Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: If Pacquiao Was 100%, Mayweather Would've Lost

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    thats what happens when you fight your biggest fight, and your biggest rival, after you fought some wars, and been put to sleep....you ain't gonna be 100%....you gonna get paid though...

    at least dude was trying to press the action and put on a great performance...floyd was just in there to run, clinch, potshot, and pretty much stay away from any heated exchanges...

    Comment


    • #52
      Are people who actually think a rematch is viable brain dead?

      Why on earth would floyd fight him

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by djtmal View Post
        thats what happens when you fight your biggest fight, and your biggest rival, after you fought some wars, and been put to sleep....you ain't gonna be 100%....you gonna get paid though...

        at least dude was trying to press the action and put on a great performance...floyd was just in there to run, clinch, potshot, and pretty much stay away from any heated exchanges...
        Agree. Mayweather may have that 0 but so would many other fighters if they "fought" how he does. He kills fights. I'm not saying it's easy but that's rubbish for the sport. Pacquiao tried to put on a performance

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Kosta View Post
          Agree. Mayweather may have that 0 but so would many other fighters if they "fought" how he does. He kills fights. I'm not saying it's easy but that's rubbish for the sport. Pacquiao tried to put on a performance
          Fighting with as high a level of skill as has ever been seen in the sport is bad for the sport? Respectfully, do you feel this way about other sports or just in this instance?

          Comment


          • #55
            LMMFAO, Freddy just let it go lol!

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Kosta View Post
              Agree. Mayweather may have that 0 but so would many other fighters if they "fought" how he does. He kills fights. I'm not saying it's easy but that's rubbish for the sport. Pacquiao tried to put on a performance
              i doubt if he even threw a 3 or 4 punch combination the whole fight

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by bronx7 View Post
                mayweather probably could have beat prime manny but we deserved to see the fight the manny who beat cotto and hatton but floyd waited until manny washed up on purpose
                he should have taken those test, the same ones he took to make this fight happen in 2012.... So sad he didnt. And dont post all those damn dates n links, team pac has admitted they were the reason the first fight didnt happen.

                Comment


                • #58
                  *yawn*

                  Oh look, Pacquiao has a fight coming up that he needs to promote.

                  Time to name drop Floyd Mayweather!

                  The strategy never changes but it has become outdated and looks like a rusty antique now.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    it wasn't about no tests...thats just an excuse that the floyd boys will hang their hat on for eternity...

                    floyd and his pops was just scared in 2009 and threw in some garbage demand that they knew the little dude would walk away from...

                    pops saw how the little dude dismantled hatton, and was shook man lets face it...

                    7 years, and a ko by marquez later, floyd wanna fight...

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by bronx7 View Post
                      But no ray and Hearns fought in their primes gave fans what we paid for Floyd always about max gain lowest risk very smart but I'm
                      Not paying $99 for mcgregor ultimate con
                      Im with you regarding the McGregor farce but Im not understanding the Hearns thing. Ray only rematched him after he was stopped by Barkley and went to the edge with Kinchen. Ray also waited to fight Hagler and should have been the sacrificial lamb in 1985 as Hagler's signature moment not 1987 when he was not the same man anymore. Tommy on the other hand fought them all at their best.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP