Originally posted by therealpugilist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG has 1 competitive fight now he is "slipping" yea right more like media overhyping
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by considerthis View PostHe's been slipping for a while now...I know it doesn't fit with your narrative tho. Name some other fighters who are at their peak at 35 yrs old. When he finally loses, you'll be saying he was in his prime even if he's 40.
Golovkin aint slipping, he been exposed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sledgeweather17 View PostThose other fighters fought quality opposition for many years prior to reaching that age and turned pro much earlier. It's not a valid comparison and you know it.
Golovkin aint slipping, he been exposed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View PostBrook is much bigger than the division he normally fights in, and that was highly publicized. Didn't he actually outweigh GGG on fight night? If you have touted his talent, I haven't seen much of it as I've seen the ragging on him. Like I said, since Golovkin's been "exposed" we should see challengers coming out of the woodwork, right? Right??
Struggling to make weight doesn't mean he's massive in the ring on fight night. Some people can't dehydrate as much as others.
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View PostGGG just isnt the fighter the media and his die hards made him out to be
he is a very good fighter, could be great if he actually takes risks
jacobs deserves a rematch and you same whining crybabies who whined about ward and kov should be upset your hero will swerve his onlu competitive oppponent
come on man....he aint slipping, he was just slightly overrated by some, and crazy overrated by hbo n casuals
Comment
-
Jacobs got outboxed 8-4 type of win, that's being generous to Jacobs.
No rematch is needed, the unified champion took this guy to boxing school and Jacobs didn't even have the sporting integrity to take part for the IBF weigh in, what kind of guy does that?
The GGG haters are actually beyond pathetic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostComparing Golovkin-Jacobs to Ward-Kovalev is dumb. One had a rematch clause, the other did not. One has a much better option as the next fight, the other did not. One talked about retiring, the other did not. You can say that Jacobs deserves a rematch (he does), but to say both situations are the same makes you an idiotic fanboy.
Pretty much only decent thing in this thread.
Basically Sanchez planned for Danny to start swinging wildly and expose himself (and get KTFO in the process), which never happened. The only good about Sanchez' plan was the jab. I wouldn't have thought of trying to outjab a bigger, stronger opponent, but it happened. Golovkin was not well coached in that fight, however he still outjabbed his bigger and stronger foe and was the aggressor and ring general for most of the fight.
Let's not try to distort facts here though. The dude IS 35. He is getting old, and he will lose eventually.
Sure he might lose, but we don't definitely know If he will and who will hand him that loss because right now at 160 to 168 there isn't any clear cut guy who will do it, he already outboxed the guy who was the number 2 of the 160 division.
Comment
-
Comment