Comments Thread For: Joshua Could Lose IBF Belt Prior To Klitschko II, Pulev Stands Firm

[aboutfkntime]

you're not making any sense. if the IBF has the worst rankings, then stop caring about their champions. nobody told you to care about their champions or their title fights.

he earned the shot because he won the eliminator fair and square. if you don't think the IBF has the best fighters, watch the leagues that have the best fighters.

we did, but then some smartass kid decided to rave about how they "deserve" their shot

[aboutfkntime]

1st wish..... Joshua dumps that shht where it belongs

2nd wish..... Pulev gets levelled, and we never hear from him again

[ShoulderRoll]

but his mandatory was shht, and Klitschko/Fury II was better

the IBF should have had more respect for Wladimir Klitschko

their ' rules doe ' system is CLEARLY inept

#secondrate

His mandatory earned his spot under the same system that got Joshua his first title shot.

Joshua followed the rules then but doesn't want to follow them now? That's why he's going to lose this title.

One thing you gotta give credit to Klitschko for is he kept the belts together for so long, he didn't make excuses and did what was required by each sanctioning body. Fulfilling all mandatories while still managing to fit in voluntary defenses of his choice along the way.

He proved it can be done and was very professional in that regard.

[original zero]

about time, who refuses to admit what his native tongue is, thinks it is a bigger insult to call something 2nd rate than to call it 3rd rate . . .

bizarre . . .

[aboutfkntime]

His mandatory earned his spot under the same system that got Joshua his first title shot.

Joshua followed the rules then but doesn't want to follow them now? That's why he's going to lose this title.

One thing you gotta give credit to Klitschko for is he kept the belts together for so long, he didn't make excuses and did what was required by each sanctioning body. Fulfilling all mandatories while still managing to fit in voluntary defenses of his choice along the way.

He proved it can be done and was very professional in that regard.

that is NOT true at all

the second-rate IBF gave Charles Martin 12 months to fight whoever he wanted

for all they knew, he would spend the next 12 months milking that rubbish by fighting tomato cans

Martin made that fight, NOT the IBF

the IBF were satisfied with Martin as their champion, despite the fact that there are PLENTY of BETTER fighters at heavyweight..... proving that they are second-rate imo

[aboutfkntime]

about time, who refuses to admit what his native tongue is, thinks it is a bigger insult to call something 2nd rate than to call it 3rd rate . . .

bizarre . . .

you're a second-rate poster, with a third-rate excuse

#secondrate
#rulesdoe
#grammar****doe

[HanzGruber]

Ibf is too strict when it comes to unifications. They would benefit from allowing the champ to unify what's the problem

[original zero]

#grammar****doe

you don't know what words mean. it's not a question of grammar. it's a question of starting idiotic arguments because you have no idea what you're talking about.

most of us here just assumed you were ******ed. which you may very well be. but clearly part of the problem is that you're embarrassed about your native tongue and don't want to admit there is a language barrier.

[original zero]

the second-rate IBF gave Charles Martin 12 months to fight whoever he wanted

because they give EVERY heavyweight champion 12 months to fight whoever they want after a mandatory fight has occurred.

the IBF were satisfied with Martin as their champion

you have no idea what they were satisfied with or what they preferred. but they can't force people to fight for them. top fighters want to be given an unfair advantage. since the IBF doesn't play favorites, top fighters don't want to fight for the IBF.

despite the fact that there are PLENTY of BETTER fighters at heavyweight.....

who didn't want to fight for them. you keep forgetting that humans are not ******.

proving that they are second-rate imo

who ever said they weren't? i personally think they are third-rate. why are you defending the IBF by saying they are second-rate? why are you supporting the IBF by saying they are second-rate?

stop being such a hypocrite. you're the biggest supporter of the IBF in this entire thread. claiming they are second-rate when clearly they are third-rate.

[original zero]

Ibf is too strict when it comes to unifications. They would benefit from allowing the champ to unify what's the problem

the IBF is the most flexible organization when it comes to unifications. the IBF is the only major org that specifically guarantees in their rules that a unification request will take priority over a mandatory.