Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Stewart Wrong For Saying Juarez hits harder than Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Asian Sensation
    LOL, so am I still a poser?
    see new thread in dome

    Comment


    • #72
      Pacman straight left > Rocky left hook
      KnockedDown Barrera > Staggered old Barrera
      Staggered Morales > Nobody staggers Morales except Pac and Raheem

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by $Manny_P$
        I think I'd rather take Juarez's left hook on the chin than Pac's straight punch.
        lol i won't take any of those guys shots ....

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Chups
          Pacman straight left > Rocky left hook
          KnockedDown Barrera > Staggered old Barrera
          Staggered Morales > Nobody staggers Morales except Pac and Raheem
          i would love to see PAC-Rocky fight to get this power thing answered ...

          chups your equation seems accurate ...

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by $Manny_P$
            yea, but Stewart said, you can see Pac's punches coming all the time. That's why I keep saying Stweart is wrong for this one.
            rocky's punches are shorter and therefore more compact and harder to see coming

            Comment


            • #76
              This thread stinks of Pacman nuttsack riders

              If Pacman is this monster puncher, then why does he need to land like a hundred flush powershots on Morales or Barreras face to stop them?
              He is an accomulative puncher, his strenght is his speed and workrate. not a crushing puncher at all, hits hard, but not huge.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by mauricio604
                This thread stinks of Pacman nuttsack riders

                If Pacman is this monster puncher, then why does he need to land like a hundred flush powershots on Morales or Barreras face to stop them?
                He is an accomulative puncher, his strenght is his speed and workrate. not a crushing puncher at all, hits hard, but not huge.
                Exactly, because Barrera and Morales are easy to KO
                [IMG]http://i46.***********.com/albums/f121/asian_sensation201/leavetheinternet.jpg[/IMG]

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by mauricio604
                  This thread stinks of Pacman nuttsack riders

                  If Pacman is this monster puncher, then why does he need to land like a hundred flush powershots on Morales or Barreras face to stop them?
                  He is an accomulative puncher, his strenght is his speed and workrate. not a crushing puncher at all, hits hard, but not huge.
                  HOW A ABOUT THE ONE PUCH KNOCK-DOWN BY PACMAN TO MARQUEZ AND LUCERO?WHAT CAN YOU SAY ABOUT THAT?

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by mauricio604
                    This thread stinks of Pacman nuttsack riders

                    If Pacman is this monster puncher, then why does he need to land like a hundred flush powershots on Morales or Barreras face to stop them?
                    He is an accomulative puncher, his strenght is his speed and workrate. not a crushing puncher at all, hits hard, but not huge.
                    is that Morales in your avatar? Don't be mad Pac avenged his loss and turned the table in the 2nd fight by KOing Terible.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      manny steward is wrong cause manny pacman would knock juarez out if they went at it blow for blow

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP