How come Klitschkos never fought each other but Undertake and Kane did.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JasonBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2014
    • 1028
    • 100
    • 0
    • 22,701

    #1

    How come Klitschkos never fought each other but Undertake and Kane did.

    Before we go into 'wah wah wrestling is fake', the injuries a wrestler suffers during the Attitude Era was actually higher than the injuries a boxer suffered from 98-17.

    So the chances of Undertaker seriously hurting his brother with a chair smash is actually HIGHER than the chances of Vitali seriously hurting Wlad with a upper cut,
  • Teetotaler
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2014
    • 8434
    • 274
    • 404
    • 18,146

    #2
    Because wlad and vitali promised they mommy they wouldn't smh. Undertaker killed his parents and burned his brother kane. Idk ima just say wlad and vitali are poosies

    Comment

    • Sup
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 3463
      • 177
      • 107
      • 12,033

      #3
      Good point. Eddie Guerrero and Chavo Guerrero also fought.

      Comment

      • Deus
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2017
        • 1329
        • 56
        • 29
        • 18,075

        #4
        Originally posted by JasonBoxing
        Before we go into 'wah wah wrestling is fake', the injuries a wrestler suffers during the Attitude Era was actually higher than the injuries a boxer suffered from 98-17.

        So the chances of Undertaker seriously hurting his brother with a chair smash is actually HIGHER than the chances of Vitali seriously hurting Wlad with a upper cut,
        What the... how... why...

        Sure they suffer injuries, but their intention is NOT to hurt each other. The intention of boxing is to hurt each other... not many brothers would intentionally wish to do harm to one another so it's not remotely unreasonable that they wouldn't have fought.

        Beyond that... the Undertaker and Kane aren't related.

        Comment

        • Beercules
          Lounge POTY '17
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 65186
          • 4,940
          • 7,203
          • 950,179

          #5
          Boxing is fake.

          Comment

          • ΣNΣMY
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 1159
            • 494
            • 2,752
            • 47,548

            #6
            It's a question I ask myself everyday,bro.

            Comment

            • Szef
              Face of Boxing
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2012
              • 15016
              • 2,488
              • 1,554
              • 253,303

              #7
              Because they wanted to marinate this fight as much as possible. In fact, they're still doing it.

              They'll fight once their mom is gone and they're both in their sixties, don't worry.

              Comment

              • Teetotaler
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2014
                • 8434
                • 274
                • 404
                • 18,146

                #8
                Originally posted by Deus
                What the... how... why...

                Sure they suffer injuries, but their intention is NOT to hurt each other. The intention of boxing is to hurt each other... not many brothers would intentionally wish to do harm to one another so it's not remotely unreasonable that they wouldn't have fought.

                Beyond that... the Undertaker and Kane aren't related.
                You clearly dont know **** about wrasslin

                Originally posted by Beercules
                Boxing is fake.

                Comment

                • Butt stuff
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2014
                  • 5604
                  • 1,217
                  • 3,390
                  • 17,572

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Deus
                  What the... how... why...

                  Sure they suffer injuries, but their intention is NOT to hurt each other. The intention of boxing is to hurt each other... not many brothers would intentionally wish to do harm to one another so it's not remotely unreasonable that they wouldn't have fought.

                  Beyond that... the Undertaker and Kane aren't related.
                  1. Everyone knows the Undertaker and Kane are brothers

                  2. Wrestlers do flying kicks off turnbuckles, which is like eating 5 punches from Mike Tyson in one go- FACT.

                  Comment

                  • JasonBoxing
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2014
                    • 1028
                    • 100
                    • 0
                    • 22,701

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Deus
                    What the... how... why...

                    Sure they suffer injuries, but their intention is NOT to hurt each other. The intention of boxing is to hurt each other... not many brothers would intentionally wish to do harm to one another so it's not remotely unreasonable that they wouldn't have fought.

                    Beyond that... the Undertaker and Kane aren't related.

                    Old Kane was. The ATTITUDE Era Kane was Undertaker's brother. You are thinking of the new PG ERA Pathetic bald head PC Kane. That's another person.

                    I'm talking about the original freak Kane with the mask and the no voice/than voice box scarred Kane. That was Taker's brother and they fought each other so many times before Old Kane retired and vanished.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP