How long does McGreggor last Vs 29 year old Mayweather?

[Eff Pandas]

You are? So why is your first post that I responded to this;



Who are you responding to with this post because I'm pretty sure everyone in the thread is talking about a 29 year old Floyd. You know, the thread topic.

Cmon on man really lol. You are a dense ass smart guy you know that right?

Have some of you cats even seen Floyd fight before or do you just not respect Conor?

Cuz you know Floyd hasn't KO'd anyone in 3 rounds or less since Angel Mandredy in 1998 for mfing sakes lmfao. Floyd isn't Tyson you dipsh^ts. Floyd figures you out & takes you out in the mid rounds or 11-1's, 10-2's you.

Do you not see how this could be directed at the dipsh^ts who think Floyd was Tysoning fools in 3 rounds or less like some cats were saying in this very thread before my post?

What I said in my post has been Floyd's style since he got to the elite level of opposition. He's been doing that since his mid 20's til Saturday. And some cats were saying Floyd would KO Conor in 1 like they've never even seen Floyd fight before.

[Ray*]

Mayweather takes his time with you, I know he destroyed Gatti but he was 28 and at 140 and really really hungry at that point. I know he has zero respect for Connor but i still feel he would take his time and probably stop Connor around the 8th round.

[IronDanHamza]

Cmon on man really lol. You are a dense ass smart guy you know that right?


Do you not see how this could be directed at the dipsh^ts who think Floyd was Tysoning fools in 3 rounds or less like some cats were saying in this very thread before my post?

What I said in my post has been Floyd's style since he got to the elite level of opposition. He's been doing that since his mid 20's til Saturday. And some cats were saying Floyd would KO Conor in 1 like they've never even seen Floyd fight before.

So what you are saying is your post in this thread, about how a 29 year old Floyd would fair against McGregor, was in response to what people said about how a 40 year old Floyd would fair against McGregor?

No I can't see that. Who in this thread said that a 40 year old Floyd would knock McGregor out in 3 rounds?

We know what a 40 old Floyd does to McGregor it just happened 3 days ago.

You seem seriously confused.

[Squ□redCircle34]

Pretty Boy Floyd gives McGregor another Mercy stoppage by the ref in 6 or drops him hard and the ref calls it off after taking a beating!

Folks don't understand, that was Mayweather with less wear and tear on his hands!

He started wearing orthopedic gloves around 30-31 to keep his career going or his hand problems would've ended his career!

[Eff Pandas]

So what you are saying is your post in this thread, about how a 29 year old Floyd would fair against McGregor, was in response to what people said about how a 40 year old Floyd would fair against McGregor?

No I can't see that. Who in this thread said that a 40 year old Floyd would knock McGregor out in 3 rounds?

We know what a 40 old Floyd does to McGregor it just happened 3 days ago.

You seem seriously confused.

Like I said you are the smartest dumb guy on this forum. And I'm not talking about a 40 year old Floyd. Holy sh^t man do you get SSI but read alot or something?

Oh thats hilarious one is you lmfao.

3 rounds, 4 max.

Could easily last 1.

as long as Floyd wanted him to last

Lol with a 154 pound rehydration limit about 4 minutes and 37 seconds

he'd probably stop coming forward after the first round or two. might even get hurt in the first round or two.

And 3 or 4 guys said 4 rounds, but I'm tired of quoting & I said 3 rounds specifically even though I think 4 rounds is more or less in the same ballpark of nuttiness.

Hatton & Sharmba where both smaller guys who moved up like Floyd. Ortiz is the only legit 147lber who Floyd KO'd & I think we all agree that wasn't realllllly a legit KO, but protect yourself at all times & all that obviously. Conor is probably a legit 154lber more than a 147lber cuz he used to look like death making that weight. But regardless he's a bigger mfer & the biggest mfer Floyd has ever KO'd.

[McNulty]

[img]https://ugc.kn3.net/i/760x/https://media.*****.com/media/dgfw4r4tj8sym/*****.gif[/img]

ahh hahaha!!!

[IronDanHamza]

Like I said you are the smartest dumb guy on this forum. And I'm not talking about a 40 year old Floyd. Holy sh^t man do you get SSI but read alot or something?

You aren't talking about a 40 year old Floyd?

So why did you say you were when you brought up those 50 bullet points?

And 3 or 4 guys said 4 rounds, but I'm tired of quoting & I said 3 rounds specifically even though I think 4 rounds is more or less in the same ballpark of nuttiness.

Hatton & Sharmba where both smaller guys who moved up like Floyd. Ortiz is the only legit 147lber who Floyd KO'd & I think we all agree that wasn't realllllly a legit KO, but protect yourself at all times & all that obviously. Conor is probably a legit 154lber more than a 147lber cuz he used to look like death making that weight. But regardless he's a bigger mfer & the biggest mfer Floyd has ever KO'd.

Right because they are talking about a 29 year old Floyd.

No one is claiming Floyd is a Mike Tyson esque aggressive KO puncher at age 29. You have formed that conclusion for other people yourself.

People are claiming a 29 year old Floyd could take out Conor quickly because Conor is dog**** when it comes to Boxing.

The fact Sharmba Mitchell is smaller than Conor is irrelevant. He's on a different straosphere to him in regards to Boxing and Floyd took him out in 6. It's totally logical to think that same person can take McGregor out in half that time.

Which was my original response in the first place to which you starting talking about the fact he's 40 and what not. But now you are saying you aren't saying that so I'm lost at this point as to what your point even is.

[DuckAdonis]

2 rounds at most tbh

[Eff Pandas]

You aren't talking about a 40 year old Floyd?

So why did you say you were when you brought up those 50 bullet points?

I mighta got on a rant with that response. The Conor stuff was the main point along with Floyd's historic strategy in a fight.

Right because they are talking about a 29 year old Floyd.

No one is claiming Floyd is a Mike Tyson esque aggressive KO puncher at age 29. You have formed that conclusion for other people yourself.

People are claiming a 29 year old Floyd could take out Conor quickly because Conor is dog**** when it comes to Boxing.

The fact Sharmba Mitchell is smaller than Conor is irrelevant. He's on a different straosphere to him in regards to Boxing and Floyd took him out in 6. It's totally logical to think that same person can take McGregor out in half that time.

When did Floyd ever KO a guy who outweighed him by 20lbs at any age regardless of skill level? The awkwardness of Conor is just another degree of difficulty with taking him out quick. And its not like Conor wasn't athletic or quick himself which wouldn't make taking him out super early any easier for young Floyd.

Fair play on 6-8 rounds, but 3 rounds I don't see for what would be in front of Floyd.

[IronDanHamza]

I mighta got on a rant with that response. The Conor stuff was the main point along with Floyd's historic strategy in a fight.



When did Floyd ever KO a guy who outweighed him by 20lbs at any age regardless of skill level? The awkwardness of Conor is just another degree of difficulty with taking him out quick. And its not like Conor wasn't athletic or quick himself which wouldn't make taking him out super early any easier for young Floyd.

Fair play on 6-8 rounds, but 3 rounds I don't see for what would be in front of Floyd.

He never has but he's also never fought anyone as usless as McGregor.

No way in hell does he go 6. I can't fathom the thought of that possibility.