Tweet
Originally posted by boxing42
View Post
-
yea the ******* media hides all the shady things peta does... It never gets much media attention -
Yeah. They kill people to make wallets and belts with their skin.Originally posted by kafkod View Post
What an ignorant comment my friend.Comment
-
Lol. Go find a croc and give it a hug, see what happens!Originally posted by DominiBox View PostYeah. They kill people to make wallets and belts with their skin.
What an ignorant comment my friend.
Crocs have been around for over 200 million years, and there are as many of them now as there was when they shared the earth with dinosaurs.
Crocs don't need bleeding hearts to worry about them. They'll probably still be here after we've gone the way of the dinosaurs. Save that for endangered species like elephants, rhino's etc.Last edited by kafkod; 08-25-2017, 07:45 PM.Comment
-
-
How the hell do they know if it wasn't a dead Croc?
Lots of people and tribes who are sensitive about resources use an animals skin after they are deceased.
Cycle of life... Animal skin provides warmth, shelter, etc...
Time to bring the boys out...
Comment
-
It would be cooler if it was made from Sulaimon skin as opposed to crocodile.Comment
-
'The Money Belt'? How ****** is it to call this one off belt after one of the challenger's monikers/handle? What if they'd called it the four leaf clover belt?
Jesus Christ the officials at the WBC are either fools or are actually showing a preference for Mayweather.
It ought to have been called the diamond belt, the combat king belt, or something that pertains or relates to what the event is about.
They may as well have called it the Floyd Mayweather belt.
As for the crocodile skin angle, I must agree with PETA, only because it further shows how out of touch the WBC is. Do they have PR advisors, or do they just sit around brainstorming this crap?Comment
-
'The ******* media'? Are you referring to any media outlet that doesn't trot out extreme right wing propaganda such as Nationalism, war mongering, distorting statistics, whipping up outrage and fear to incite people to distrust and be prejudicial against one another, describes anyone who doesn't subscribe to a black and white American view of the world?
In case you haven't noticed, the largest and most ubiquitous, prodigious media conglomerates are owned by men who regularly donate to parties with economically ******* agendas.
For example here in Australia, Rupert Murdoch is an avid conservative who consistently campaigns to have public broadcasting shut down, internet content priced, and so on.
These types of individuals are the ones creating and financing right-wing think tanks such as the Heartland Foundation, who do nothing more than lobby Government for deregulation, smaller Government, lower corporate taxes, and persistently try to muddy the waters of debate over issues like climate change.
Here in Australia, Murdoch and his News Corp own 70% of the print media, and it's all tabloid gutter journalism with an inherent economic and social right wing agenda.
We don't have ANY major networks that could be called remotely '*******', or 'progressive'. The entire political system is shifting to the right.
The ********s have been steadily moving to the right and adopting more conservative policies. The closest thing I can see to a neutral news media outlet in the states is PBS.
If you're a right winger or conservative you should be rejoicing! The only bastion of progressivism is in small pockets of grass roots movements, mainly young people sympathetic to social justice issues, and social justice advocacy that flies in the face of traditional christian conservatism. Social media is perhaps the only place where you might see a predominance of '*******' opinion, but even then it's met with vitriol, hate speech etc.Comment
-
Floyd's getting fu@ked right in the old ass =)Comment
-
Comment