Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: HBO's Replay of Joshua-Klitschko Peaked at 890K Viewers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: HBO's Replay of Joshua-Klitschko Peaked at 890K Viewers

    How good was the Anthony Joshua-Wladimir Klitschko heavyweight title fight? So good that, according to Nielsen Media Research ratings released Tuesday, an average of 738,000 viewers watched HBO's same-day replay of Joshua-Klitschko. HBO's delayed telecast started at 11 p.m. ET on Saturday, five full hours after it ended with Joshua winning by 11th-round technical knockout in London.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    GAYSON SHAW here it is. What u ask for.

    Comment


    • #3
      HBOLD IS AVAILABLE IN 27% MORE HOMES! THEY SHOULD BEAT SHOWTIME BY MORE THAN THIS..... GOOD FOR JOSHUA TO GET GOOD RATINGS ON BOTH CHANNELS..... PLUS 1.5 MILLION PPV'S IN LONDON.....

      HBO = 30 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS!
      SHOWTIME = 22 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS!

      FACTS MATTER
      Last edited by JASON SHAW; 05-02-2017, 12:22 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Proof that despite delayed broadcasting, HBO still has a greater core audience than Showtime. Some of these guys weren't expecting to see these numbers come out!
        Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
        GAYSON SHAW here it is. What u ask for.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
          GAYSON SHAW here it is. What u ask for.
          ****ITIS HBOLD IS IN 27% MORE HOMES THAN SHOWTIME!!! SO WHICH ****** SAID SHOWTIME WOULD BEAT THEM???? ONLY ******S LIKE YOU WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH HAYMON LMFAO..... HBO IS SUPPOSED TO DOMINATE SHOWTIME... IF SHOWTIME WAS IN MILLIONS OF MORE HOMES THAN HBO WE WOULD EXPECT SHOWTIME TO WIN EVERYTIME ALSO...... ONE AGAIN FACTS MATTER ****ITIS..... SHOWTIME IS IN 22 MILLION HOMES AND HBO IS IN 30 MILLION HOMES.... LEARN MATH
          Last edited by JASON SHAW; 05-02-2017, 12:21 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Not being able to advertise in advance seems to have undercut the numbers for both shows.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by latinlingo View Post
              proof that despite delayed broadcasting, hbo still has a greater core audience than showtime. Some of these guys weren't expecting to see these numbers come out!
              are ggg fans ******ed or cant read english???the article says hbo is in 8 million more homes than showtime you dumbass.... They only beat showtime by like 2 houndred thousand idiot...... You glo****s are even more ******ed than pac"turds"... Hbo subscribers = 30 million
              showtime subscribers = 22 million

              do the math ******!!! Its not that hard

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                Not being able to advertise in advance seems to have undercut the numbers for both shows.
                THIS FIGHT DID BETTER THAN ALLL THE HBO SHOWS THIS YEAR WHICH WERE PROMOTED HEAVILY.... SO NO!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
                  THIS FIGHT DID BETTER THAN ALLL THE HBO SHOWS THIS YEAR WHICH WERE PROMOTED HEAVILY.... SO NO!
                  IMO had SHO and HBO been able to advertise in advance then the numbers would've been better. If we disgree that is ok.

                  Good news is abouy 1.5 mil watched the fight in the US. I'll take that as a positive.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    Not being able to advertise in advance seems to have undercut the numbers for both shows.
                    Or Fury v. Klitschko turned a lot of people off to heavyweight boxing. That was a horrible fight. Worse than May-Pac. But May-Pac gets blamed whenever PPV numbers are low. So why not blame Fury-Klitschko for these numbers?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP