Comments Thread For: Warren: Saunders Back in September, Jacobs is Highly Unlikely

[jackblack008]

Don't kid yourself. Its not a good look.

Too bad Jacobs could have had a rematch clause. Talking is easy, facing GGG is tough

[ShoulderRoll]

Of course Jacobs is highly unlikely. Saunders doesn't want to lose before he can cash out with a Canelo or Golovkin payday.

[j.razor]

Too bad Jacobs could have had a rematch clause. Talking is easy, facing GGG is tough

Speak for yourself.

[giacomino]

What Warren really meant was, "We haven't found a suitable cupcake to fight Saunders for peanuts, but we will soon." I'm sure Saunders will fight a legitimate opponent ... in 2019 or '20

[HarvardBlue]

Jacobs is unlikely because Saunders would probably get beat and they will have to pay him.

That's one of the drawbacks for losing a fight he should have won. Not only can they label you a loser and avoid you but they won't suffer any backlash for it.

[yankees7448]

You cant lie to me, I have the fight recorded. You just a sucka that believes everything your told from t.v.

No one is lying to you but your eyes fool.

[yankees7448]

That's what you say but not what's on tape.

Yes it is.

[The Akbar One]

Jacobs would stop Saunders. That is why Warren is keeping Saunders away from Jacobs. He recalls what Tete did to Paul Butler, and doesn't want to make the same mistake twice.

[j.razor]

No one is lying to you but your eyes fool.

I bet you just saw the fight once drunk, with your friends, talking through the whole fight barely even going through the rounds.

[Mr_Forte]

I bet you just saw the fight once drunk, with your friends, talking through the whole fight barely even going through the rounds.

I though Jacobs won until I rewatched it. I was drunk during the live fight and thought he edged it but on further review GGG beat him. Good fight tho I want to see it again.

Saunders vs Lemieux as co-main on Canelo-GGG. It's a mandatory and makes sense. GET IT DONE FRANK & OSCAR!!!