Originally posted by DannYankee
View Post
Also, what else makes people say Broner is bad is that he lost to Porter and Maidana. But didn't Maidana almost beat Floyd (close) in the first fight? Didn't Maidana destroy an undefeated Victor Ortiz? Porter himself is good, but not elite.
All i'm saying is that people's opinion of Broner doesn't really match anything else they say. If people want to say Broner is a mediocre/bad fighter, then their permission to say that Broner was a good win for Mikey is revoked. Beating a "mediocre" is not a "good" win. Beating a mediocre fighter is a mediocre win.
But people say it's his best win??? LOL what?
It IS, but then they say he's bad/mediocre, you see where i'm going with this? It just makes no sense.
Comment