Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Let's be honest. Floyd vs Pac was a lot closer than people made out

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by daggum View Post
    pac landed better punches. why would floyd win? round 3, 4,6-10 were all pac. only round 9 was somewhat close. even roudn 12 was close and possibly could have gone to pac. thats 7 rounds why did the judges say floyd won? that was a reputation win, definitely not on substance. keep teh fight slow paced and do very little=floyd auto wins hmmm why? they both did little but pac was better therefore he should have won but people got fooled
    Originally posted by The Akbar One View Post
    This is just another in a long line of fights covered by CompuBox, where video analysis proves CompuBox is highly fraudulent


    Yup all true.

    And best of all even with all that show stopping hugs Floyd gave that night. Pac with an injured shoulder was still able to connect more than Floyd can ever do to him. Heavier more lethal, and best of all more frequent. Even if you turn this into a olympic style scoring were hard shots are equal to pitty patter shots, PAc still comes out out landing Floyd in whichever which way.

    Easy to score who truly won this fight. Rewind clearly shows who connected more per round, and it wasn't even close. Floyd was throwing less than compubox wanted us to believe. If Floyd truly won, rewind will support it, but as we have found out. Evidence is pointing to Pac as the true winner. It wasn't even close.



    and with all the chasing Pac had to do and all the show stopping energy diffusing lame hugging Floyd had to do to stop this fight from being a fight, Pac at the end of the day did enough to outland an IV induced bigger man.

    # legendary

    A guy yells at Floyd @ 1:13 keep runnin' keep runnin' you can do it Floyd! lmao

    After getting tagged Floyd can go from one side of the fence to another in 0-60 in just 2 seconds Flat! haha!

    Run Floyd Run!




    Story of the night after the running comes the huggin'



    This is how to kill time in a super fight. Run, hug rinse repeat for 12 ***** rounds lol






    TRUTH IS OUT!

    Last edited by Spoon23; 05-30-2017, 10:01 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
      Fanboys so gullible. Throw them a bone they come and fetch.

      Such easy creatures to fool

      True. Funny thing is Floyd hired USADA, that means he was their boss. So we have the employee saying, "Hey, the boss didn't do anything wrong." WTF You gotta love it!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
        De la hoya summed up the difference between Pac fans and Floyd fans:

        "My heart says Manny, but my mind says Floyd"


        Trust your gut, smell , heart or whatever while disregarding the available facts, after all it's YOUR opinion.


        But here's the problem:

        You claimed misinformation as "a fact" when you presented your opinion.

        I don't expect you to change your opinion - just understand it's based on misinformation and I do request you to post accordingly.


        So next time say "my heart says the IV is bad, but my mind doesn't know the facts"


        Don't worry, there are plenty of pact@rds that will still find your post enlightening.
        BEFORE DAMAGE CONTROL: Bob Bennet, "Mayweather can't have it (the IV) done at his house and USADA can't authorize it."
        DAMAGE CONTROL MODE: "Mr. Mayweather did nothing wrong".LOL

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ruedboy View Post
          BEFORE DAMAGE CONTROL: Bob Bennet, "Mayweather can't have it (the IV) done at his house and USADA can't authorize it."
          DAMAGE CONTROL MODE: "Mr. Mayweather did nothing wrong".LOL

          If floyd was required to have a TUE to satisfy WADA, can Bob Bennet and the NSAC authorize it?

          We all know by now NSAC didn't require a TUE.

          SO I ASK AGAIN

          Can NSAC issue a TUE for WADA?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
            If floyd was required to have a TUE to satisfy WADA, can Bob Bennet and the NSAC authorize it?

            We all know by now NSAC didn't require a TUE.

            SO I ASK AGAIN

            Can NSAC issue a TUE for WADA?
            How do we know NSAC didn't require a TUE? On your say so? SMH
            Last edited by ruedboy; 05-30-2017, 07:47 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ruedboy View Post
              True. Funny thing is Floyd hired USADA, that means he was their boss. So we have the employee saying, "Hey, the boss didn't do anything wrong." WTF You gotta love it!
              Especially when your boss pays you 150k for a drug test that should have only cost 30k. That's a sign of a drug agency being bought right there. A dead giveaway and a no brainer that USADA would look the other way.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ruedboy View Post
                True. Funny thing is Floyd hired USADA, that means he was their boss. So we have the employee saying, "Hey, the boss didn't do anything wrong." WTF You gotta love it!
                Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                Especially when your boss pays you 150k for a drug test that should have only cost 30k. That's a sign of a drug agency being bought right there. A dead giveaway and a no brainer that USADA would look the other way.

                There is an INDEPENDENT group of doctors that make up the The****utic Use Exemptions Committee that look at the application for the TUE and make a decision based on it. There are INDEPENDENT WADA laboratories that do the testing. So you are saying the doctors on the TUEC are also all paid off, and the laboratory personnel are all paid off. Plus, let's add in the DCO.

                Bullshlt. If that many people were involved, there would be no need for a TUE at all.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  There is an INDEPENDENT group of doctors that make up the The****utic Use Exemptions Committee that look at the application for the TUE and make a decision based on it. There are INDEPENDENT WADA laboratories that do the testing. So you are saying the doctors on the TUEC are also all paid off, and the laboratory personnel are all paid off. Plus, let's add in the DCO.

                  Bullshlt. If that many people were involved, there would be no need for a TUE at all.
                  lol Have you every heard off conspired collusion and corruption in your lifetime? It's done by a group of people for money or political gain. Don't be so gullible son.

                  Anyway here, learn the truth.









                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                    lol Have you every heard off conspired collusion and corruption in your lifetime? It's done by a group of people for money or political gain.

                    Great plan. Let's involve everyone and their momma on this cheating scheme and hope no one ****. Yea, that's real smart.


                    You're an idiot.

                    Comment


                    • It was a close fight. Close to killing the sport of boxing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP