Comments Thread For: Andre Ward: There Was No Robbery; It Was A Close Fight That I Won!
Collapse
-
Ok so you say Kovalev won first half and Ward the second half. Then the scorecards according to your logic means Kovalev should have indeed won based soley on the lone knockdown scorecards would be 115-113 cuz of the 10-8 round. So I guess you should rethink that post.
Then NUMBER them 1-12 down the columns. And put a K or A on the rows (For Kov and Andre).
We ALL know Ward went down. So put a 10 in the K box and a 8 in the W box.
Then add ANOTHER (6) 10 scores below in the K boxes. Then (5) 9 score. NOW put (6) 9 scores in the W boxes. And (5) 10 scores... Whats that add???Comment
-
[QUOTE=mathed;17589813]
I don't understand??? Holy SHT??? Those BELTS look a SHT ton like these??? Is that what you are trying to say???
No WONDER why your soo F'n SALTY!!!! LOL Ward put them on the opposite arms...Last edited by Shadoww702; 04-13-2017, 08:42 PM.Comment
-
I saw the same expression of surprise on Shane Mosely's face immediately after the verdict was announced in the 2nd DLH fight.
Ward-Kovalev was close so calling it a robbery is misguided. But no doubt it was an unpopular decision because a greater number of observers felt Kovalev edged it or at least earned a draw.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Your eloquence, if there is any, will not erase the fact that ward lose the fight. Close fight or not. He simply lost. No ifs, no buts.Comment
-
I am a Kovalev admirer, but can still distinguish when one punches the air or the arms instead of hitting the target, which is what Krusher did for a lot of the second half of the fight. I had Ward winning by three points at the end.Comment
-
Yeah right, close fight my ass. Kovalev dominated and was jobbed thanks to those dirty judges and corrupt Vegas.Comment
Comment