Originally posted by 1hourRun
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Why Do Boxing Robberies Continue To Happen?
Collapse
-
-
Bad judging makes my blood boil, but I look at the Murata/D'Dam fight and the judges have my sympathy.
Murata hardly threw anything for large parts of the fight. He threw 2 punches in the first round ? A jab and one at the very end ? Then N'Dam was throwing a lot, but landing almost nothing. That was a judges nightmare.
However, there were a couple of occasions where N'Dam was knocked backwards from a clean punch and would clearly have gone down but for the ropes. In my understanding these should have been called knockdowns by the ref, which would have given a couple more 10-8 rounds to Murata if called correctly (5th and 7th I think), which would mean N'Dam having to then win 8 of the other 9 rounds to get a points decision, which I doubt. If any of the judges gave N'Dam either the 5th or the 7th where he should have got a 10-8 against him, then thats where the robbery would be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postand in the meantime ndam would be landing what? nothing clean so why should murata lose? he landed the clean shots, covered up and barely got hit clean then landed some more shots. boxing? it seems like because he had so much success you expected him to have more and when he didnt you just gave it to the other guy
Comment
-
CORRECTION:
ndam-murata was NOT for the vacant middleweights strap. its not vacant. jacobs just challenged golovkin for the WBA middleweight championship, and golovkin is STILL the WBA champ.
the "regular" and "interim" and assistant and
diamond and silver and whatever are
NOT the world middleweight championship.
holding one of these belts means youvarr
DEFINITELY NOT world
champion.
aint u guys got a journalist
on staff? or an editor
or
fact
checker? somemof
the writin is good, and the volume of
content is fantastic, but christ
hire
an editor.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ceylon mooney View PostCORRECTION:
ndam-murata was NOT for the vacant middleweights strap. its not vacant. jacobs just challenged golovkin for the WBA middleweight championship, and golovkin is STILL the WBA champ.
the "regular" and "interim" and assistant and
diamond and silver and whatever are
NOT the world middleweight championship.
holding one of these belts means youvarr
DEFINITELY NOT world
champion.
aint u guys got a journalist
on staff? or an editor
or
fact
checker? somemof
the writin is good, and the volume of
content is fantastic, but christ
hire
an editor.
that is the same belt Golovkin defended 11 times in his current string of defences
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postyep, imagine Lampley and Merchant as judges
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostBy Corey Erdman - If boxing is considered to be a form of physical art, then perhaps it stands to reason that the work of its artists are all too often misinterpreted and unappreciated. On Saturday, two high level boxing matches ended in robberies-that is, that when it came time for the judges to pick a winner...
[Click Here To Read More]
... But I closely watched the Murata fight and commented here (rbr)... It was funny as ****!!! Murata kept flooring N'dam at times, but Pabon failed to notice anything!... And I even wrote here that N'dam may get a 'decision" (as long as Pabon doesn't keep track of KDs...)... and he did, ffs!!!
What a fucking shame!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by angkag View PostBad judging makes my blood boil, but I look at the Murata/D'Dam fight and the judges have my sympathy.
Murata hardly threw anything for large parts of the fight. He threw 2 punches in the first round ? A jab and one at the very end ? Then N'Dam was throwing a lot, but landing almost nothing. That was a judges nightmare.
However, there were a couple of occasions where N'Dam was knocked backwards from a clean punch and would clearly have gone down but for the ropes. In my understanding these should have been called knockdowns by the ref, which would have given a couple more 10-8 rounds to Murata if called correctly (5th and 7th I think), which would mean N'Dam having to then win 8 of the other 9 rounds to get a points decision, which I doubt. If any of the judges gave N'Dam either the 5th or the 7th where he should have got a 10-8 against him, then thats where the robbery would be.
Comment
Comment