I respect your intellectual honesty. My point when I bring up Hopkins and Golovkin is to show that up to this point in their careers they are very similar. What happens from Canelo and on we'll see.
I don't believe Golovkin will be able to do what Hopkins did post 160 because one I think Bernard is pretty much a freak of nature physically. The man was able to perform at an exceptionally high level well into his 40s. Second he wasn't at a significant physical disadvantage at 168lbs and even 175lbs. I think Golovkin's max is 168lbs and he'll be small at that.
Let's say Golovkin beat Canelo and fought 5 more fights at MW beating the likes of Jacobs again, Charlo and I don't know whoever and then retired. I think he'd go down as one of the best Middleweigths of all time but yes he'd definitely be viewed as something less than Hopkins overall.
I don't believe Golovkin will be able to do what Hopkins did post 160 because one I think Bernard is pretty much a freak of nature physically. The man was able to perform at an exceptionally high level well into his 40s. Second he wasn't at a significant physical disadvantage at 168lbs and even 175lbs. I think Golovkin's max is 168lbs and he'll be small at that.
Let's say Golovkin beat Canelo and fought 5 more fights at MW beating the likes of Jacobs again, Charlo and I don't know whoever and then retired. I think he'd go down as one of the best Middleweigths of all time but yes he'd definitely be viewed as something less than Hopkins overall.
Comment