Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
Obviously, anything can happen in a Thurman/Spence fight, but if you want to say Spence has a better I.Q. than Thurman IMO you'd be all wet. Thurman is just a smarter person in general. Spence may win, but it would be equal to him fighting an uninjured Brook. IOW not an easy task for a guy who has some serious leaks in his defense. Spence talks like it would be easy work, but really he's only fooling himself. He talked like his performance was down vs Brook, but what he may never admit is... Brook made him look sub par for several rounds there. And Thurman will do the same type thing. Make no mistake, if we're talking willpower, Thurman can match or beat Spence all day. There will be some serious back and forth and other drama, no matter who wins this one. But everyone needs to at least be fair and let Thurman heal properly, and then take a tuneup fight first. Just let Spence fight some other guy(s), and cool his **** while waiting.
This in itself is an extremely ignorant comment:
"If Thurman had any confidence that he could beat Spence, that would be his next fight."
MY comments were the correct way for ANY fighter to go when there's a serious challenge like Spence knocking at the door... "But everyone needs to at least be fair and let Thurman heal properly, and then take a tuneup fight first"
And your whole explanation has way too much 'Spence fan boy' in it. I'd prefer Thurman win, but I'd accept a good win by Spence as being solid. You're all Spence, all the time. That's why your analogy is flawed. Thurman has made adjustments in his fights too. Thurman has power. Thurman is fast. Thurman pounds the body. Spence doesn't have an exclusive franchise to knowing how to fight... no matter how much you gush about his attributes being supposedly perfect. But go ahead and think it'll happen just like you say. It's you who will be disappointed, not me.
Obviously, anything can happen in a Thurman/Spence fight, but if you want to say Spence has a better I.Q. than Thurman IMO you'd be all wet. Thurman is just a smarter person in general. Spence may win, but it would be equal to him fighting an uninjured Brook. IOW not an easy task for a guy who has some serious leaks in his defense. Spence talks like it would be easy work, but really he's only fooling himself. He talked like his performance was down vs Brook, but what he may never admit is... Brook made him look sub par for several rounds there. And Thurman will do the same type thing. Make no mistake, if we're talking willpower, Thurman can match or beat Spence all day. There will be some serious back and forth and other drama, no matter who wins this one. But everyone needs to at least be fair and let Thurman heal properly, and then take a tuneup fight first. Just let Spence fight some other guy(s), and cool his **** while waiting.
This in itself is an extremely ignorant comment:
"If Thurman had any confidence that he could beat Spence, that would be his next fight."
MY comments were the correct way for ANY fighter to go when there's a serious challenge like Spence knocking at the door... "But everyone needs to at least be fair and let Thurman heal properly, and then take a tuneup fight first"
And your whole explanation has way too much 'Spence fan boy' in it. I'd prefer Thurman win, but I'd accept a good win by Spence as being solid. You're all Spence, all the time. That's why your analogy is flawed. Thurman has made adjustments in his fights too. Thurman has power. Thurman is fast. Thurman pounds the body. Spence doesn't have an exclusive franchise to knowing how to fight... no matter how much you gush about his attributes being supposedly perfect. But go ahead and think it'll happen just like you say. It's you who will be disappointed, not me.
Comment