Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua Granted IBF Exception, Must Rematch Klitschko By Dec 2

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
    Thank you for this info. But I disagree with your view on fighting Takam ; Carlos is a much easier fight and winning the IBF title would make Pulev champion which means he would be unifying : now in the scenario that you present Pulev would be coming in as a challenger so I dont see how this benefits him -- and to make matters worse you say he got no money?! WOW! how embarrassing.
    Hearn and Sauerland are on good terms. I'm sure Sauerland has a reasonable idea of what Pulev would make fighting Joshua and what he would make fighting Takam.

    There's no guarantee Pulev would beat Takam. So it would be a risk whereas even if Pulev loses to Joshua, there is a fortune to be made.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by original zero View Post
      Doesn't matter if they're willing now, the exception has been granted.

      Whereas with Fury, Duva immediately called for a purse bid because she wanted Fury to be stripped and Fury's team was too ****** to file for an exemption before Duva demanded a purse bid.
      You still defending these ****s? Have a day off son.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by denium View Post
        You still defending these ****s? Have a day off son.
        i'd ask you to take a day off from being a ****ing ****** but i realize that is out of your control.

        if people post false information, i explain why it's false and i post accurate information. about a sanctioning body, a promoter, a fighter, whatever. if i see a blatant lie posted, i'm going to set the record straight for the sake of the community.

        if people would stop posting so many lies about the IBF, there wouldn't be so much misinformation to combat.

        i'm paid to be here. why would i take a day off?

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by SkillspayBills View Post
          This shows that Hearn ****s all over Frank Warren as a promoter.
          It's true. Great work by Eddie. He gets a lot of **** but navigating this situation without getting stripped shows he knows his ****

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by original zero View Post
            Hearn and Sauerland are on good terms. I'm sure Sauerland has a reasonable idea of what Pulev would make fighting Joshua and what he would make fighting Takam.

            There's no guarantee Pulev would beat Takam. So it would be a risk whereas even if Pulev loses to Joshua, there is a fortune to be made.
            I can understand this point view - it is guaranteed BUT the opponent that he would be facing is not considering how the first fight was so competitive ; as I said in a earlier post he might be facing Klitschko ( who has already brutally knocked him out. ) -- I guess Pulev just wants the money and is not thinking about ever going down as a world champion...its also very telling that he would pass on Carlos Takam for the chance of becoming world champion and have a greater claim in a unification.

            Then you got the problem with Luis Ortiz as the WBA mandatory, possible injuries a long layoff etc...I just dont see how this is the right move.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
              Why didn't Fury get an exception?.
              Because he never applied for it first and foremost.

              Secondly because Eddie Hearn has the IBF in his pocket.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                Because he never applied for it first and foremost.

                Secondly because Eddie Hearn has the IBF in his pocket.
                that should be the end of the thread right there

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by original zero View Post
                  i'd ask you to take a day off from being a ****ing ****** but i realize that is out of your control.

                  if people post false information, i explain why it's false and i post accurate information. about a sanctioning body, a promoter, a fighter, whatever. if i see a blatant lie posted, i'm going to set the record straight for the sake of the community.

                  if people would stop posting so many lies about the IBF, there wouldn't be so much misinformation to combat.

                  i'm paid to be here. why would i take a day off?
                  It's ok son, you keep defending corrupt organisations, the rest of us will continue to laugh at you.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    IBF coming to their senses!

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Let's see if they give same to Indongo. IBF Clowns

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP