comment

                  • stealthradon
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2017
                    • 3283
                    • 108
                    • 2
                    • 30,404

                    #29
                    Originally posted by PunchMeIDareYou
                    Just watched the fight for the first time and Jacobs had Triple G befuddled and confused throughout the entire fight. Triple G had his moments here and there but Jacobs maintained his composure and outboxed Triple G silly. That was a flat out ROBBERY!
                    Do not operate heavy machinery.

                    Which 8 rounds did Jacobs win in your book?

                    Comment

                    • SilverMiles
                      It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2014
                      • 4458
                      • 494
                      • 103
                      • 35,552

                      #30
                      Originally posted by ScottWeiland
                      Golovkin was clearly fortunate to win.
                      Fortune is for the mediocre, Golovkin took his win. Tougher than expected but a clear winner.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP