Titos power overrated at middle?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jabsRstiff
    ! ! ! !
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2004
    • 8964
    • 498
    • 136
    • 16,167

    #31
    Originally posted by SturmRules
    if i was euro why would i be denying it? hey other guys on the board should i be arguing with htis guy or is he the most ******ed dude on the forum cause i dont wanna waste my time

    I hope to God you're not being taught how to write in an American school.
    You are butchering the hell out of the English language.

    Quit while you're ahead & admit you are not an American.

    Comment

    • PRboxingfan
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2004
      • 2670
      • 107
      • 59
      • 8,939

      #32
      Originally posted by SturmRules
      well cheriffi just had 3 super middle weight fights then fought a guy named paul sextius who is a light middle and tito just got KO'd at middle by B-hop so i have doubts it was a middle weight fight and tito KO cheriffi almsot 2 years ago before sturm KO'd him in 3
      Tito got KO'd by Hopkins but has won his other 3 middleweight fights by KO/TKO (Mayorga, Cherifi, and Joppy). His KO percentage is 75% and his win-KO percentage is 100% at middleweight. Can anyone else say that?


      Originally posted by SturmRules
      well lets see hmm tito KO joppy in round 5 i think and joppy is a true middle weight. yet it took 8 rounds for tito to KO mayorga who was in his first middle weight fight and is just a blown up welter. so my point is tito's power to me will not be effective agaisnt bigger guys liek hopkins/taylor/and sturm who r reall middle weights.

      btw sturm beat oscar something tito couldnt do and he KO cheriffi 1 round earlier

      btw overrated and not having any are 2 diff things.. yes tito has amazing power even though he has moved up in weight, but is it really that good to KO the true middleweight guys? i say no
      Mayorga had NEVER been dropped in his carrer, no, his life. Tito was the first to do it and to do it in an impressive manner. If you look at what counts, Tito beat Oscar and Oscar beat Sturm, period.

      Comment

      • AintGottaClue
        What for that be
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 6204
        • 221
        • 92
        • 12,939

        #33
        lolololol tito beat oscar and oscar beat sturm lolololololol i think even jabs would agree with me that u r wrong

        Comment

        • jabsRstiff
          ! ! ! !
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 8964
          • 498
          • 136
          • 16,167

          #34
          I had Trinidad-DeLaHoya 6rds to 6.

          Sturm beat Oscar 8-4, IMO.

          Comment

          • AintGottaClue
            What for that be
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 6204
            • 221
            • 92
            • 12,939

            #35
            see PRbox dont interupt two guys arguing with **** liek that know where were we

            Comment

            • PRboxingfan
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2004
              • 2670
              • 107
              • 59
              • 8,939

              #36
              Originally posted by SturmRules
              see PRbox dont interupt two guys arguing with **** liek that know where were we
              What? Jabs had the DLH-Tito fight even, as did I. As for the Sturm fight, I had it 7-5 in favor of Sturm. But, if you look at what matters, the W column, Oscar lost the first and won the second.

              Now, what where you saying?

              BTW, I believe that Tito would KO Sturm and would win a UD against Taylor, but that's just my opinion. Tito is the second best Middleweight and the hardest-hitting fighter south of 168. Look for Tito to KO Winky in 9. I hope the Hopkins fight gets signed after that because I've seen Hopkins deteriorate as of late and he is finally prime for the pickings. I wouldn't be surprised if Eastman took a page out of Johnson's book and does to Bernard what he (Johnson) did to RJJ.

              Comment

              • AintGottaClue
                What for that be
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2004
                • 6204
                • 221
                • 92
                • 12,939

                #37
                hopkins will fight the winner of winky/tito i just think titos power is overrated at middle thats all

                and u just said oscar beat sturm period? wtf

                yes oscar does have the W in the colum he also has the 2004 robbery of the year to go with it also what u say about that?

                Comment

                • oldgringo
                  Ellis
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 12747
                  • 968
                  • 453
                  • 30,064

                  #38
                  Tito's power is not overrated. There is no evidence to suggest this whatsoever...

                  Comment

                  • jack_the_rippuh
                    I to your mom..
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2004
                    • 31699
                    • 1,148
                    • 627
                    • 65,521

                    #39
                    Originally posted by PRboxingfan
                    What? Jabs had the DLH-Tito fight even, as did I. As for the Sturm fight, I had it 7-5 in favor of Sturm. But, if you look at what matters, the W column, Oscar lost the first and won the second.

                    Now, what where you saying?

                    BTW, I believe that Tito would KO Sturm and would win a UD against Taylor, but that's just my opinion. Tito is the second best Middleweight and the hardest-hitting fighter south of 168. Look for Tito to KO Winky in 9. I hope the Hopkins fight gets signed after that because I've seen Hopkins deteriorate as of late and he is finally prime for the pickings. I wouldn't be surprised if Eastman took a page out of Johnson's book and does to Bernard what he (Johnson) did to RJJ.
                    You lost your prediction credibility after you said Bruseles would beat Mayweather...

                    Comment

                    • PRboxingfan
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 2670
                      • 107
                      • 59
                      • 8,939

                      #40
                      Originally posted by SturmRules
                      hopkins will fight the winner of winky/tito i just think titos power is overrated at middle thats all

                      and u just said oscar beat sturm period? wtf

                      yes oscar does have the W in the colum he also has the 2004 robbery of the year to go with it also what u say about that?
                      No, I didn't say period, look at my post. You know what I got to say about that? Look at Hagler-Leonard. That was highway robbery if I ever saw it. Look at Burton-Augustus, another paradigm case. So many fights are "stolen" each year that I wouldn't have the time nor energy to list them for you. I think the Leonart-Hagler fight is a great example because while History remembers Sugar Ray as winning the fight, those who saw the fight know that Hagler really won (I've seen it many, many times and I still have Hagler winning at least 8 rounds).


                      Originally posted by jack_the_rippuh
                      You lost your prediction credibility after you said Bruseles would beat Mayweather...
                      Haha, you'se a funny dude. I never said he would beat him, merely that it wouldn't be as lopsided as everyone thought it would. I was wrong. Does that mean I can't have prediction credibility in your eyes? So be it. I'm sure you've always been right on the money with your predictions.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP