Comments Thread For: Is Lomachenko The Best Pound-for-Pound Fighter in Boxing?

[JASON SHAW]

Back to back? Funny how you exclude the Walters fight which happened between those two you named

Probably because Garcia looked like crap against Peterson and should have lost to Herrera. Porter also has no big wins himself. Both are good wins, and I think Thurman deserves credit but no way in hell is he in the top 5, or even 8 IMO.

UM WALTERS WAS COMING OFF AN ALMOST 400 DAY LAYOFF YOU CASUAL BUM

[JASON SHAW]

punk i gotta agree with you on this.
How the **** they make loma pound for pound the best in boxing after only 9 fights and none of them a future hall of famer? **** off with that ****! I got andre ward and terrence crawford and keith thurman 1-2-3. I got canelo and bradley rounding up the top 5.

punk i got canelo, thurman, crawford, ggg, ward,mikey, manny all above loma for sure ....

[JASON SHAW]

u mean beating nicholas walters and sosa back to back. Remember rocky was before that.

Also remember that some people think porter beat thurman

i forgot the walters fight because he was coming off an almost 400 day layoff..... I have yet to meet any expert who thinks porter won..... I got canelo, crawford, ggg, thurman, ward, mikey all above loma...

[JASON SHAW]

only thing is, the later got close decisions on both, not a total domination...and why did you leave walters and russell out? Both were schooled, one quit. The kind may not be #1, but he's got the skills imo.

i personally thought thurman beat porter and danny clearly... They also happen to be way better fighters than roman and sosa.... I forgot the walters fight because he was coming off a 400 day layoff.... I got canelo, ward, thurman, ggg, crawford, mikey all above loma on the p4p list

[JASON SHAW]

he decimated gr jr and walters as well. Stings a bit, i know but it's only until you accept the fact that lomachenko = number 1.

walters was coming off a 400 day layoff so i dont put much stock in that one... Gary russell was a great performance by loma for sure.... But beating sosa and roman does not make you p4p king... I have canelo, ward, thurman, mikey, crawford all over loma on the list...

[UNBIASED BOXING]

walters was coming off a 400 day layoff so i dont put much stock in that one... Gary russell was a great performance by loma for sure.... But beating sosa and roman does not make you p4p king... I have canelo, ward, thurman, mikey, crawford all over loma on the list...

LMAO, you are such a ****ing hypocrite. Walters was rated higher than Gamboa and you have Crawford higher then Lomachenko? Then you make this BS "400 days" claim.

1st off, it was approximately 11 months. That's nowhere near 400 days you ******.

2nd off, not only did Gamboa come in the smaller man against Crawford, but HE DIDN'T FIGHT FOR OVER A YEAR (longer than Walter's layoff) when he finally fought Crawford. You goddamn hypocrite.

**** outta here. Thanks for proving the point that most of the Loma haters are irrational and biased against him for some reason outside of boxing reasons.

[Shadoww702]

LMAO, you are such a ****ing hypocrite. Walters was rated higher than Gamboa and you have Crawford higher then Lomachenko? Then you make this BS "400 days" claim.

1st off, it was approximately 11 months. That's nowhere near 400 days you ******.

2nd off, not only did Gamboa come in the smaller man against Crawford, but HE DIDN'T FIGHT FOR OVER A YEAR (longer than Walter's layoff) when he finally fought Crawford. You goddamn hypocrite.

**** outta here. Thanks for proving the point that most of the Loma haters are irrational and biased against him for some reason outside of boxing reasons.

Boxing odds: Lomachenko heavy favorite over Walters
Vasyl Lomachenko as the (-900) favorite
Nicholas Walters is the (+550) underdog.

Boxing odds: Crawfor is the slight favorite over Gamboa
Terence Crawford is the (-210) favorite
Gamboa who is (+175) underdog.


This IDIOT went FULL RTARD saying Walters is better than Gamboa. That right there tells me he doesn't know SHT about boxing.

[Shadoww702]

LMAO, you are such a ****ing hypocrite. Walters was rated higher than Gamboa and you have Crawford higher then Lomachenko? Then you make this BS "400 days" claim.

1st off, it was approximately 11 months. That's nowhere near 400 days you ******.

2nd off, not only did Gamboa come in the smaller man against Crawford, but HE DIDN'T FIGHT FOR OVER A YEAR (longer than Walter's layoff) when he finally fought Crawford. You goddamn hypocrite.

**** outta here. Thanks for proving the point that most of the Loma haters are irrational and biased against him for some reason outside of boxing reasons.

I like seeing grown men cry and make up excuses.

Tell me again how Lomachenko doesn't/shouldn't have a loss to Salido???

Loma fans sure do CRY a lot...



Was this you after Salido beat Lomachenko??? And now because REAL boxing fans won't put him P4P #1 yet???

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Boxing odds: Lomachenko heavy favorite over Walters
Vasyl Lomachenko as the (-900) favorite
Nicholas Walters is the (+550) underdog.

Boxing odds: Crawfor is the slight favorite over Gamboa
Terence Crawford is the (-210) favorite
Gamboa who is (+175) underdog.


This IDIOT went FULL RTARD saying Walters is better than Gamboa. That right there tells me he doesn't know SHT about boxing.

Here we go ahead, Shadoww with the ******ed posts. You actually, like seriously, posted odds as a way of comparing fighters

Is this for real?

I like seeing grown men cry and make up excuses.

Tell me again how Lomachenko doesn't/shouldn't have a loss to Salido???

Loma fans sure do CRY a lot...



Was this you after Salido beat Lomachenko??? And now because REAL boxing fans won't put him P4P #1 yet???

I don't even have Lomachenko #1 P4P. He's in my top 5, and just about everyone else.

You must be on /suicide mode the more Lomachenko keeps winning

[JASON SHAW]

lmao, you are such a ****ing hypocrite. Walters was rated higher than gamboa and you have crawford higher then lomachenko? Then you make this bs "400 days" claim.

1st off, it was approximately 11 months. That's nowhere near 400 days you ******.

2nd off, not only did gamboa come in the smaller man against crawford, but he didn't fight for over a year (longer than walter's layoff) when he finally fought crawford. You goddamn hypocrite.

**** outta here. Thanks for proving the point that most of the loma haters are irrational and biased against him for some reason outside of boxing reasons.

so you just ignore the postol dominatin you bum? Hahahaha.... Lets not forget lomachenko lost to that old ass uber driver salido also... Mikey dominated that bum in his prime just like he did with roman and juan ma.... I dont give a damn about gamboa but he is better than anyone lomachenko has beaten and you and your bum ass knows that....