If he was overrated, why hasn't there been a single boxer who's close to 5'10 in height and close to 71 inch in reach at the very least equalled Mike Tyson's heavyweight accomplishment, if not surpassed them since Tyson came to the scene?
So no, Mike Tyson isn't 'overrated' when taking into consideration that this little midget probably shouldn't have even competed at heavyweight. The idea that because a 5'10 guy's accomplishment isn't as good as a 6'6 giant heavyweight's accomplishment makes the 5'10 boxer 'overrated' is quiet frankly, extremely absurd, bizarre and ludicrous. It's like saying a guy who weighs 150 pounds that can lift more weight than anybody his own size is overrated because he isn't able to lift more weight than someone that is 300 pounds that outweighs him by more than 100 pounds. Get the drift?
So no, Mike Tyson isn't 'overrated' when taking into consideration that this little midget probably shouldn't have even competed at heavyweight. The idea that because a 5'10 guy's accomplishment isn't as good as a 6'6 giant heavyweight's accomplishment makes the 5'10 boxer 'overrated' is quiet frankly, extremely absurd, bizarre and ludicrous. It's like saying a guy who weighs 150 pounds that can lift more weight than anybody his own size is overrated because he isn't able to lift more weight than someone that is 300 pounds that outweighs him by more than 100 pounds. Get the drift?
Comment