Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm Ready To Fight Guillermo Rigondeaux Next!

[HarvardBlue]

Your words above are what happen when you are helpless to debate something you know you cannot debate and resort to immature panties in a bunch type comments. For the second time you missed the fact that I was talking about boxing promoter Terry Trekkas. Get a clue and dont flatter me with inside track comments because it doesnt take an expert to know the difference between negotiating on twitter and management efforts. YOU were the one who made that ****** comment that showed you didnt know there was negotiations in 2015 and tried to weasel out and change your story. Now go take some lessons from your 7 year old daughter. You sealed your ignorance with your "Rigo begging for a fight" comment.

You spent the last 2 days responding to me because of one comment I made. You changed the topic 2 or 3 times to suit your agenda. You went from context, to a 2 year old negation I could care less about, to who the responsible parties are in a negotiation. All this because I said Lomachenko (the best fighter in the game) should be ready to fight Rigondeaux or anyone at the drop of the dime. Now you're all butt hurt because I talked about your Lomachenko underwear. Remember you're the one that went low with the "peon, comment and "you're dismissed." Typical NSB poster who like to dish but can't take it when someone hits back. It's funny you refer to me as "she" when the only one with female tendencies is you. I get it you like to win an argument just like a female. So here I go; you were right and I was wrong. Now get your Lomachenko g-string out your cheeks and move on with your life you're starting to bore me.

[richardt]

You spent the last 2 days responding to me because of one comment I made. You changed the topic 2 or 3 times to suit your agenda. You went from context, to a 2 year old negation I could care less about, to who the responsible parties are in a negotiation. All this because I said Lomachenko (the best fighter in the game) should be ready to fight Rigondeaux or anyone at the drop of the dime. Now you're all butt hurt because I talked about your Lomachenko underwear. Remember you're the one that went low with the "peon, comment and "you're dismissed." Typical NSB poster who like to dish but can't take it when someone hits back. It's funny you refer to me as "she" when the only one with female tendencies is you. I get it you like to win an argument just like a female. So here I go; you were right and I was wrong. Now get your Lomachenko g-string out your cheeks and move on with your life you're starting to bore me.

Spent last two days on your comment? You poor little thing. Next time dont respond then, especially when you are wrong and someone shows you you are wrong. Your words were there and you were called out on it and showed you the fact that they were negotiating two years ago. The PEON comment was when someone like Trekkas knows the sport has to deal with fools who have no clue. Try learning something from people who know something. And I dont need to talk about your underwear obsession, child. You made a dumb comment and got called out by two people. Live with it.

[CubanGuyNYC]

If this fight somehow happens -- and I'm not convinced it will -- Rigo takes his first and possibly last "L." I can see him retiring after that. Might be forced to. No one wants to see him fight now, as a great and undefeated fighter. Once the claim of being the best in the range of his division is gone, he's probably finished.

[sterilizer]

You spent the last 2 days responding to me because of one comment I made. You changed the topic 2 or 3 times to suit your agenda. You went from context, to a 2 year old negation I could care less about, to who the responsible parties are in a negotiation. All this because I said Lomachenko (the best fighter in the game) should be ready to fight Rigondeaux or anyone at the drop of the dime. Now you're all butt hurt because I talked about your Lomachenko underwear. Remember you're the one that went low with the "peon, comment and "you're dismissed." Typical NSB poster who like to dish but can't take it when someone hits back. It's funny you refer to me as "she" when the only one with female tendencies is you. I get it you like to win an argument just like a female. So here I go; you were right and I was wrong. Now get your Lomachenko g-string out your cheeks and move on with your life you're starting to bore me.

I am female and I am offended by this ridiculous comment. This "win an argument" bull**** is ONLY YOUR BIASED INTERPRETATION of what a female frame of mind is. If you are not female, how can you even know how a woman thinks? Just ridiculous. Me and many other women don't care about "wining or losing" a bit. But if someone claims to be right at something, they'd better come up with good reasoning about why they are supposed to be right. And then, I'd admit I was wrong. And BTW I am in good shape and don't even like wearing g-strings. Another ridiculous bias from men who know nothing about women.

[Majic]

I been boxing 9 years. Newbie? Dont think so 😊

[Majic]

Lomachenko is way overrated

[Majic]

That has no bearing on anything, casual newbie.

I been boxing 9 years. Newbie?? I dont think so buddy.

[HarvardBlue]

Spent last two days on your comment? You poor little thing. Next time dont respond then, especially when you are wrong and someone shows you you are wrong. Your words were there and you were called out on it and showed you the fact that they were negotiating two years ago. The PEON comment was when someone like Trekkas knows the sport has to deal with fools who have no clue. Try learning something from people who know something. And I dont need to talk about your underwear obsession, child. You made a dumb comment and got called out by two people. Live with it.

Again, you keep arguing irrelevant points. Where did I say I didn't know about the negotiations 2 years ago? You assumed I didn't know. I also know about the first time he was supposed fight Walters but they blamed him for pricing himself out. Sounds like a trend doesn't it? Why would you assume I didn't know how negotiations work? Obviously the "hat in hands" comment was a figure of speech. I was more than willing to have polite conversation but you're the one that wanted to go the name calling route.

I responded to the article. You and the other guy decided to chime in on me. You notice I didn't respond to the other guy. And here you are still talking.

[HarvardBlue]

I am female and I am offended by this ridiculous comment. This "win an argument" bull**** is ONLY YOUR BIASED INTERPRETATION of what a female frame of mind is. If you are not female, how can you even know how a woman thinks? Just ridiculous. Me and many other women don't care about "wining or losing" a bit. But if someone claims to be right at something, they'd better come up with good reasoning about why they are supposed to be right. And then, I'd admit I was wrong. And BTW I am in good shape and don't even like wearing g-strings. Another ridiculous bias from men who know nothing about women.

Well!!! I did not see this coming. LOL.

What can I say? You got me!

[Ajvar]

I been boxing 9 years. Newbie?? I dont think so buddy.

Yeah, 9 years... exactly since your birthday. Considering what and how you post. (BS separated into 4 consequent posts in a raw). Try splitting posts by a single word next time to underline your importance.