Who cares about Judges, Fans know who win .EX Pacman vs Bradley, Garcia vs Herrera, GGG vs Jacobs. Look Kovalev and Ward are having a rematch because a lot of fans believe Kov won. Offical Judges dont matter. We are the true judges.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Immediate Rematch Clause for Canelo, But Not for Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View PostWhen GG said that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The plunger man View PostObviously with not wanting a rematch golovkin will go out and batter canelo.
whether canelo will want to have that immediate rematch remains to be seen as its not going to end well for him in september.
Canelo is hard to batter, nobody ever battered him.
Floyd just potshoted him enroute to a decision, but would not have been able to put any sort of beating on him.
Nelo is not a guy you can bully, he's built like a linebacker and can counter nicely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx23 View PostIf GGG wants to keep his 0 he can't afford a close decision. He's gotta win clear as day or get the k.o. if it's close Canelo will get the W on the cards. No way in hell they'll give it to GGG if it's close.
The key to victory for GGG is gonna be his jab and body shots mark my words
Comment
-
Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View PostKirkland, Cotto, Khan, Smith, Chavez would all lose to Brook and Jacobs.
Jacobs beats Canelo, too big, too strong.
GGG will not only have the strength and power advantage, but he'll have the height. He will have just fought a huge prime fighter in Jacobs, notba drained washed up fighter in Chavez.
If Canelo was that good, he'd of picked much better opponent than Khan, Smith, and Chavez. Unlike Golovkin, Canelo can pick anyone and doesn't have to give up an arm and leg.
Not only that, Golovkin will fight like this is the fight he's waited for. He's going to brutalize Canelo, and Canelo fans will start making excuses come June and August
U gonna put your money on GGG or do what you always do and just talk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kigali View PostI don't give a hill of beans about Cotto.
Speaking of which...
Cotto gave Floyd a better fight than Canelito.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostSince when has this not been the case,the a-side has always had this in the contract. ALWAYS
Funny how you clowns been crying that canelo wouldnt fight him or that hed want a cw knowing loeffler has said from day 1 thats never been a issue,that it's always been about$$$. Now that canelo destroyed Jr a much bigger fighter than anyone gigis ever fought,(like i said he would)& like I told your dumb****ing azz he would,hes fighting gigi in sept. Which you claimed hed wait until 2019 So how the **** does it feel to be wrong ALWAYS, your such a taint that you still continue with more skull ****ery. As soon as you gggroupies are proven wrong move onto another thing to cry & make pre-fight excuses about.You all are already making excuses already-GGGAY your saying"he aged him" wtf clowns would ***ride someone who never took a career high payday if available before he lost his prime,whos fault would that be,& how can a fight getting delayed a lil over a yr before getting signed mean he aged him. Wtf
All the gggaylords sound so re-tarded. You clowns go on every article & cry & say the same exact idiocy about anything whatsoever that u nitpik out your azzafter having been proven wrong so many times already.
You were wrong like all you gigi gi gimp unit about gigi not being responsible for the fight not happening due to rediculous demands,now dlh has confirmed gigi finally learned his place & found his pen in gez-abel sanchez' azz. He knew he might get ko'd by a bum & lose his only payday so he took the money he knew was more than hed ever get again.
STFU you biased moron. Your idol, ODLH and the ginger vagina should have fought this fight 18 months ago, at least. What they did was use politics to rob GGG of his possible glory. It's biased a ss holes like you that condone politics over the fighters actually fighting.
And just because the ginger vagina is fighting him now, that doesn't erase the complete pu ssy move of GIVING GGG his WBC belt like a beotch.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View PostKirkland, Cotto, Khan, Smith, Chavez would all lose to Brook and Jacobs.
Jacobs beats Canelo, too big, too strong.
GGG will not only have the strength and power advantage, but he'll have the height. He will have just fought a huge prime fighter in Jacobs, notba drained washed up fighter in Chavez.
If Canelo was that good, he'd of picked much better opponent than Khan, Smith, and Chavez. Unlike Golovkin, Canelo can pick anyone and doesn't have to give up an arm and leg.
Not only that, Golovkin will fight like this is the fight he's waited for. He's going to brutalize Canelo, and Canelo fans will start making excuses come June and August
Cotto has 100x better resume then Brook does. AND actually Beaten HOFamers and MW's.
The BEST and ONLY win you can count for Brook is Porter by MD.
Cotto beat a PRIME Mosley.
Mosley WAY better than Porter. Sure Cotto lost to a roided, CW Pac and A POS who loaded his gloves to win. He beat Daniel Geale who is like a top 5 fight for GGG lol..
Comment
Comment