Comments Thread For: Flanagan Wants Lomachenko or Linares, Says Frank Warren
Collapse
-
I don't know if I should praise Flanagan or express disapproval for his illustrious ambition, leaning towards approval because I cant blame him for wanting a long sought after payday and the big stage that comes with it ( yes that's what it is to me ) instead of risking defeat fighting prospects why not lose to a respectable opponent ? because hes delusional if he thinks hes beating the men mentioned! when you arguably lost to Petrov and couldn't finish that 42 year old African! -- oh wait I'm back to hating him!!!Comment
-
Comment
-
It all comes down to money at this point, and on that, Frank Warren seems to have made near no effort.
Anthony Crolla versus Jorge Linares, both times, seemed to sellout/near sellout Manchester Arena; no time stamp for the photo circling the web, but Flanagan-Petrov seemed to have done nowhere near that.
I have no idea what the actual gate off of either Crolla-Linares fight was, but Eddie Hearn is apparently offering Frank Warren a chance to sellout Manchester Arena, with his Manchester fighter.
With no quibbling over the TV (Flanagan-Crolla isn't a Sky Box Office fight, so the BT Sport/BoxNation package isn't all that much a fallback from Sky), you have the parameters for a sizable event.
If the asking price, for Frank Warren to control an event that should sellout Manchester Arena, is a million dollars (805k British pounds), I'm not all that sure that that's much of a pricing out.
Anthony Joshua vs Eric Molina apparently did 3 million British pounds at Manchester Arena; Frank Warren's got a Man City fighter (Flanagan) vs Man U fighter (Crolla), fighting in Manchester for a world title and he can't find a way to half of that?
And that's before even getting into any of the TV revenues.
Crolla gets 805k, Flanagan gets 805k, Frank Warren gets his share, and then Warren and Flanagan split any other upside the way they'd split it.Comment
-
The Linares/Garcia fight is a nearly done deal. So why isn't Warren & Flanagan talking Robert Easter Jnr!Comment
-
Comment
-
The asking price was 1 million British pounds from Hearn. Given the fact it's no longer a unification I thought that was a bit steepIt all comes down to money at this point, and on that, Frank Warren seems to have made near no effort.
Anthony Crolla versus Jorge Linares, both times, seemed to sellout/near sellout Manchester Arena; no time stamp for the photo circling the web, but Flanagan-Petrov seemed to have done nowhere near that.
I have no idea what the actual gate off of either Crolla-Linares fight was, but Eddie Hearn is apparently offering Frank Warren a chance to sellout Manchester Arena, with his Manchester fighter.
With no quibbling over the TV (Flanagan-Crolla isn't a Sky Box Office fight, so the BT Sport/BoxNation package isn't all that much a fallback from Sky), you have the parameters for a sizable event.
If the asking price, for Frank Warren to control an event that should sellout Manchester Arena, is a million dollars (805k British pounds), I'm not all that sure that that's much of a pricing out.
Anthony Joshua vs Eric Molina apparently did 3 million British pounds at Manchester Arena; Frank Warren's got a Man City fighter (Flanagan) vs Man U fighter (Crolla), fighting in Manchester for a world title and he can't find a way to half of that?
And that's before even getting into any of the TV revenues.
Crolla gets 805k, Flanagan gets 805k, Frank Warren gets his share, and then Warren and Flanagan split any other upside the way they'd split it.
I also know warren was open to letting matchroom promote the fight if that was what it take to get the fight done but matchroom went in a different directionComment
-
Compare the MEN for Crolla vs Linares II against how it was for Flanagan vs Petrov. If they faced each other it would be Crolla who packed out the arena, not Flanagan, so he needs to be paid the lion's shareComment
Comment