Originally posted by Ray*
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
American analyses Errol Spence: "You have been fooled. Kell Brook knocks him out"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostFor me those two names alone is better than Brook 4 years at 147. Brook in 13 years has Porter and thats it. His first 4 years were against boxers of no note.
Brook is the more proven fighter. Even if it's just beating 1 genuinely good fighter, it's still 1 more than Spence has as of right now.Last edited by deathofaclown; 05-24-2017, 07:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deathofaclown View PostYeah but Spence isn't fighting the Brook that's been fighting pro for 4 years. He's fighting Brook that's been a pro for over a decade and has fought and beaten better opponents than Spence has. What they did in their first 4 years is irrelevant in a head to head fight happening this weekend.
Brook is the more proven fighter. Even if it's just beating 1 genuinely good fighter, it's still 1 more than Spence has as of right now.
And the manner of the victory wasn't like it was clear cut, Spence might not have fought someone in Porter calibre but he has dealt with two different boxers, who were good enough to give Pac, Khan and Thurman a good fight.
For me Brook career is a massive disappointment, and this is coming from a boxing fan who use to back him, who use to berate Frank warren (Former promoter) for holding him back.
Comment
-
A- troll thead.
Although that guy is unintentionally hilarious. He should do a show about a reality show or something. Could go mainstream on YouTube.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostHow is Brook proven? Because he beat Porter? If he beat 3 good level fighters in 13 years then i can say he beat 3 different style, nope he beat 1 in 13 years.
And the manner of the victory wasn't like it was clear cut, Spence might not have fought someone in Porter calibre but he has dealt with two different boxers, who were good enough to give Pac, Khan and Thurman a good fight.
For me Brook career is a massive disappointment, and this is coming from a boxing fan who use to back him, who use to berate Frank warren (Former promoter) for holding him back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostGood for you for being an English boxing fan who doesn't overrated English boxers like so many of them do.In a recent boxing scene article most of the English boxing experts polled picked 3 to 1 betting favorite Davis to lose to the UK boxer. Davis slaughtered him in 3 rounds.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostHow is Brook proven? Because he beat Porter? If he beat 3 good level fighters in 13 years then i can say he beat 3 different style, nope he beat 1 in 13 years.
And the manner of the victory wasn't like it was clear cut, Spence might not have fought someone in Porter calibre but he has dealt with two different boxers, who were good enough to give Pac, Khan and Thurman a good fight.
For me Brook career is a massive disappointment, and this is coming from a boxing fan who use to back him, who use to berate Frank warren (Former promoter) for holding him back.
Algieri gave Khan a good fight because Khan is total crap. Bundu didn't land a fking glove on Thurman and Pac used Algieri as a human basket ball.
Both Algieri and Bundu gave Spence tougher fights than they gave thurman and pac, even if those fights went the distance.
Even Bundu said today that Thurman is significantly better than Spence.
Once Brook beats Spence you'll come up with a different excuse, because that's what Khan fans do.Last edited by LacedUp; 05-24-2017, 09:20 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostHow is Brook proven? Because he beat Porter? If he beat 3 good level fighters in 13 years then i can say he beat 3 different style, nope he beat 1 in 13 years.
And the manner of the victory wasn't like it was clear cut, Spence might not have fought someone in Porter calibre but he has dealt with two different boxers, who were good enough to give Pac, Khan and Thurman a good fight.
For me Brook career is a massive disappointment, and this is coming from a boxing fan who use to back him, who use to berate Frank warren (Former promoter) for holding him back.
Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying Brook as a great resume but he's still more proven than Spence because Spence isn't proven. Algieri and Bundu are not really a real test for a supposed top level fighter, Spence is. Whichever way you want to twist it, Brook is the more proven fighter in this fight. Whether he's the better fighter is another question that will be answered.
Comment
Comment