Originally posted by Teetotaler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How come Klitschkos never fought each other but Undertake and Kane did.
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Jedi Vader View PostBecause they're pussies, pure and simple.
They both even ducked Valuev. Haye had to go in there and do their work.
But keep spinning your ******ed theory doe
Comment
-
Also how can there be so many posts without a video showing evidance why they fought?
Under taker only fought Kane after Kane burned him . The above video was the beginning of a rivalry....this directly shows Wlad would have to go to great lengths to get the fight to get his older brother in the ring. Why isnt this obvious TS?Really Wlad should have taking a page out of Kane and ttomb stoned him which would set up the battle of the Klitchkos.Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-09-2017, 11:41 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Teetotaler View PostYeah when he burned down his own home.
Talk about a ****ed up childhood. Im surprised wwe even hired them
Comment
-
Originally posted by JasonBoxing View PostBefore we go into 'wah wah wrestling is fake', the injuries a wrestler suffers during the Attitude Era was actually higher than the injuries a boxer suffered from 98-17.
So the chances of Undertaker seriously hurting his brother with a chair smash is actually HIGHER than the chances of Vitali seriously hurting Wlad with a upper cut,
Comment
Comment