Originally posted by aboutfkntime
View Post

To answer your questions though: No I never insisted that Ward would either lose or pull out of either fight (though I believe I may have voiced that the 1st fight was unlikely to get made way back when). I favoured Kovalev in the first (and thought he narrowly deserved the nod) but maintained throughout that it was a 50 / 50 fight. I leaned towards Ward in the second by UD and suggested to those claiming it wouldn't happen that they should just be patient.
The phrase 'it makes Floyd look great'? No I don't know what you think it means. Maybe you need to enlighten me. What it sounds like is exactly what it sounded like when you had some weird Calzaghe fan claiming that all Hopkins' subsequent wins 'made Calzaghe greater'. I guess you agreed with that ****e too then didja?
I don't know why Canastota doesn't recognise fighters til some time after the dust settles but I always assumed it was because people tend to need a certain emotional distance in order to judge events in a proper historical context. The same reason why I often tell people on here (when they talk about this current fighter or that being an ATG or whatever) that they should leave that **** to the boxing historians of the future. We simply don't judge **** the same when it's recent or emotionally charged.
But I'm receptive to new ideas man. I could be wrong. Nothing is more likely. Open your mind to me. I'm sure once you get past your weird fanatical stuff you've got some interesting opinions.
Comment