I mean, he lost though and it wasn't no robbery. Best case scenario, similar to Kovalev-Ward I, is you can argue Jacobs made it a totally tied, even fight on punches through 12 rounds, in which case the tiebreakers you look to first to decide a winner are (1) that GGG came forward all night, (2) that GGG got the only knockdown, and (3) that GGG was the champion.
And that's best case scenario for Jacobs. More realistically, GGG already won just looking at more, cleaner punches, and you don't even need to look at that other criteria to judge who won.
And that's best case scenario for Jacobs. More realistically, GGG already won just looking at more, cleaner punches, and you don't even need to look at that other criteria to judge who won.
Comment