You are so damned ******ed that you go off the tangent and bring Walters into the conversation which has nothing to do with the tangent and only shows that not only are you are a hater, you are desperate and grabbing at straws. You said Why would it take him this long to be ready to fight Rigondeaux?" and were dead wrong and I torched your a$$. Keep flaunting your ******ity like it is a badge oh honor!
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm Ready To Fight Guillermo Rigondeaux Next!
Collapse
-
Actually Walters is relevant to the conversation. Almost the same scenario is playing out with Rigondeaux as it did with Walters. Negotiate, bad mouth the other fighter for the fight not happening, then when it seems like the situation is more advantageous to Lomachenko, agree to fight. Yes I asked why it took so long because they negotiated before, now when the other fighter say let's fight, they put out some BS tweet saying his management need to reach out to the promoter when they could easily do the same thing. Why would they put out a statement saying he is "ready" to fight Rigondeaux when he should have been ready 2 years ago? I don't understand why this is so hard for you to understand.You are so damned ******ed that you go off the tangent and bring Walters into the conversation which has nothing to do with the tangent and only shows that not only are you are a hater, you are desperate and grabbing at straws. You said Why would it take him this long to be ready to fight Rigondeaux?" and were dead wrong and I torched your a$$. Keep flaunting your ******ity like it is a badge oh honor!
As far as being hater. I've said before that I think Lomachenko is the best fighter today. I also said I think he could beat Rigondeaux. If you weren't so busy playing "gotcha" you would realize that I actually think highly of Lomachenko as a fighter. What I don't like is this diva attitude him and his team are taking when it comes to his career.Comment
-
Comment
-
You're missing the point! He didnt say he was now ready to fight Rigo, he has been ready for 2 years. He said he was ready to fight him in the fall which has to do with availability, not a ready to finally fight him statement. The fall is the qualifier. It is about interpreting the variables. This is the same as the famous saying that goes "Throw mama out the window" as opposed to "throw mama out the window a kiss". The word "Kiss" is the qualifier that makes the entire sentence have an entirely different meaning. "Throw mama" is the common denominator, the "Kiss" is the qualifier. End of thread.Last edited by richardt; 07-26-2017, 12:19 AM.Comment
-
That is the best analogy you could come with? Here's a better one. Say you and I were friends. I know hard to believe. And you told me in 2015, "Man I'm ready to quit my job and find a better one." Even entertained a couple job offers but couldn't decide. Then 2 years later, you're still in the same job and you come back and tell me, "This September, I'm quitting my job because I AM READY to move on and do something better." What do you think my response will be? I'll give you a clue, it won't have nothing do with "are you available?"You're missing the point! He didnt say he was now ready to fight Rigo, he has been ready for 2 years. He said he was ready to fight him in the fall which has to do with availability, not a ready to finally fight him statement. The fall is the qualifier. It is about interpreting the variables. This is the same as the famous saying that goes "Throw mama out the window" as opposed to "throw mama out the window a kiss". The word "Kiss" is the qualifier that makes the entire sentence have an entirely different meaning. "Throw mama" is the common denominator, the "Kiss" is the qualifier. End of thread.
Meanwhile... While you are here arguing with me about "qualifiers," team Lomachenko is offering a winner take all purse. Does this sound like serious negotiations to you?Last edited by HarvardBlue; 07-26-2017, 07:43 AM.Comment
Comment