Comments Thread For: Aldo Says McGregor Getting Too Much Credit For Boxing Debut

[HarvardBlue]

Lol

Brook had an out of this world better chance to beat GGG than did Conor, an 0-0 amateur had of beating unbeaten Floyd Mayweather. It's nowhere close to being debatable.

Are you being serious?

Brook wasn't going to win the fight. Golovkin treated him like Mayweather treated McGregor. Neither one showed any respect because they knew Brook or McGregor couldn't hurt them. Golovkin said so himself after the fight. Whether you think his chances were out of this world Golovkin did not.

[whoelsebutjames]

Right, but there are a ton of complaining black fighters, most notably Broner, why aren't they on your poll? That was my question.

Nah, I won't be adding Adrien "Mikey brushed my hair " Broner or Adrien " y'all still gone pay to see me" Broner to my list. He's an ass but he didn't cry. See the difference?

And asking me to arbitrarily add black people to a list that wasn't meant to be racist is telling in itself?? Lol

Who is the biggest cry baby in recent history

Sergei "born again" Kovalev

Manny " I thought I won the fight" Pacquiao

Connor "3 rounds" McGreggor

Gennady "I'm a small middleweight" Golovkin

*

pollcode.com free polls

[Boxing Goat]

Brook wasn't going to win the fight. Golovkin treated him like Mayweather treated McGregor. Neither one showed any respect because they knew Brook or McGregor couldn't hurt them. Golovkin said so himself after the fight. Whether you think his chances were out of this world Golovkin did not.

I guess I'm beating a dead horse, but I'll give this one more try.

In general: Who has a better chance?

An undefeated boxer who has already beaten world champions with years of amateur and pro experience, beating the no.2 P4P fighter?

or:

An MMA champion with 2 amateur boxing fights and not a single pro round, beating the undisputed P4P best fighter over the last decade or so?

Take as much time as you need fella.

[Boxing Goat]

Nah, I won't be adding Adrien "Mikey brushed my hair " Broner or Adrien " y'all still gone pay to see me" Broner to my list. He's an ass but he didn't cry. See the difference?

And asking me to arbitrarily add black people to a list that wasn't meant to be racist is telling in itself?? Lol

None of the fighters in your bogus poll cried either genius

[HarvardBlue]

I guess I'm beating a dead horse, but I'll give this one more try.

In general: Who has a better chance?

An undefeated boxer who has already beaten world champions with years of amateur and pro experience, beating the no.2 P4P fighter?

or:

An MMA champion with 2 amateur boxing fights and not a single pro round, beating the undisputed P4P best fighter over the last decade or so?

Take as much time as you need fella.

Well, I guess I'm beating a dead goat.

Technically, you're right. An undefeated professional boxer fairs better in a boxing match. But, this isn't about technicalities. I mentioned Brook's and Khan's chances vs McGregor's chances. You're stuck on Brook (I'm assuming because it involves Golovkin).

If you want rate all 3 chances in terms of percentages, that's up to you. However, anyone that know anything about boxing knew all 3 were going to lose. Why you're trying to box me in and saying Brooks chances were better is a demonstration of your own bias. I'm saying it didn't matter if his chances were better than Khan against Canelo or McGregor against Mayweather the bottom line is he was still going lose. The only chance ALL 3 had was Devine intervention. I don't base any prediction on miracles.

[Boxing Goat]

Well, I guess I'm beating a dead goat.

Technically, you're right. An undefeated professional boxer fairs better in a boxing match. But, this isn't about technicalities. I mentioned Brook's and Khan's chances vs McGregor's chances. You're stuck on Brook (I'm assuming because it involves Golovkin).

If you want rate all 3 chances in terms of percentages, that's up to you. However, anyone that know anything about boxing knew all 3 were going to lose. Why you're trying to box me in and saying Brooks chances were better is a demonstration of your own bias. I'm saying it didn't matter if his chances were better than Khan against Canelo or McGregor against Mayweather the bottom line is he was still going lose. The only chance ALL 3 had was Devine intervention. I don't base any prediction on miracles.

It's Goat as in Greatest of All Time.

And this has clearly went over your head. I give up.

[Reloaded]

I guess I'm beating a dead horse, but I'll give this one more try.

In general: Who has a better chance?

An undefeated boxer who has already beaten world champions with years of amateur and pro experience, beating the no.2 P4P fighter?

or:

An MMA champion with 2 amateur boxing fights and not a single pro round, beating the undisputed P4P best fighter over the last decade or so?

Take as much time as you need fella.

It depends on how the opponent prepares for each fighter.

If a guy trains at 30% is he better or worse than when trained at 100% , take your time.

[Boxing Goat]

It depends on how the opponent prepares for each fighter.

If a guy trains at 30% is he better or worse than when trained at 100% , take your time.

No it doesn't matter when one mma fighter has 1% of the training and experience that the p4p world champion boxer has. Stop making excuses.