Comments Thread For: Immediate Rematch Clause for Canelo, But Not for Golovkin

[Joe Beamish]

Jacobs won't fight GGG again anyway unless he can jave his own special weigh-in rules

[bigjer88]

Damn GGG a hoe in the negotiations table

Everybody knows that's the only way this fight could be made.

[kushking]

GOLDEN GIRL ****TIONS AND OSCARINA DE LA **** PLAYING CROOKED GAMES AS ALWAYS.... CROOKED JUDGES WILL BE SCORING THE FIGHT ALSO.... IF GGG LOSES OR GETS ROBBED BY THE CROOKED GOLDEN GIRL JUSGES LIKE LARA DID THERE WILL BE NO REMATCH..... THESE CROOKED MEXICAN ******** HAVE NO SHAME..... RIP GOLDEN GIRL ****TIONS....

Since when has this not been the case,the a-side has always had this in the contract. ALWAYS
Funny how you clowns been crying that canelo wouldnt fight him or that hed want a cw knowing loeffler has said from day 1 thats never been a issue,that it's always been about$$$. Now that canelo destroyed Jr a much bigger fighter than anyone gigis ever fought,(like i said he would)& like I told your dumb****ing azz he would,hes fighting gigi in sept. Which you claimed hed wait until 2019 So how the **** does it feel to be wrong ALWAYS, your such a taint that you still continue with more skull ****ery. As soon as you gggroupies are proven wrong move onto another thing to cry & make pre-fight excuses about.You all are already making excuses already-GGGAY your saying"he aged him" wtf clowns would ***ride someone who never took a career high payday if available before he lost his prime,whos fault would that be,& how can a fight getting delayed a lil over a yr before getting signed mean he aged him. Wtf
All the gggaylords sound so re-tarded. You clowns go on every article & cry & say the same exact idiocy about anything whatsoever that u nitpik out your azzafter having been proven wrong so many times already.

You were wrong like all you gigi gi gimp unit about gigi not being responsible for the fight not happening due to rediculous demands,now dlh has confirmed gigi finally learned his place & found his pen in gez-abel sanchez' azz. He knew he might get ko'd by a bum & lose his only payday so he took the money he knew was more than hed ever get again.

[sterilizer]

Unless GGG KO's Canelo, then he does not have a snowball chance in hell. All this rematch clause does is tell me to expect some cards like the one favoring Canelo in the Mayweather bout.

They are looking to rob GGG (if he does win) and not allow him to exercise a rematch clause.

There was no card FAVORING Canelo, there was a ridiculous card with a draw (114-114 or 6-6 in rounds), and there was also another somewhat ridiculous card with 116-112 (8-4 in rounds), when clearly, the fight was 10-2 for most people, or 118-110. In favor of Floyd of course.

I think GGG should jab Canelo away, and then when Canelo gases out like he always does past the middle of every fight, send him to a corner and pound his body and head away until the referee stops it or Canelo takes a knee and maybe quits the next round.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

There was no card FAVORING Canelo, there was a ridiculous card with a draw (114-114 or 6-6 in rounds), and there was also another somewhat ridiculous card with 116-112 (8-4 in rounds), when clearly, the fight was 10-2 for most people, or 118-110. In favor of Floyd of course.

I think GGG should jab Canelo away, and then when Canelo gases out like he always does past the middle of every fight, send him to a corner and pound his body and head away until the referee stops it or Canelo takes a knee and maybe quits the next round.

You dont think the draw card was favoring Canelo? I call that a favor. What do you call it?

[ShoulderRoll]

That's A-side leverage, baby.

[Robi13]

Just in case Canelo gets robbed! No need for rematch clause, decisive win for Canelo! I'm making money on this fight, bet now because closer it is to fight night, odds will close and Canelo may be favorite by time bell rings

[elcashanilla]

thats what happens when you are the A side you have options

[sterilizer]

You dont think the draw card was favoring Canelo? I call that a favor. What do you call it?

IDK, favoring sounds to me like "leaning towards" or "preferring" which would mean giving Canelo the advantage, not a tie (the draw).

I would call it "a card extremely biased in favor of Canelo," the draw one, and "a card slightly biased in favor of Canelo," as in the 8-4 card.

This is semantics. Yes there's an interpretation that would mean giving him a favor, but AFAIK favoring mostly implies giving the nod to someone, giving them the win, not just "a favor" in which case, according to your own interpretation, ALL THREE CARDS were "favoring" Canelo vs. Floyd, because none of them was 118-110 or even 119-109, which would have been a fair ruling.

[Hatesrats]

GEE: "Good luck in September,"

Alvarez: "Luck is for mediocre people."