These orgs never forced Wlad to fight both mandatories every year, only one. They worked around it for him. Why aren't they giving Joshua the same treatment?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: IBF: Joshua Must Fight Pulev Next, Must Reach Deal By 9/3
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostThese orgs never forced Wlad to fight both mandatories every year, only one. They worked around it for him. Why aren't they giving Joshua the same treatment?
Wlad had to face not only 2 back to back mandatories it was in fact three as they began to come thick and fast upon holding all the belts.
Povetkin WBA then Leapai WBO followed by Pulev for the IBF.
Joshua does not have to be a unified champ if he decides he does not want to be dictated too whom he will face, the Brits will gladly pay to see him face scrubs the level Wilder has been facing whilst not facing a solitary mnadatory holding only one paper title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostNot true at all.
Wlad had to face not only 2 back to back mandatories it was in fact three as they began to come thick and fast upon holding all the belts.
Povetkin WBA then Leapai WBO followed by Pulev for the IBF.
Joshua does not have to be a unified champ if he decides he does not want to be dictated too whom he will face, the Brits will gladly pay to see him face scrubs the level Wilder has been facing whilst not facing a solitary mnadatory holding only one paper title.Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 08-04-2017, 07:34 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gentblue View PostWell the IBF doesn't mess around when it comes to Mandos( no matter how ******ed they can be) and it's suggested that Ortiz allowed Klitz and AJ too fight for the title. I think Ortiz should get the first crack but I have no dog in this fight so meh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostBut fought only 1 mandatory in over 2 years before. He also had 3 belts not 2. They accommodated Klitschko but are forcing Joshua to drop 1 of his two belts.
Defending against Fury the WBO and WBA agreed it would be a combined mandatory upon the WBO enforcing Fury the WBA saw sense and named him mandatory too, could be something to do with the fact it was going to be a ppv.
You really need to check your facts before posting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostUpon beating Haye he had 18 months from the date the next wba regular champ picked up the strap, still obligated to defend the IBF and WBO whom waited in rotation, he puts those belts on the line every time.
Defending against Fury the WBO and WBA agreed it would be a combined mandatory upon the WBO enforcing Fury the WBA saw sense and named him mandatory too, could be something to do with the fact it was going to be a ppv.
You really need to check your facts before posting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Randall Cunning View PostThe IBF mandatory was due before the Klitschko fight though, before he even had the WBA, they granted Joshua an exception so he could fight Klitschko, then another for the rematch.
Think he'll just give up the WBA, Ortiz's lot are gunna be difficult to deal with, always ranting about taking people to court
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostThe fact is he had 1 mandatory in over 2 years and 3 voluntary defences. He had 3 belts. They accommodated him. But aren't doing the same for Joshua. They're putting Joshua in an impossible position where he has to choose which to keep.
What's the timeframe of this 1 mandatory in over two years ? Who did he face in that period ?
Comment
Comment